Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Nos V And - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 31 1993

Deen Dayal Ojha Vs. Uttar Pradesh Public Service Tribunal No. V, Luckn ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-31-1993

Reported in: AIR1993SC2475; (1994)ILLJ337SC

was appointed as a Constable in the Police Department. 4. Appellant's date of birth as entered in the Vernacular Examination Certificate was 1st November, 1925. The service record of the appellant, it is not disputed, initially had


Jun 05 2024

Sasdasivan vs Manager, Poovachal Rural Housing Co-Operative Society Lt ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-05-2024

/ 15TH JYAISHTA, 1946 WP(C) NO. 26790 OF 2014 PETITIONER: SASDASIVAN, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O GOVINDAN NADIR, KIZHAKKUMKARA VEEDU, INDIRA NAGAR, PANNIYODE P.O, POOVACHAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 575. BY ADV SRI.SREEKANTH S.NAIR RESPONDENTS: 1 MANAGER, POOVACHAL RURAL HOUSING


Feb 29 2008

Deo Narayan Jaiswal Vs. Special Judge (E.C. Act) Court No. 5 and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-29-2008

Reported in: AIR2008All163

3, the parties had agreed that out of 13 respondents impleaded after the death of Bhimraj, only defendant Nos. 1/4, and 1/7 to 1/10 namely Bihari Lal Murari Lal; Purshottam; Moti Lal and Vinod Kumar would remain … the defendants, was the tenant. Earlier the plaintiff had filed a Suit No. 83 of 1977, Deo Narayan v. Bhim Raj for ejectment in Judge Small Causes Court in which parties entered into a compromise under which


18-section briefs on any result in this list

May 04 2009

Bhag Chand Vs. A.D.J. No. 5 and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: May-04-2009

Reported in: AIR2009Raj178; RLW2009(3)Raj2081

Act of 2001 as Sections 6 and 7 of the Act of 1950, having been impliedly repealed, by virtue of Section 29 of the New Act of 2001 as held by the Division Bench in Kamal Kishore's


Apr 25 2008

Bhag Chand S/O Buta Ram Sindhi Vs. Addl. Distt. Judge No. 5 and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Apr-25-2008

Reported in: RLW2008(3)Raj1857

provisional rent at the rate of Rs. 2500/- per month. The application was contested by the defendants on various grounds including that the monthly rent of the disputed shop is in between Rs. 500/- to Rs. 700/-


Aug 12 2009

Geeta Devi (Smt.) Vs. the Additional District and Sessions Judge No. 5 ...

Court: Rajasthan

Decided on: Aug-12-2009

Reported in: 2009(3)WLN566

plaintiff-petitioner, there is a mention of the 'chabutra' being common and running in front of the house bearing Nos. 1933 and 1932.7. On the other hand, the learned Lower Appellate Court observed in Para 6 of the … the 'chabutra' in front of his house bearing No. 1932 so as to make a passage for his vehicle etc., to be taken in side his house bearing No. 1932, rather than leaving in parked on the


Jun 09 2010

Nabeesa W/O. Late Kunjali Hassan Vs. the Fast Track Adalath Team No. V ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jun-09-2010

in the name of a person who was no more, which by itself makes the same null and void in all respects.3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.4. It is evident from Ext. P3 order passed


Dec 26 2012

Baldev Chand Jagota Son of Milkhi Ram Jagota Resident of Jagota Vs. Jo ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-26-2012

under the 1st respondent is erroneous. The petitioner had joined issues on all these contentions raised by respondent Nos.1 to 3 contending that the averments that had been set forth in the petition were true and the … of 2001 Date of Decision.26.12.2012 Baldev Chand Jagota son of Milkhi Ram Jagota resident of Jagota, resident of village Bhabaur Sahib, Tehsil Anandpur Sahib, Distt. Ropar .....Petitioner Versus Joginder Singh, Graduate Tailor Shop No.5, Naya Nangal (through


Mar 05 2014

Orp Head Constable No. 5/164 Manjeet Vs. State of Haryana and Another

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Mar-05-2014

CHANDIGARH228 CWP No.25824 of 2013 Date of Decision : March 05, 2014 ORP Head Constable No.5/164 Manjeet ...PETITIONERS versus State of Haryana and another ....RESPONDENTS CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AUGUSTINE GEORGE MASIH Present : Mr.R.K.Malik, Sr.Advocate, with


Aug 04 2014

“1. Whether the Plaintiffs and Defendant No.5 Are Owners in Vs. Stat ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-04-2014

OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Rs.No.4020 of 2014 (O&M) Date of Decision:4.8.2014 Gurbax Singh and others ..Appellants versus State of Haryana and others ..Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE RAMESHWAR SINGH MALIK Present : Mr.R.D.Bawa, Advocate for


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial