New Assignment - Judgment Search Results

Alankit Assignments Ltd. Vs. Joint Cit

Court: Delhi

Reported in: (2004)89TTJ(Del)1053

up by the following corporate shareholders :S. No.Name of the companyAmount of investment in share capital of Alankit Assignments Ltd. added on protective basis Rs.1. Real Overseas (P) Ltd. 3,00,0002. Parul Poly Products (P) Ltd. 5,00,0003. Garg

Alankit Assignments Ltd Vs. Cdr S.P. Puri (Retd) and anr

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 147/2010 Reserved on: January 20, 2012. Decision on: February 10, 2012. ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Petitioner … OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI O.M.P. 147/2010 Reserved on: January 20, 2012. Decision on: February 10, 2012. ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. J.P. Sengh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Kshitiz Khera, Ms. Mithu Jain, Mr. Sumeet

The Official Assigns of the Calcutta High Court Vs. Bidyasundari Dasi ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 54Ind.Cas.700

of creditors and that the lady was never in possession of the properties ostensibly transferred to her. The new evidence together with these findings has been made part of the record and the appeal has been argued … guess. On the 5th July 1911 Raimohan was adjudged an insolvent and his assets vested in the Official Assignee of this Court. On the 21st November 1911 Bidyasundari executed a deed of gift in favour of Raimohan.

Assigned Car Cases

Court: US Supreme Court

249 U. S. 562 ; or to question the wisdom of regulations which it prescribes, United States v. New River Co., 265 U. S. 533 , 265 U. S. 542 . Page 274 U. S. 581 These … January 25, 1907, pp. 49-81; April 28, 1908; June 9, 1914, 31 I.C.C.193, 217, 224; also In re Assignment of Freight Cars, 57 I.C.C. 760. [ Footnote 4 ] Between April 28, 1908, and the date of

K. K. Chakraborty vs.alankit Assignments Ltd.

Court: Delhi

$~11 * I N T HE HI GH CO URT O F DE LHI AT NEW DE LH I Judgment pronounced on :7. h August, 2018 + LPA7292017 K. K. CHAKRABORTY Through : Ms. … :7. h August, 2018 + LPA7292017 K. K. CHAKRABORTY Through : Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate. .....Appellant Versus ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ....Respondent Through : Mr. Siddharth Sharma, Advocate with Ms. Shruti Arora, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE G.

Cmdr. S.P. Puri Vs. Alankit Assignments Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008(3)ARBLR465(Delhi); 2008(105)DRJ635

was assured a fixed return of interest @ 24% per annum by the respondent and as a gullible new entrant made investments on different dates, signed three different Agreements, was given a client number and Speed-e facility … impugned Award, the Arbitral Tribunal has rejected claims of the Objector and allowed counter claim of respondent-M/s. Alankit Assignments Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as 'respondent or AAL', for short) of Rs. 32,72,631/- less Rs. 15,00,000/- deposited by

Shivam Sharma vs.m/s Alankit Assignments Ltd.

Court: Delhi

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + % SHIVAM SHARMA FAO No.75/2017 13th July, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate. Through: versus … % SHIVAM SHARMA FAO No.75/2017 13th July, 2017 ..... Appellant Mr. Vivek Singh, Advocate. Through: versus M/S ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Pratiksha Chaturvedi, Advocate. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA To be referred to

K K Chakraborty vs.m/s. Alankit Assignments Ltd.

Court: Delhi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on :06. h September, 2017 Date of decision :18. h September, 2017 W.P.(C) 7859/2017 K … h September, 2017 W.P.(C) 7859/2017 K K CHAKRABORTY ........ Petitioner Through Ms. Deepali Gupta, Advocate versus M/S. ALANKIT ASSIGNMENTS LTD. ..... Respondent Through CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ANU MALHOTRA Nemo. ANU MALHOTRA, J.JUDGMENT1 Vide the present petition,

Tilak Rethesh N. vs the Tahsildar (Land Assignment)

Court: Kerala

AGED 46 YEARS 2 AVINASH N. AGED 42 YEARS BY ADV K.K.MOHAMED RAVUF RESPONDENTS: 1 THE TAHSILDAR (LAND ASSIGNMENT) MANJESWARAM TALUK, MANJESWARAM (PART OF FORMER KASARGOD TALUK), KASARGOD DISTRICT, PIN - 671121 2 THE TAHSILDAR KASARGOD TALUK,

Darsi Ragamma, W/O. Late Rangaiah Upparapalem and D. Arun Kumar, S/O. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2004(4)ALD488

if any, would be only with regard to the procedural and machinery provisions contained therein but thereby no new right could be created. Even if the provisions of O.23, R.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure and/or … Petitions are disposed of by this common order.2. One Rangaiah, husband of first petitioner, applied to Tahsildar for assignment of Government land. Petitioners alleged that the Tahsildar assigned the land admeasuring Ac.1.00 in S.No.1508/2 and Acs.1.08 in