Noted - Judgment Search Results

Currency Note Press Vs. n.n.sardesai .

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5152 OF2017Currency Note Press & Anr. .. Appellant(s) Versus N.N. Sardesai & Ors. .. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This

Noted Infotech P. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: IV(2008)BC292(SC); (2008)3CompLJ440(SC); 2008(11)SCALE168; (2008)8SCC431; [2008]86SCL207(SC); 2008(8)SCC431; 2008(11)SCALE168

Matched in: Parties Noted Infotech P. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

“further as Noted by the Commissioner the Civil Court Also Held Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

orders before the Financial Commissioner. The said authority, however, dismissed the revision petition observing as follows:- “Further as noted by the Commissioner, the civil court also held that the possession of the plaintiff (present petitioneRs.over the suit

Noted Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer, Sec ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Matched in: Parties Noted Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer, Securities and Exchange Board of India

Continental Bank Note Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Continental Bank Note Co. v. United States - 154 U.S. 671 (1882) U.S. Supreme Court Continental Bank Note Co. v. United

The Confederate Note Case

Court: US Supreme Court

The Confederate Note Case - 86 U.S. 548 (1873) U.S. Supreme Court The Confederate Note Case, 86 U.S. 19 Wall. 548

India Security Press Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Currency Note Press and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1993)IIILLJ58Bom

hours of work is illegal.2. The Petitioners are a trade union representing the workmen in the 1st Respondent-Currency Note Press, and the 2nd Respondent-India Security Press. The Respondents-Presses on 10th Jan. and 29th Jan. 1983, respectively, gave

The Management of Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Limited Vs. P. Sh ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2008KAR3165; 2008(6)KarLJ12; (2009)ILLJ666Kant; 2008(4)KCCRSN324; 2008(4)AIRKarR377; 2008LabIC(NOC)1000(Kar)(DB)

a case for judicial review, was made out before the learned single Judge by the management. As already noted the learned single Judge has modified the award. While affirming reinstatement, he has denied back wages and continuity

Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran Pvt. Ltd. (a Wholly Owned Subsidiar ...

Court: Karnataka

Disputes Act seeking approval of the dismissal of respondents.2. Petitioner is a company engaged in printing of currency notes having its press at Mysore in the State of Karnataka and at Saboni in the State of West

“The First and Foremost Aspect Which Needs to Be Taken Note of Vs. S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

him by the prosecution. Thus, the credibility of this witness is in doubt. One more point to be noted is that the alleged statement of the appellant that the deceased was in a drunken condition cannot be