Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-15-2022
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT AND THE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE J.M. KHAZI WRIT PETITION No.2347/2022 (GM-RES) C/w WRIT PETITION No.2146/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.2880/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3038/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3424/2022 (GM-RES-PIL), WRIT PETITION No.4309/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.4338/2022 (GM-RES-PIL) IN W.P. NO.2347 OF2022BETWEEN:1. . SMT RESHAM, D/O K FARUK, AGED ABOUT17YEARS, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND SRI MUBARAK, S/O F FARUK, AGED ABOUT21YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT NO.9-138, PERAMPALI ROAD, SANTHEKATTE, SANTHOSH NAGARA, MANIPAL ROAD, KUNJIBETTU POST, UDUPI, KARNATAKA-576105. PETITIONER (BY PROF. RAVIVARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI ABHISHEK JANARDHAN, SHRI ARNAV. A. BAGALWADI & SHRI SHATHABISH SHIVANNA, ADVOCATES) 2 AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMAR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-15-2022
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT AND THE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE J.M. KHAZI WRIT PETITION No.2347/2022 (GM-RES) C/w WRIT PETITION No.2146/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.2880/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3038/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3424/2022 (GM-RES-PIL), WRIT PETITION No.4309/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.4338/2022 (GM-RES-PIL) IN W.P. NO.2347 OF2022BETWEEN:1. . SMT RESHAM, D/O K FARUK, AGED ABOUT17YEARS, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND SRI MUBARAK, S/O F FARUK, AGED ABOUT21YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT NO.9-138, PERAMPALI ROAD, SANTHEKATTE, SANTHOSH NAGARA, MANIPAL ROAD, KUNJIBETTU POST, UDUPI, KARNATAKA-576105. PETITIONER (BY PROF. RAVIVARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI ABHISHEK JANARDHAN, SHRI ARNAV. A. BAGALWADI & SHRI SHATHABISH SHIVANNA, ADVOCATES) 2 AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMAR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Mar-15-2022
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE15H DAY OF MARCH, 2022 PRESENT THE HONBLE MR. RITU RAJ AWASTHI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNA S. DIXIT AND THE HONBLE MS. JUSTICE J.M. KHAZI WRIT PETITION No.2347/2022 (GM-RES) C/w WRIT PETITION No.2146/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.2880/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3038/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.3424/2022 (GM-RES-PIL), WRIT PETITION No.4309/2022 (GM-RES), WRIT PETITION No.4338/2022 (GM-RES-PIL) IN W.P. NO.2347 OF2022BETWEEN:1. . SMT RESHAM, D/O K FARUK, AGED ABOUT17YEARS, THROUGH NEXT FRIEND SRI MUBARAK, S/O F FARUK, AGED ABOUT21YEARS, BOTH RESIDING AT NO.9-138, PERAMPALI ROAD, SANTHEKATTE, SANTHOSH NAGARA, MANIPAL ROAD, KUNJIBETTU POST, UDUPI, KARNATAKA-576105. PETITIONER (BY PROF. RAVIVARMA KUMAR, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR SHRI ABHISHEK JANARDHAN, SHRI ARNAV. A. BAGALWADI & SHRI SHATHABISH SHIVANNA, ADVOCATES) 2 AND:1. . STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PRIMAR...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-07-2022
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.111113 OF2015RAJESH PRASAD ..APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR. ETC. .RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA J.These appeals have been filed by the appellant informant (PW7 Rajesh Prasad) assailing the judgment and order dated 5th August, 2009 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Patna in Criminal Appeal Nos.714, 747 and 814 of 2008 by which the judgment of conviction dated 26th June, 2008 and order of sentence dated 30th June, 2008 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track CourtV, Munger, has been set aside by allowing the aforesaid appeals and by accordingly answering the Death Reference No.13/2008 and consequently acquitting all the accused. 22. The Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track CourtV, Munger, (hereinafter referred to as the Fast Track Court) vide its judgment dated 26thJune,2008 convicted the respondents herein viz., Upendra ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-01-2022
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No 158 of 2022 (Arising out of SLP (Crl) No 1691 of 2020) Subhash Appellant Versus State of Uttar Pradesh Respondent W I T H Criminal Appeal No 159 of 2022 [Arising out of SLP (Crl) No 876 of 2022 @ SLP (Crl) Diary No 28864 of 2020]. 1 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J A Facts .............................................................................................................. 2 B Submissions ................................................................................................. 5 C Analysis ........................................................................................................ 9 1 Leave granted. A Facts 2 These appeals arise from a judgment of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dated 11 January 2019 in Criminal Appeal No 5307 of 2008. 3 The appeal before the High Court arose from a judgment of the Sessions Judge, Badaun dated 30 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-28-2022
Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.10425 OF2010ESTEEM PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. APPELLANT VERSUS CHETAN KAMBLE & ORS. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.10764 OF2010CORAL GONSALVES & ORS. APPELLANTS VERSUS CHETAN KAMBLE & ORS. RESPONDENTS JUDGMENT N. V. RAMANA, CJI1 The present appeals have been preferred against the judgment dated 07.05.2010 passed by the Bombay High Court in a Public Interest Litigation, being PIL No.47 of 2008.2. The matter pertains to rights and ownership over the subject land admeasuring 5 acres and 20 gunthas in CTS1No.229 (in short subject land). The dispute regarding title was originally between one Gonsalves family (appellants in C.A. No.10764 of 2010) and the State of Maharashtra (respondent no.3). Esteem Properties Pvt. Ltd. (appellant in C.A. No.10425 of 2010) is the successorininterest to the Gonsalves family.3. Before we analyze the case, the facts necessary for the disposal of the case are as follows: From ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-02-2022
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(S).35853586 OF2022(@ SLP(C)No(s). 59895990 of 2022) ARAVINTH R.A. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE & ORS. ...RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT V. Ramasubramanian, J.1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of his two writ petitions praying respectively for, (i) a declaration that Regulations 4(a)(i), 4(a)(ii), 4(b) & 4(c) of the National Medical Commission (Foreign Medical Graduate Licentiate) Regulations 2021, hereinafter referred to as the Licentiate Regulations; and (ii) a declaration that ScheduleII2a) and 2(c)(i) of the National Medical Commission (Compulsory Rotating Medical Internship) Regulations, 2021, (hereinafter referred to as CRMI Regulations) both published on 18.11.2021, are ultra vires and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution, the writ 1 petitioner before the Madras High Court has come up with the above appeals.2. We ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-09-2022
WP3162022 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Writ Petition (Civil) No 316 of 2022 NIMS University Petitioner Versus Union of India and Others Respondents JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1In these proceedings under Article 32 of the Constitution, the petitioners seek directions (a) for the lowering of the cut off percentile for admission to Super Specialty courses; and (ii) to the Medical Counselling Committee (MCC) to conduct a mop up and stray vacancy round of the NEET - Super Specialty counselling to fill up seats which are vacant for the DM/MCh courses. WP3162022 2 2 On 5 April 2018, Gazette Notification No MCI-19(I)/2018-Med./100818 was issued by the then Medical Council of India in the following terms: In order to be eligible for admission to Postgraduate Course for an academic year, it shall be necessary for a candidate to obtain minimum of marks at 50th percentile in the National Eligibility-Cum-Entrance Test for Postgraduate courses he...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-23-2022
Crl.A.847/2022 1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No 847 of 2022 P R Adikesavan Appellant Versus The Registrar General, High Court of Respondents Madras and Another JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J1The appeal arises from the judgment dated 25 March 2022 of a Division Bench of the Madras High Court convicting appellant under Section 2(c)(iii) read with Section 12(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act 1971 and sentencing him two weeks of simple imprisonment. Crl.A.847/2022 2 2 Insolvency proceedings were initiated against the appellant under the provisions of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act 1909. On 12 March 2021, a Single Judge of the Madras High Court issued a non-bailable warrant seeking the presence of the appellant on 26 March 2021. On 31 March 2021, when a team of the police tried to execute the warrant, the appellant and fifty other advocates gheraoed the police and prevented them from executing the order. The Deputy Co...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : May-20-2022
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1301 OF2019RISHIRAJ @ TUTUL MUKHARJEE & ANR. ..Appellants VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ..Respondent WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1302 OF2019HANI @ KOUSTUBH SAMDARIYA ..Appellant VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH ..Respondent AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1303 OF2019VIJAY @ HALLO JAISWAL & ANR. ..Appellants VERSUS STATE OF CHHATTISGARH & ANR. ..Respondents JUDGMENT Uday Umesh Lalit, J.1. These appeals by special leave, at the instance of accused, named; (1) Rishiraj @ Tutul Mukharjee, (2) Samrat @ Laltu Mukharjee, (3) Vijay @ 1 Hallo Jaiswal, (4) Ajay @ Chhotu @ Jijji Jaiswal and (5) Hani @ Koustubh Samadriya, challenge the common judgment and order dated 10.08.2018 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur in Criminal Appeal Nos.452, 492, 522 and 538 of 2012.2. The present proceedings arise out of the registration of crime pursuant to First Information Report No.187 of 2010 dated 09.06.2010, lodge...
Tag this Judgment!