Non Issue - Judgment Search Results
issu Alias Ismile Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Dec-12-2012
Criminal Revision No.1382/12 12.12.2012. Shri Manish Tiwari, learned counsel for petitioner. State/respondent by Shri Akshay Namdeo, learned PL. Learned PL appearing for the State prays for short time to call for the Surgical Expert Report. Let...
“i) to Issue a Writ of Certiorari for Quashing the Vs. Jagbir Singh ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jul-17-2013
authorities shall prepare record qua the land under river action. By noting that dispute is on account of non-preparation of record of rights by the Revenue authorities, as per the provisions of Section 32 and 33 of … under the 'river action', record has not been prepared, to affect consolidation, by the Revenue authorities, despite directions issued by this Court in CWP No.8979 of 2009 titled as 'Charan Singh and others v. State of Haryana
That Issue of Paddy to Be Limited to the Extent of Costs of Vs. Food C ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-13-2013
Name of FCI Depot/ ety in rate sport of FCI, District Centre of of Qtls. ation Paddy SWC, issue of Padd , if which CWC, Paddy y any can be Depot milled Centre of upto delivery 30.3.1 … not be illegal. Same is not the position in the case before me because only inference due to non-supply of the requisite 200 MT of paddy is drawable is breach of the terms of the contract agreement
18-section briefs on any result in this list
“basically the Issue Involved in the Present Writ Petition Is Whethe ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-04-2014
order dated 16.08.2013 (Annexure P13), whereby respondent No.1 decided to maintain status quo on its earlier decision, regarding non extention of approval, issued vide order dated 31.12.2012, which was subsequently confirmed on 16.03.2013, in respect of the … P13), whereby respondent No.1 decided to maintain status quo on its earlier decision, regarding non extention of approval, issued vide order dated 31.12.2012, which was subsequently confirmed on 16.03.2013, in respect of the petitioner, on account of
The Only Issue on Which the Respondent No.1 Approached the Vs. Darshan ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-19-2014
Mr.Deepak Sharma, Advocate, for the petitioneRs.Mr.Aman Chaudhary, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SANJAY KISHAN KAUL C.J.(Oral) The only issue on which the respondent No.1 approached the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench was qua the fixation of his
“The Issue Whether the Order Passed in Proceeding Under Section 7 Vs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-13-2014
of the Act, has not been decided. Therefore, whether such land was used for common purposes was an issue, which is required to be decided by the Authorities under the Act. In view of the said finding, … No.7133 of 2010 preferred against the said order, the order passed by the Commissioner was set aside, when none had put in appearance on behalf of the Panchayat before this Court. The argument on behalf of the
While Issuing Notice of Motion the Following Order Was Passed Vs. Stat ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-13-2014
Present:- Mr.Pritam Saini, Advocate for the petitioneRs.Mr.Vaibhav Sharma, D.A.G., Punjab. *** TEJINDER SINGH DHINDSA.J Inspite of service, no appearance is caused on behalf of respondent no.2. The instant petition has been filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C praying … Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, registered at Police Station, Sohana, District S.A.S.Nagar, Mohali. While issuing notice of motion, the following order was passed by this Court on 4.12.2013:- “The petitioners pray for grant
The Principal Issue Raised in the Present Petition Was a Vs. Union of ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-19-2014
respondents No.3 and 6 alongwith Annexures and the applications are allowed. CWP No.27324 of 2013 (O&M) The principal issue raised in the present petition was a grievance made by the petitioner on account of lack of enforcement
“all these Issues Are Taken Up Together Being Inter- Vs. State of Pu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-28-2014
when it has not been rebutted by the respondent?. (iii) Whether adveRs.inference can be drawn on account of non-response to the notice u/s 80 CPC in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the present case?. Singh Rattan … dismissal of the suit was prayed for. On the basis of the pleadings of the parties, the following issues were framed by the trial Court: 1. Whether the plaintiff is owner of the land measuring 23 Kanals
In Re: Vs. To Issue Certain Guidelines Regarding Inadequacies and Defi ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-30-2017
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION SUO MOTU WRIT(CRL.) NO.1 OF2017IN RE: TO ISSUE CERTAIN GUIDELINES REGARDING INADEQUACIES AND DEFICIENCIES IN CRIMINAL TRIALS ORDER During the course of hearing of Criminal Appeal
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free