Not - Judgment Search Results

Notavailable Vs. Not Available

Court: Chennai

Application Nos.5315 and 5316 of 2013 VINOD K.SHARMA, J.These applications, under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 have been filed for interim direction to the respondent to forthwith release all payments against invoices...

Was Not Being Taught there. thereafter Government Made Vs. State of Ha ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.12757 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATES OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CWP No.12757 of 2011 Date of Decision :23.09.2013 Geeta Rani ...........Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ..........Respondents CORAM:...

Advertisement Have Not Been Fulfilled. a Sequitur Relief Is for Quashi ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Writ Petition No.25217 of 2012 Date of Decision:01. 10.2013 Dr. Rajinder Kumar Singla ..Petitioner Versus Panjab University, Chandigarh and others ..Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE...

“i Do Not Find Any Force in the Contention of the Petitioner That th ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.9490 of 1987 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** CWP No.9490 of 1987 Date of decision : 26.9.2013 Piara Singh alias Piare Lal ........Petitioner versus Additional Director, Consolidation of...

“(Xxv) Not Denied That Sh.Swarn Singh Filed a Complaint Vs. Bhupinde ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

CWP No.2356-CAT of 2003 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANAAT CHANDIGARH Reserved On: 13.02.2014. CWP No.2356-CAT of 2003(O&M) Date of Decision: March 21, 2014. Union of India and another .....PETITIONER (s) Versus Bhupinder...

Shobit Sharma and Ors vs the State (Not of Delhi) and Anr

Court: Delhi

$~80-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 4141/2026 & CRL.M.As. 16744-16745/2026 SHOBIT SHARMA AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sanjay, Advocate with petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR .....Respondents Through:...

Sheo Shankar Kumar Khetan Vs. Name Not Known, Widow of Late Ambika Pra ...

Court: Patna

S.N. Hussain, J.1. This First Appeal has been filed by defendant No. 2 of Title Suit No. 18 of 1988 against the judgment and decree dated 10.06.1991, by which the learned Subordinate Judge-I, Jehanabad, decreed the...

T.V.Sundaram Iyengar and Sons Ltd Vs. Not Applicable

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:19. 04/2013 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE VINOD K.SHARMA Comp.A.415 of 2013 T.V.SUNDARAM IYENGAR AND SONS LTD FOR PETITIONER : T.K.BHASKAR ORDER Comp.A.No.415 of 2013 VINOD K. SHARMA,J., M/s.T.V.Sundram...

T.K.Srinivasan Vs. Not Applicable

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:09. 01.2014 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.R.SHIVAKUMAR C.M.A.No.3279 of 2013 T.K.Srinivasan (aka) T.K.Srinivas Chari ..Appellant Civil Miscellaneous Appeal under Section 8(5)(c) of the Hindu Minority & Guardianship...

Mohd. Miraz @ Munna Vs. State (Not of Delhi)

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001IIIAD(Delhi)437; 90(2001)DLT702

ORDERUsha Mehra, J.1. A person accused of an offence, which involves life imprisonment or jeoparding his personal liberty, has a fundamental right of free legal assistance at State expense. This fundamental right is implicit in the...