Non Ability - Judgment Search Results

Abil vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

/ 1ST BHADRA, 1945 BAIL APPL. NO. 7109 OF 2023 CRIME NO.1032/2023 OF Ernakulam Central Police Station, ErnakulamPETITIONER/ACCUSED: ABIL AGED 24 YEARS KURIYAPADATH HOUSE, KUNNUKARA VILLAGE, KUNNUKARA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 680734 BY ADV MARY RANZOM LOUIZ RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

Abil Security Services vs the Assistant Commissioner (St)

Court: Chennai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 10-06-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHYAbil Security Services Rep. by its Proprietor, Aruldevaraj Suriya, No.4/31, Devin House, Bharathiyar Street, Palavakkam, Chennai 600041 ..Petitioner(s) Vs ..Respondent(s) PRAYER: Writ Petition...

Abil Baby vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

APPL. NO. 3559 OF 2022 CRIME NO.137/2022 OF Erumapetty Police Station, Thrissur PETITIONERS/ACCUSED Nos. 1 & 2: 1 ABIL BABY AGED 26 YEARS, S/O. BABY, KUTTIKKATTIL HOUSE, KIRALOOR VILLAGE, DESOM, KUNNAMKULAM TALUK, KIRALOOR P.O.,PIN - 680601 2

Abil Paul vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

CC 628/2021 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR CRIME NO.1682/2020 OF KUNNAMKULAM POLICE STATION PETITIONERS/ACCUSED: 1 ABIL PAUL AGED 33 YEARS S/O. PAUL VARGHESE, PANANJIKKAL VEEDU, MALAYATTUR, MALAYATTUR 2 PAUL VARGHESE, AGED 67 YEARS S/O.

National Ability S.A. Vs. Tinna Oil and Chemicals Ltd. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008(3)ARBLR37(Delhi); 2008(105)DRJ446

of the Bank was justified, it will be a travesty of justice if the Bank is to be non suited for a technical reason which does not go to the root of the matter and the only … and following the instructions given to Ms. Juliet Sarah Blanch, Solicitor & Partner with Norton Rose, by National Ability SA to enforce the Award, I affirm that Ms. Juliet Sarah Blanch had the necessary authority from, and

Abilities (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and 3 ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1989(20)LC386(Allahabad)

be released to the petitioner.2. A copy of this order may be given to the petitioner, today on payment of usual charges. The petitioner will produce a copy of this order before the respondent No. 2 within

Abilities (India) Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(97)ELT461TriDel

1. The appellants are manufacturers among other piston used in motor vehicles. They claimed classification of pistons under Heading 8708 as parts of motor vehicles. This claim has been rejected by department on the ground that...

Abilities India Pistons and Rings Vs. Commr. of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(118)ELT430TriDel

1. The applicant filed this application for waiver of pre-deposit of duty demand of Rs. 1697.00.2. In this case in the impugned order it was held that Exhaust Fan is not eligible for the MODVAT credit...

Abilities India Pistons and Rings Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(120)ELT384TriDel

1. The appellants are engaged in the manufacture of Bare Piston & Piston assembly falling under Chapters 84 and 87 of the Schedule to the Central Excise Tariff Act. They are availing Modvat facility on capital...

Abilities (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1984)(16)ELT619TriDel

that the show cause notice was time-barbed as it was issued beyond 6 months from the date of payment of duty. The Assistant Collector negated this contention and by his order dated 31-3-1981 confirmed the demand, the