Niceness - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Nice

Court: US Supreme Court

United States v. Nice - 241 U.S. 591 (1916) U.S. Supreme Court United States

Nice Mathew vs State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

/ 18TH POUSHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 476 OF 2024 PETITIONER: NICE MATHEW,AGED 60 YEARS S/O T.T.MATHEW, THAKADIYIL HOUSE, GANGOTHRI NAGAR, PUTHUR,

Nice Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer (int)-18 South Zon ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: [2006]148STC296(Kar)

ORDERD.V. Shylendra Kumar, J.1. The Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957 (for short, 'the Act') was undoubtedly a piece of legislation...

Nice Rubber Vs. the Presiding Officer and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2003VAD(Delhi)412; 104(2003)DLT585; 2003(67)DRJ688; (2003)IIILLJ322Del

S.K. Mahajan, J.1. Rule.2. With the consent of the parties, the matter has been heard and disposed of by this...

Anghinghu Nice Tobacco (Firm) Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1999)(82)LC746Tri(Chennai)

1. The appellant is absent in spite of notice of hearing, but has made written submissions and prayed for disposal...

Nice Foto Lab Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2002)(141)ELT786Tri(Chennai)

order of the original authority in the case of M/s. Nice Foto Lab and in the case of Dr.Reddy's Laboratories the

Nice Paper Mills Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

1. Both the appeals, one filed by the appellant and other by revenue are being taken up together for disposal...

Nice Telecommunication Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2007)8STT159

1. In this case, the appellant availed Cenvat credit on mobile telephone used in rendering their output services. The central...

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Nice Steel Industries

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(91)ECC668

involved is whether the Chaf Cutter Blades, manufactured by M/s. Nice Steel Industries, are classifiable under Heading No. 84.36 of the

M/S. Golden Rubber Industries Vs. M/S. Nice Rubber Industries and Anot ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

the words “NICE RUBBER INDUSTRIES” in place of the word NICE appearing on the mark applied for under the provision of