Noted - Judgment Search Results

Currency Note Press Vs. n.n.sardesai .

Court: Supreme Court of India

REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5152 OF2017Currency Note Press & Anr. .. Appellant(s) Versus N.N. Sardesai & Ors. .. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Abhay Manohar Sapre, J.1. This

Noted Infotech P. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: IV(2008)BC292(SC); (2008)3CompLJ440(SC); 2008(11)SCALE168; (2008)8SCC431; [2008]86SCL207(SC); 2008(8)SCC431; 2008(11)SCALE168

Matched in: Parties Noted Infotech P. Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

“further as Noted by the Commissioner the Civil Court Also Held Vs. ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

orders before the Financial Commissioner. The said authority, however, dismissed the revision petition observing as follows:- “Further as noted by the Commissioner, the civil court also held that the possession of the plaintiff (present petitioneRs.over the suit

Noted Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer, Sec ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Matched in: Parties Noted Infotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs. the Adjudicating and Enquiry Officer, Securities and Exchange Board of India

Continental Bank Note Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Continental Bank Note Co. v. United States - 154 U.S. 671 (1882) U.S. Supreme Court Continental Bank Note Co. v. United

The Confederate Note Case

Court: US Supreme Court

The Confederate Note Case - 86 U.S. 548 (1873) U.S. Supreme Court The Confederate Note Case, 86 U.S. 19 Wall. 548

India Security Press Mazdoor Sangh Vs. Currency Note Press and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1993)IIILLJ58Bom

hours of work is illegal.2. The Petitioners are a trade union representing the workmen in the 1st Respondent-Currency Note Press, and the 2nd Respondent-India Security Press. The Respondents-Presses on 10th Jan. and 29th Jan. 1983, respectively, gave

Sri. Rajaram M Shetty vs Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Ltd,

Court: Karnataka

ROAD, BENGALURU-560029.6. DILIPSING AMARSING PATILAGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, EMPLOYEE NO. 60271 BHARATIYA RESERVE BANK NOTE MUDRAN P LTD., NOTED MUDRAN NAGAR, RBNML PO SALBONI, WEST MIDNAPORE, WEST BENGAL-721132. -3-7. M V RAJANI KANTH AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,

U Bhuvaneshvari vs Bharathiya Reserve Bank Note Mudrana P Ltd

Court: Karnataka

prior permission of the Competent Authority in writing before your date of relieving on transfer.5. It may be noted that no further correspondence andrepresentation in the matter of retention will be entertained by this office. Yours faithfully,

Sri Rajaram M Shetty vs Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Limited

Court: Karnataka

S/O M RAMANNA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, EMPLOYEE NO.20177 WORKING AS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, BHARTIYA RESERVE BANK NOTE MUDRAN (P) LIMITED, NOTE MUDRAN NAGAR, MYSURU-570003 R/AT PRESENTLY E-15, BRBNMPL TOWNSHIP, NOTE MUDRAN NAGAR MYSURU-570003Digitally …PETITIONER signed