Non Performance - Judgment Search Results

Phonographic Performance Ltd. Vs. Music Broadcast (P) Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2004(3)ALLMR196; 2004(29)PTC282(Bom)

various cities. It appears that these organisations which were granted licences for establishing FM Broadcasting Services approached M/s.Phonographic Performance Ltd. (Hereinafter referred to PPL for the sake of brevity), which holds copyright in sound recording for grant … in public or communicate the work to the public by (broadcast), as the case may be, subject to payment to the owner of the copyright of such compensation and subject to such other terms and conditions as

Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. Vs. C.C.E.C.,Vapi

Court: Supreme Court of India

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5805-5807 OF2009|SARLA PERFORMANCE FIBERS LTD. |.....APPELLANT(S)

Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. Vs. Sanjay Dalia and Anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

been conferred under section 62(2) of the Copyright Act and section 134 of the Trade Marks Act containing non-obstante clause to the applicability of the Code of Civil Procedure or any other law for the time being … Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS.10643-10644 OF2010Indian Performing Rights Society Ltd. ... Appellant Vs. Sanjay Dalia & Anr. ... Respondents (With C.A. No.4912/2015 @ SLP [C].

Sarla Performance Fibers Ltd. Etc. Vs. C.C.E., Surat-Ii

Court: Supreme Court of India

the appellant which is a continuing EOU, was bound to export finished goods and as there has been non- fulfilment of the obligation and the goods have been cleared without permission of the competent authority, the appellants … REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3555-3560 OF2012Sarla Performance Fibers Limited ... Appellant(s) Etc. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, ... Respondent(s) Surat-II JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, J.The appellant

Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. Vs. Eastern Indian Motion Picture ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1977SC1443; (1977)2SCC820; [1977]3SCR206

limited by guarantee, for the purpose of carrying on business in India of issuing or granting licences for performance in public of all existing and future Indian Musical works in which copyright subsists in India. The incorporation … music director sets it to tunes and imparts music to it and a singer sings the same but none of them nor any one of their aforesaid works can and have any separate copyrights; that motion picture

Performing Right Society Ltd. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC1973; [1977]106ITR11(SC); (1976)4SCC37; [1977]1SCR171a; 1976(8)LC745(SC)

of the Society, and (b) to utilize, solely, for the purpose of sound broadcasting as aforesaid, any originating performance of such musical works, irrespective of the source of such performance and the means whereby the such performance … suits and other proceedings, engage lawyers, and sign plaints, petitions etc. Prior to July, 1967 the Society, a non-resident company, used to file its returns of income before the Income-tax Officer, Madras, through its former agent in

Phonographic Performance Limited Vs. Tv Today Network Limited and Anr.

Court: Kolkata

2015 CS No.135 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LIMITED -VersusTV TODAY NETWORK LIMITED & ANR. Appearance: Mr.Abhrajit Mitra, Sr.Adv.Mr.Sarvapriyo Mukherjee, Adv.Mr.Satadeep Bhattacharyya, Adv.Mr.Sarajit Biswas, Adv...for the … after the close of every quarter of the year to such sum for which complainant was liable for payment of compensation for that quarter. Quarter of a year means a period of three months ending on the

Phonographic Performance Ltd vs.ht Media Ltd

Court: Delhi

$~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 2749/2011 PHONOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr N. B. Joshi and Ms Neena K. Gupta, Advocates. HT MEDIA LTD versus … to administer. I do not think this constitutes an alternation of the nature of the suit at all. None of the rights of the Defendants are prejudiced in any manner if the amendment is allowed. As against

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd vs.anil Mehra & Anr

Court: Delhi

CPC), the defendants, instead of being restrained as was sought, were as an interim arrangement directed to make payment at certain rates to the plaintiff.6. have been making the said payment till now.7. order dated 10th May, … $~8 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CS(OS) 632/2006 THE INDIAN PERFORMING RIGHT SOCIETY LTD ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Dayan Krishnan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Anu Bagai, Mr. Himanshu Bagai

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd vs.aditya Pandey and Anr

Court: Delhi

having no jurisdiction is a nullity. Applying the said principles, it was held that a suit for specific performance of an Agreement of a Sale of immovable property can be instituted only at the place where the … Does this Court has jurisdiction to entertain and try the present suit?. OPP.2.3. Is the suit bad for non-joinder of parties?. OPD. Does the plaintiff prove its entitlement to any of the reliefs claimed?. OPP.4. Does the