Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-22-2013
..... . according to the accused-appellant, there was an altercation between his brother hari singh (dw5) at the entrance of the residence of kishan singh (pw2) during which a gorkha (a nepali living in india) named rana gave a darat blow to his elder brother hari singh (dw5) which accidentally hit the deceased sardari lal. he further stated, that information about the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-21-2013
M.Y. Eqbal, J.1. Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the division bench of the High Court of Delhi in FAO No. 295 of 2008 affirming the order of the Single Judge and rejecting the petition filed by the appellant under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment as defendants in a suit for specific performance of contract being Suit No. 3426 of 1991 filed by plaintiff-Respondent No.1.3. Although the case has a chequered history, the brief facts of the case can be summarized as under :-4. Mrs. Lakhbir Sawhney, Respondent No. 2 and son Mr. H.S. Sawhney, the predecessor of Respondent No. 3 (a) to (d) were the owners of the property known as “Ojha House” / “Sawhney Mansion”, F-Block, Connaught Place, New Delhi. (These respondents shall be referred as “the Sawhneys” for the sake of convenience). M/s Nanak Builders and Investors Pvt. Ltd., Respondent No.1 is the plaintiff in the Suit. The plaintiff-Respondent No.1 filed a suit in...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Feb-21-2013
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.1518 of 2013 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Civil) No.24159 of 2009) Thomson Press (India) Ltd. ..Appellant (s) Vs. Nanak Builders & Investors P.Ltd. & Ors. ..Respondent(s) JUDGMENT M.Y. EQBAL, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the order passed by the division bench of the High Court of Delhi in FAO No.295 of 2008 affirming the order of the Single Judge and rejecting the petition filed by the appellant under Order 1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment as defendants in a suit for specific performance of contract being Suit No.3426 of 1991 filed by plaintiff-Respondent No.1.3. Although the case has a chequered history, the brief facts of the case can be summarized as under :- 4. Mrs. Lakhbir Sawhney, Respondent No.2 and son Mr. H.S. Sawhney, the predecessor of Respondent No.3 (a) to (d) were the owners of the property known as Ojha House / Sawhney Mansion, F-Block, Connaught Place, New...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-18-2013
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh .....Criminal Appeal not D-729-DB of 2008 ....Date of decision:18.2.2013 Kiranpal ...Appellant v. State of Punjab Respondent ...Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Jasbir Singh Hon'ble Mr.Justice Inderjit Singh ....Present: Mr.Narinder Singh Swaitch, Advocate for the appellant. Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent-State.....Inderjit Singh, J. This appeal has been filed by appellant-Kiranpal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 14.8.2008 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Moga whereby he has been held guilty and convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as `IPC') and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of `20,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year for the offence under Section 302 IPC. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that FIR in the present c...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Appeal No. 1139/2012 Reserved on:17. h January, 2013 Date of Decision:18th February, 2013 % RAJIV @ DIWANJI Through ....Appellant Mr. Mukesh Kalia with Mr. Vikram Singh Saini and Mr. Mohit Popli, Advocates. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Rajiv @ Diwanji, in this appeal, challenges his conviction under Section 302 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). The impugned judgment dated 25th August, 2012, holds that the appellant had committed murder of Dalip Kumar Sajwani on 13th December, 2003, after abducting him. By order of sentence dated 27th August, 2012, for the offence under Section 302 IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of which he has to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days. For the offence under Section 364 IPC, the appella...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-18-2013
Crl. Misc. No.70466 of 2012 in Crl. Appeal not D-150-DB of 2009 -1- Kashmir Singh Versus State of Punjab Present: Mr.S.P.S.Sidhu, for the applicant/appellant. Mr.S.S.Dhaliwal, Addl. AG, Punjab. *** Learned State counsel has filed affidavit of Shri Davinder Kumar Sidhu, PPS, Superintendent, Central Jail, Ferozepur mentioning the period of imprisonment undergone by applicant/appellant-Kashmir Singh. The same is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the parties. The criminal miscellaneous application has been filed seeking suspension of sentence of imprisonment of the applicant/appellant-Kashmir Singh during the pendency of the appeal. The applicant/appellant has been convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Moga for the offence under Section 302 IPC for committing the murder of Kulbir Singh. He has been sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life; besides, pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default thereof to undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year. It is alleged that the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Appeal not D-61-DB of 2006 Date of Decision:January 15, 2013 Chander Chaupal Sharma ...Appellant VERSUS State of Haryana ...Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH 1 To be referred to the Reporters or not?.2. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. Present: Mr.S.S.Tiwana, Advocate Legal Aid Counsel for the appellant. Mr.Pardeep Singh Poonia, Addl. Advocate General, Haryana for the respondent-State. **** INDERJIT SINGH, J.The present appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment/order dated 06.04.2005/11.04.2005, passed by the Sessions Judge, Rohtak, whereby he was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of ` 5,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year, under Section 302 IPC. The brief facts of the prosecution case are that FIR in the present case has been...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Feb-14-2013
Criminal Appeal No.760 DB o1. Criminal Revision No.2744 of 2008 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of decision:14. 2.2013 Criminal Appeal No.760 DB of 2008 Harbans Singh and another ......Appellants Versus State of Punjab .......Respondent Criminal Revision No.2744 of 2008 Hardev Singh ......petitioner Versus State of Punjab and another .......Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Present: Mrs.Baljit K.Mann, Advocate, for the appellants in CRA No.760-DB of 2008 Mr.Ishpuneet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner in CRR No.2744 of 2008. Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Addl.A.G.Punjab. **** JUDGMENT SABINA, J.Vide this judgment, the above mentioned appeal as well as revision petition would be disposed of as these have arisen out of the judgment/ order dated 18.9.2008 passed by the trial Court. Complainant Hardev Singh got recorded his statement before Sub Inspector Onkar Singh on 18.5.2006. The complainant stated that he was residing in villag...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-13-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 02.2013 CEAC 16 2012 WIPRO LIMITED ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Devnath, Mr Aditya Bhattacharya, Mr Abhishek Anand & Mr Bhuvnesh Satijha, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr Satish Kr. Senior Standing Counsel for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J This is an appeal by Wipro Ltd., which was formerly known as Wipro BPO Solutions. It was at the material time engaged in the rendering of IT-enabled services such as technical support services, backoffice services, customer-care services etc. to its various clients all of whom were situated outside India, i.e., in UK, USA and Australia.2. The appeal arises out of the order passed by the Central Excise & Service CEAC 16 2012 Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in order ST/593/2011(PB) on 05.10.2011, in Appeal No. ST/66/2008. On 12....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-12-2013
..... appellant has stated: q30. do you want to say anything else? a. police took me and other workers to ps. owner bindra got released other workers and since i was nepali, he did not get me released. on that day since i was tried, i went to the basement at about 7-8 pm and went to sleep. in the morning .....
Tag this Judgment!