Notice To Third Party - Judgment Search Results

A.K. Kochumoideen and ors. Vs. the Kerala Financial Corporation and an ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1987Ker197

application properly. I see no merit in the Civil Revision Petition and it is accordingly dismissed. Commercial - notice to third party - Sections 31 and 32 of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - proceedings under Act was in progress

Vysyaraju Sanyasi Raju (Died) by Lrs. and Others Vs. Potnuru Venkata R ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2001(1)ALD58; 2000(6)ALT405

the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Srikakulam under which the application filed on behalf of the defendants for issuing notice to third parties under Order 8-A of CPC has been allowed. Whereas CRP No.215 of 1999 has been filed against … the insurer as the appellant and not otherwise. In the instant case, the insurer has not withdrawn from party array but has remained prosecuting the appeal with the insured on the grounds which are available only to

S. Maruthai and Another Vs. Gokuldoss Dharam Doss and Four Others

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 1999(3)CTC724

an advocate at Chingleput addressed to the plaintiff as well as the second defendant In that notice a third party claimed title to 53 cents of land in the suit property as his property. Therefore the plaintiff caused

Dahiben Umedbhai Patel and Others Vs. Norman James Hamilton and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1983)85BOMLR275; [1985]57CompCas700(Bom)

no existing liability of the company but that, after the purchase of the shares, the defendants had received notices from third parties as well as from the sales tax and income-tax authorities making large claims against the … cumulative preference shares belonged to one Mrs. Khambatta, who was a non-resident. It was, therefore, agreed between the parties that if there was any difficulty in the sale of the shares belonging to Mrs. Khambatta, defendants Nos.

Victory Laminations Vs. Plastolite Industries and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1982Mad243; (1982)1MLJ105

Civil Procedure Code, a defendant in the suit can get the leave of the court to issue a notice to third parties. The order reads:-"8-A (1). Where a defendant claims to be entitled to contribution from or indemnify against … to contribution from or indemnify against any person not already a party to the suit (hereinafter called a third party) he may, by leave of the court, issue a notice (hereinafter called a third party notice) to that

Celir Llp versus Mr. Sumati Prasad Bafna & Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2024]12S.C.R.1618

Court Reports in pursuance of the Bank’s application for obtaining physical possession of the Secured Asset issued a notice to the Subsequent Transferee, the Borrower filed an application for seeking a stay of the same. (vii) That the … the petitioner-auction purchaser; Respondent no.4 ‘Greenscape IT Park LLP’ and its director, i.e., respondent no.2 were the subsequent transferee/third party purchaser and respondent no.3, ‘Union Bank of India’ was the secured creditor/ bank. Accordingly, the following questions arose

Rohit Singh and ors. Vs. State of Bihar (Now State of Jharkhand) and o ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2007SC10; 2006(6)ALT45(SC); 2007(1)AWC1(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(1)CHN44; JT2006(9)SC145; 2007(I)OLR(SC)266; (2007)146PLR790; 2006(10)SCALE258; 2006(2)LC1363(SC)

that the plaintiff had no cause of action and that the suit was not maintainable for want of notice under Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The suit went to trial. Evidence was closed. Arguments … Procedure. The suit went to trial. Evidence was closed. Arguments concluded. Judgment was reserved.2. At that stage, certain third parties who are the appellants herein, filed an application under Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of … to Held, The Corporation which made a representation and allowed the other party to act upon such representation could not resile and leave the citizens

THREE6 Incommerce Ventures Private Limited vs Decathlon Sports India P ...

Court: Karnataka

IA.3 filed under Order VIII-A Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC, seeking issuance of notice to third party as the defendant is entitled for contribution and indemnity against it.2. Heard K S Devaraj, learned counsel for … VIII-A Rules 1 and 2 read with Section 151 of CPC invoking third party procedure and seekingissuance of notice to third party i.e., Snapdeal. The Trial Court rejected the said application mainly relying on the order of the High Court

Acko Technology and Services Pvt. Ltd. vs Chandra Mohan Mishra & Anr.

Court: Delhi

and has actively taken steps to enforce its rights in the trademark ACKO by sending cease and desist notices to third parties using the mark ACKO and has also filed cancellation/rectificaiton petitions.5. In this petition, grievance of … also in circumstances where he intends, through registration, to lay his hands on the trade mark of a third party with whom he had contractual or pre-contractual relations.30. In the Senso Di Donna Trade Mark case C0006716979/1 [Senso

K P Ramachandran S/O N Sankaran Nair vs Kalappa S/O Byrappa

Court: Karnataka

TITLE AMENDED VIDE COURT ORDER] …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. THIRUMALLESH .K, ADVOCATE FOR R1(1 TO 3); V/O DATED 01.02.2023 NOTICE TO R2 IS D/W) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SEC.96 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 31.10.2011 … is a settled principle that for revocation of an agency to be effective, especially insofar as it affects third- party rights, the same must be clear, unequivocal, and duly communicated. In the absence of such communication, the agent