Never - Judgment Search Results
“that the Petitioner Has Never Applied for Requisite Change of Vs. D ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-04-2012
Land Use Certificate'. It is stated as under :- CWP No.4349 of 2012 -2- “That the petitioner has never applied for requisite Change of Land use permission as per the provisions of Rule-26A of Punjab Scheduled Roads
The Respondent-workman Never Had Been in the Vs.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-19-2013
ex- parte vide award dated 3.3.2009. Contention of the appellant management is two fold:- 1. The appellant-management had never been served in the proceedings; and 2. The respondent-workman never had been in the employment of the appellant.
Neelam P. Chawla Vs. Godavari V. Nagpal (Since Deceased but Never Disc ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Jul-09-2012
Matched in: Parties Neelam P. Chawla Vs. Godavari V. Nagpal (Since Deceased but Never Disclosed) and Others
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free