Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-20-2022
..... than economic or pecuniary... 33 14.4. we have no hesitation in endorsing the views of full bench decision of bombay high court in the case of jagan gagansingh nepali @ jagya (supra). looking to the object and purpose of this enactment, the expression other advantage cannot be read in a restrictive manner and is required to be ..... or other advantage apart from pecuniary benefit. 14.3. this aspect has gone into consideration of the full bench of bombay high court in the case of jagan gagansingh nepali @ jagya (supra), wherein the court examined precisely the connotations of the expression other advantage occurring in section 2(1)(d) of the act. the question formulated had ..... learned counsel for the respondent-state has referred to the decision of the full bench of the bombay high court in the case of state of maharashtra v. jagan gagansingh nepali @ jagya & anr.: (2011) scc online bombay 1049 to submit that therein, the bombay high court has held that crimes of bodily offence could be the crimes .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-24-2022
..... r/o village koteshwar, district kathmandu, nepal, aged about 15 years. the investigation was carried out by maintaining all decency through meera sauda, who was well conversant with hindi and nepali languages. she disclosed to the police party that on 10.04.2015, she came all alone to see her uncle namely arjun sharma, who was a teacher in lamki (nepal .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Oct-19-2022
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3795 OF2014M/S NEW NOBLE EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX1AND ANR. RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.3793 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.3794 OF2014CIVIL APPEAL No.9108 OF2012CIVIL APPEAL No.6418 OF2012J U D G M E NT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.1. It has been said that education is the key that unlocks the golden door to freedom.1 In Avinash Mehrotra v Union of India2, this court underlined the object and value of education in the following words:1. n aphorism common to all faiths. Proverb 4:13 states, Take hold of instruction, do not let go. Guard her, for she is your life. The Pavamana Mantras (purifying mantras) appealing to be taken from darkness to light in Brihadaranyaka Upanishad, as part of verse 1.3.28 too emphasizes the value of knowledge and education, Lead me from the darkness of ignorance to the light (of knowledge). Surah Al-Baqarah, gives an important inter...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-02-2022
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Miscellaneous Application No 735 of 2022 in Writ Petition (Civil) No 124 of 2022 Neppali Sai Vikash & Ors .... Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India & Ors ....Respondent(s) JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1The Miscellaneous Application seeks revival of the petition under Article 32 of the Constitution. The petition was disposed of by an order dated 14 March 2022. 2 The grievance in the petition was that there were vacant post graduate medical seats and a reduction in the percentile fixed for eligibility will ensure that more candidates become eligible to fill up the vacancies. 3 The Union Government in the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare1 took a decision on 12 March 2022 to carry out a reduction of 15 percentile across all categories for admission to NEET PG courses. For the general category, the cut- 1 MoH&FW 2 off percentile has been fixed at 35, for the physically handicapped category at 30 and for the r...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-09-2022
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION I.A. No.61370 of 2021 [Report No.06 0f 2021]. In Application No.1440 of 2020 I.A. No.107884 of 2021 and I.A. No.30853 & 30858 of 2022 In Writ Petition (Civil) No.202 of 1995 In the Matter of: T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD .... Petitioners (s) Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. & ORS. . Respondent (s) ORDER1 In Interlocutory Application (I.A.) No.1308 of 2005 and other connected I.A.s in Writ Petition (C) No.202 of 1995, this Court on 05.10.2015 directed the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL) to furnish a copy of the orders passed by it relating to matters of National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries. The Central Empowered Committee (CEC) was given liberty to 1 | Pa ge approach this Court by filling an appropriate application, if they were not satisfied with the decision of the Standing Committee of NBWL while other aggrieved parties were given the liberty to approach the appropriate forum.2. In its 56th meeting held on 17...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-02-2022
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.1627-1628 of 2022 (@ Diary No.19961 of 2020) Binay Kumar Dalei & Ors. .... Appellant(s) Versus State of Odisha & Ors. . Respondent(s) JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, J.1. Rural Organisation for Social Empowerment - Respondent No.8 herein, filed Original Application No.02 of 2019 before the National Green Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter, the NGT) for a direction to the opposite parties therein to cancel the stone quarry leases granted pursuant to an advertisement dated 17.08.2017. Respondent No.8 also sought for a direction that no further lease shall be granted in the Kuldiha Wildlife Sanctuary and the eco-sensitive zone lined to it, 1 | Pag e as were notified in the notification dated 09.08.2017. It was further prayed that an enquiry should be conducted into the illegal and unlawful advertisement for long term leases in the wildlife sanctuary. During the pendency of the Original App...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-12-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5443 OF2019PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LIMITED ..... APPELLANT VERSUS VENKATESWARLU KARI AND ANOTHER ..... RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT SANJIV KHANNA, J.The primary legal issue which arises for consideration in this appeal is whether the Depositories Act, 1996 read with the Regulation 58 of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Depositories and Participants) Regulations, 19961 has the legal effect of overwriting the provisions relating to the contracts of pledge under the Indian Contract Act, 18722 and the common law as applicable in India. To facilitate analysis, this judgment has been divided into sections as follows:1. For short, 1996 Regulations. 2 For short, Contract Act. Civil Appeal No.5443 of 2019 Page 1 of 86 A. Factual background of the case B. Relevant provisions of the Contract Act C. Analysis of case laws under the Contract Act: (i) What is pledge and the legal difference between ownership...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on : Mar-14-2022
1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE14H DAY OF MARCH, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.100704 OF2021BETWEEN:1. VARALAKSHMI W/O CHANDRASHEKHARA GOUDA AGED ABOUT60YEARS, OCC.: HOUSE WIFE, R/O.1/134, G.C. COLONY, UNDABANDA, VIDAPANAKAL MANDAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH DISTRICT 515 870.2. CHANDRASHEKHAR GOUDA S/O.LATE BASAVANNA GOUDA AGED ABOUT67YEARS, OCC.: AGRICULTURIST, R/O.1/134, G.C.COLONY, UNDABANDA, VIDAPANAKAL MANDAL ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH DISTRICT 515 870.3. PRATHYUSHA D/O.CHANDRASHEKHAR GOUDA AGED ABOUT24YEARS, OCC.: STUDENT, R/O.1/134, G.C. COLONY, UNDABANDA VILLAGE, VIDAPANAKAL MANDALAM, 2 URURAKONDA, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT 515 870, ANDHRA PRADESH DISTRICT.4. SMT.SHWETHA W/O.C.DEVA GOUDA AGED ABOUT28YEARS, OCC.: HOUSE WIFE, YELUBENCHI VILLAGE, BALLARI, NOW R/AT.R/O.FLAT NO,.105, ADITYA BLUE MOON APARTMENTS, WHITE FIELD, BENGALURU 560 066. ... PETITIONERS (BY KUM.ARCHANA A.MAGADUM, ADVOCATE)...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : May-10-2022
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU R DATED THIS THE10H DAY OF MAY, 2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION No.521 OF2022BETWEEN:1. MR.MOHAMMED SHAMEER S/O MOHAMMED MUNEER AGED ABOUT29YEARS R/A RAMDAS COMPOUND KOTWAL NAGAR4H CROSS CHITRADURGA DISTRICT KARNATAKA.2. MR. MOHAMMED MUNNEER S/O LATE MAHAMMED AMEER, AGED ABOUT54YEARS, R/A RAMDAS COMPOUND, KOTWAL NAGAR, 4TH CROSS, CHITRADURGA KARNATAKA.3. MRS.KHAMAR TAJ W/O MOHAMMED MUNEER AGED ABOUT53YEARS R/A RAMDAS COMPOUND KOTWAL NAGAR, 4TH CROSS CHITRADURGA KARNATAKA.4. MRS.MUSHTARI BEGUM W/O MOHAMAD AMEER, AGED ABOUT80YEARS, R/A RAMDAS COMPOUND, 2 KOTWAL NAGAR, 4TH CROSS, CHITRADURGA KARNATAKA.5. MR. MUHAMAD SABEER S/O MAHAMMED MUNEER AGED ABOUT24YEARS R/A RAMDAS COMPOUND KOTWAL NAGAR, 4TH CROSS CHITRADURGA KARNATAKA.6. MRS. AYISHA SIDDIKKA W/O MAHAMMED HARUN AGED ABOUT26YEARS R/A KALIDASA NAGAR1T MAIN, 3RD CROSS HARIHARA, DAVANAGERE KARNATAKA.7. MR.MAHAMMED HAROON S/O MAHAMMED HANIF AGED ABOUT27YE...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Apr-27-2022
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.2042 of 2022 Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. Appellant Versus M/s Discovery Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Respondents With T.C.(C) No.48/2016 With T.C.(C) No.47/2016 With T.C.(C) No.49/2016 And With T.C.(C) No.50/2016 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J.This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. These are: A Facts ....................................................................................................................3 A.1. Transferred cases arising out of the arbitration ................................................. 11 B Submissions of Counsel .................................................................................... 14 C Analysis ..............................................................................................................2 1 C.1. Group of Companies Doctrine......................................................................
Tag this Judgment!