Non User - Judgment Search Results

Bombay Telephone Users' Association and others Vs. Mahanagar Telephone ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1993Bom194; 1992(3)BomCR139

ORDERMrs. Sujata Manohar, J.1. Wehave already dismissed a similar writ petition filed earlier being Writ Petition No. 1326 of 1992 by our judgment and order dated 15-6-1992. The only additional point urged in these two writ...

Perali Water User Association, Guntur and anr. Vs. Government of Andhr ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2002(3)ALT636

of national policy and national security and the procedural limitations of judicial review may also render certain issues non-justiciable.14. In Pennar Delta Ayacutdars Association v. Govt. of Andhra Pradesh3, a Division Bench of this Court, to which … ORDERBACKGROUND FACTS 1. The petitioners 2 to 52 are members of the first petitioner association (Perali Water Users Association No.130) and they are ayacutdars of irrigation channel called P.T.Channel which is part of Krishna Western Delta

Water Users' Association, Peddacheruvu, Maddulaparva Village, Krishna ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1998(5)ALD238

of the aforementioned principles, let me now refer to the facts of this case. The petitioner is Water Users' Association, Peddacheruvu in Maddulaparva village. In its representation dated 7-8-1998 submitted to the Assistant Director, Fisheries Department, Machilipatnam,

Magnet Users Association Vs. Designated Authority

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(157)ELT150TriDel

cannot be enhanced in a review proceeding, the Designated Authority was in error in treating China as a non-market economy, the working out of the normal value of Chinese goods has been done without proper basis, imposition … 1. This appeal of M/s. Magnet Users Association is directed against the Customs Notification No. 123/2001-Cus., dated 12-12-2001 and Final Findings dated 23rd October, 2001

Magnet Users Association Vs. Ministry of Finance Designated

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2003)(90)ECC602

cannot be enhanced in a review proceeding, the Designated Authority was in error in treating China as a non-market economy, the working out of the normal value of Chinese goods has been done without proper basis, imposition … 1. This appeal of M/s Magnet Users Association is directed against the Custom Notification No. 123/2001-Cus dated 12.12.2001 and Final Findings dated 23rd October 2001

Highway Users' Centres (i) Ltd. Vs. Securities And Exchange Board Of I ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2005)60SCL164SAT

1. The appeal is taken up with the consent of parties. This appeal is directed against the impugned order dated 24.4.03 directing the appellant to wind up the existing scheme and to refund the money collected...

State of Gujarat Vs. Utility Users Welfare Association Through Its Pre ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

element requiring a legal mind. This is apart from the fact that it is not as if a non-lawyer or non-Judge is incapable of appreciating a legal point, as even arbitrators are appointed from these fields when … INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.14697 of 2015 REPORTABLE STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ….Appellants versus UTILITY USERS’ WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS. ….Respondents With C.A. No.13451/2015 T.C.(C) No.139/2015 T.C.(C) No.138/2015 T.C.(C) No.137/2015 T.C.(C) No.140/2015 C.A. No.3759-3760/2016

Narayan Das Shukla and ors. Vs. Water Users Association,singhpur and o ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

W.P.No.3874 / 2002 (Narayan Das Shukla & others ..Vs..Water Users Association, Singhpur, District Shahdol & another) 07-08-2012 Shri Brijesh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.None for the respondents.

Abp Private Limited Vs. Media Research Users Council

Court: Kolkata

arbitration agreement shall a party be referred to arbitration. Section 8(2) of 1996 Act is mandatory and for non-filing the original arbitration agreement or a certified copy thereof with the instant application this application cannot be maintained. … HON’BLE JUSTICE PATHERYA G.A.No.3966 of 2008 G.A.No.3729 of 2008 C.S.No.242 of 2008 ABP Private Limited versus Media Research Users Council FOR THE PLAINTIFF/ PETITIONER : Mr.Anindya Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Tilak Bose, Adv.Mr.Anubhav Sinha, Adv.Mr.Soumitra Datta, Adv.FOR THE DEFENDANT/ RESPONDENT

Sebi Vs. Highway Users' Centres (India)

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as SEBI) received complaints from investors pertaining to the non payment of the principal and interest of their investments in Highway Infrastructure Development Bond of the company. In … 1.1 M/s Highway Users' Centres (India) Limited (hereinafter referred to as the company) is a company registered under the provisions of the