Non Employment - Judgment Search Results

Employers in Relation to the Management of Flaritand Colliery of Bccl ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2002(50)BLJR1351; [2002(94)FLR644]; (2002)IIILLJ175Jhar

the action of the management of Fularitand Colliery of M/s. B.C.C.L., P.O. Nawagrah. District Dhanbad in stopping from employment the workmen whose names are given in annexure with effect from 19.12.1983 is justified? If not to what … the former and not to the latter. (iv) An order perusing special leave to appeal may be a non-speaking order or a speaking one. In either case it does not attract the doctrine of merger. An order

Employers in Relation to the Management of Nirsa Area of Eastern Coalf ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2003(2)BLJR1602; [2003(3)JCR189(Jhr)]

No. 43/1990, whereby and whereunder, while he held the action of the Management of Badjna Colliery in denying employment to Basudeo Bhuiyan and 682 others not justified, directed the petitioner management to employ at least 105 to … the members of the Bench, cannot be a ground for review of the impugned judgment. Punishment of prohibiting appearance of contemner/lawyer before High Court as well as courts under its jurisdiction is based on his repeated convictions

Employers in Relation to the Management of Bhuli Township Administrati ...

Court: Jharkhand

Reported in: 2003(3)BLJR2058; [2003(4)JCR34(Jhr)]; (2004)ILLJ554Jhar

rendered in Air India Statutory Corporation v. United Labour Union, reported in (1997) 9 SCC 377, if the employment was of perennial nature, contract system stands abolished and therefore the contract labours are required to be regularized; … INDIA. Articles 12 & 226: [M. Karpaga Vinayagam, C.J., Narendra Nath Tiwari & D.P.Singh, JJ] Writ petition - Maintainability - Whether State Co-operative Milk Producers Federation Ltd., is a State within meaning of Article 12 ? -

Workmen of Calcutta Dock Labour Board and anr. Vs. Employers in Relati ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC2251; [1973(26)FLR444]; (1973)IILLJ254SC; (1974)3SCC216; 1973(1)SLJ1044(SC)

the regularity of employment of Dock Workers under the two Schemes of 1956 and 1957 and though the payment of wages was made from the Office of the Dock Labour Board, the funds were obtained from the

Sri Thammaiah S. S/O Siddaiah, Rtd. Visl Employer Vs. Sri Raju S/O A.K ...

Court: Karnataka

his evidence he is required to pay the stamp duty in accordance with Article 20 of the Act None of these documents are agreement of safe nor they relate to part performance of the Contract. They do … cum Operator drawing salary of Rs.4,592/- per month as per the Salary Statement Ex.P 13 issued by the employer PW-3. When such being the case, the Tribunal -is not justified in assessing the income of the deceased

Employers In Relation To The Management Of Bhalgora Area (now Kustore ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

the BCCL is required to process their recruitment, by notifying the vacancies and requisitioning names from the jurisdictional Employment Exchange, under the provisions of the Employment Exchange (Compulsory Notification of Vacancies) Act, 1959 (for short, ‘the 1959 … stage would suggest that they were conscious and Page 12 of 17 aware of being appointed through a non-bonafide process. In any case, the appointments were contrary to the requirements of the 1959 Act.15. In Union of

Employer in Relation to Management of Katras Area of M/S Bharat Coking ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1481

Aryan Sharma. Advs. for the Respondent: Rajan Raj, Ms. Mohini Priya.Judgment / Order of the Supreme CourtOrder1. The employer is the appellant and assails the correctness of the judgment and order dated 06.09.2023 passed by the Division

Employers, Mgmt., M. Colliery, Bccl Ltd. Vs. Bihar Colliery Kamgar Uni ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC2006; 2005(1)BLJR502; [2005(104)FLR1224]; [2006(2)JCR151(SC)]; JT2005(2)SC444; (2005)ILLJ1135SC; (2005)3SCC331; (2005)2UPLBEC1102

misconduct such as acts of violence against the management or disorderly behavior in or near the place of employment, which though not directly causing damage, is conducive to grave indiscipline, then his gratuity can be forfeited in … it is contended that the reduction of punishment of dismissal into stoppage of one increment is perverse.12. Unfortunately, none appeared for the workmen in this case.13. It is well established principle in law that in a given

Employers in Relation to the Management of Sudamdih Colliery of Bharat ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC946; 2006(2)ALD25(SC); 2006(1)BLJR197; [2006(1)JCR250(SC)]; JT2006(1)SC411; (2006)ILLJ820SC; 2006(1)SCALE284; (2006)2SCC329; 2006(3)SLJ428(SC)

was referred to the Industrial Tribunal cum-Labour Court. We do not think that the appellants deserve to be non suited on the ground of delay.10. It appears that the Tribunal and the High Court did not consider … 1989 dated 16th March, 1989:1. Whether the action of the management of Sudamdih Colliery of M/s in denying employment to Shri Karma Rout and 21 others with effect from 9.7.1977 is justified? If not, to what relief

Employers Management West Bokaro Colliery of Tisco Ltd. Vs. Concerned ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2008SC1162; 2008(56)BLJR1286; 2008BusLR359(SC); [2008(116)FLR1108]; [2008(2)JCR5(SC)]; JT2008(2)SC272; (2009)ILLJ220SC; (2008)3MLJ61(SC); RLW2008(3)SC2083; 2008(2)SCALE1; 2008(3)SCC729; 2008-II-LLJ-309; 2008(2)Supreme28

Ashok Bhan, J.1. Leave granted.Management is in appeal.The respondent-workman was working as Senior Dumper Operator under the Management of the appellant. The workman was deputed at Open Caste Mine, West Bokaro on 2nd of March, 1994...