Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Jan-14-2013
REPORTABLE |IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA | |CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION | |CIVIL APPEAL No.124 OF 200.| | | |M/S. BANGALORE CLUB | |APPELLANT | |VERSUS | |COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX & ANR. | |RESPONDENTS | WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.125 OF 2007.CIVIL APPEAL No.272 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16863 of 2010), CIVIL APPEAL NO.273 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16880 of 2010), CIVIL APPEAL NO.274 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16881 of 2010), CIVIL APPEAL NO.275 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16882 of 2010) CIVIL APPEAL NOS.276-277 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) Nos. 16883-16884 of 2010) AND CIVIL APPEAL NO.278 OF 201.(Arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.16879 of 2010) JUDGMENT D.K. JAIN, J.1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petitions.2. This batch of appeals arises from a common judgment and order pronounced by the High Court of Karnataka, in Income Tax Appeals No.115 of 1999 along with 70 of 2000, 3095 of 2005, 1547 of 2005, 1548 of 2005, 3091 of 2...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-11-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM FRIDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 21ST POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 471 of 2013 () ---------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): -------------------------- A.N.NABEEL AGED 1 YEARS S/O.NOORUDHEEN SHAH,AMBALATH HOUSE THALIKKULAM VILLAGE,CHAVAKKAD TALUK THRISSUR DISTRICT (MANAGER M/S. SHAH ADVERTISERS KADAVANTHODE BUILDING,WEST PALACE ROAD NEAR BHIMA GOLD,NORTH BUS STAND,THRISSUR 68 3104) BY ADV. SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS RESPONDENT(S): ---------------------------- 1. CITY POLICE COMMISSIONER OFFICE OF THE POLICE COMMISSIONER,COCHIN CITY ERNAKULAM 68 031.2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALAMASSERY CIRCLE OFFICE,KALAMASSERY P.O ERNAKULAM 68 104.3. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE PALARIVATTOM POLICE STATION,PALARIVATTOM P.O ERNAKULAM DISTRICT025. 4. CHITHRAN, PROPRIETOR,CHITHRA PAINTERS,T.D ROAD COCHIN,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. R1 TO R3 BY GOVT.PLEADER SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER R4 BY AD...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Criminal Appeal not D-711-DB of 2007 Date of decision :10. 01.2013 Prem Kumar ...Appellant VERSUS State of Punjab ...Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE INDERJIT SINGH *** Present : Mr.P.P.S.Duggal, Advocate, for the appellant. Mr.B.S.Bhalla, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab, for the respondent-State. *** INDERJIT SINGH, J The instant appeal is directed against the judgment and order of sentence dated 05.06.2007, passed by the Sessions Judge, Faridkot, vide which appellant Prem Kumar has been held guilty and convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for two yeaRs.Brief facts of the prosecution case are that FIR in the present case was registered on the statement of Laxmi Devi, complainant, widow of deceased Shashi Pal. She ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED:10. 01/2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU Criminal Appeal (MD).No.40 o1. Felix Rajkumar 2.John Victor 3.Santhosh Akaikalaraj 4.Gandhi @ Joseph 5.Henri 6.Amalraj .. Appellants vs. State by the Inspector of Police Kallakudi Police Station, Thiruchirappalli District. .. Respondent Cr.No.54/2002 Criminal appeal is filed under Section 374 of Criminal Procedure Code against the conviction and sentence passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge-cum-Fast Track Court No.1, Thiruchirappalli in S.C.No.45 of 2005, dated 29.11.2005 and prays to set aside the same. !For appellants ... Mr.S.Ashok Kumar Senior Counsel for Mr.AR.Jeya Rhuthran ^For respondent ... Mr.A.Ramar Additional Public Prosecutor :JUDGMENT (Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.NAGAMUTHU, J) Challenge in this appeal is to the conviction and sentence imposed on the appellants. in S.C.No.45 of 2009. on the file ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 30206 of 2011 (A) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ----------------------- PETER, S/O.JOSEPH, PUNCHAPUTHUSSERIL, KIZHAKKAMBALAM VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.R.KRISHNAKUMAR (CHERTHALA) SMT.TINY THOMAS RESPONDENT(S): ------------------------- 1. VILLAGE OFFICER, MULANTHURUTHY VILLAGE,MULANTHURUTHY P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 314.2. TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KANAYANNUR,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 011.3. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD ERNAKULAM-682021.4. SUB REGISTRAR, MULANTHURUTHY, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT-682 314.5. THE DIRECTOR (VIGILANCE), P.M.G., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.6. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (VIGILANCE), ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, ERNAKULAM-682 011.7. VARGHESE, S/O. OUSEPH, CHAKYATHU HOUSE, MUKKANNOOR P.O., ALUVA TALUK PIN-683 577.8. SALINI, D/O.VARGHES...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.T.SANKARAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 CRL.A.No. 2659 of 2008 (B) -------------------------- SESSIONS CASE NO.296/01 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE - I, MAVELIKKARA. APPELLANT : ---------------- ANIL KUMAR, C.NO.3131, CENTRAL PRISON, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. BY ADVS.SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR SRI.K.JAGADEESH RESPONDENT: -------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM. PUBLIC PROSECUTORSRI.P.R.RANJITH. THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 10-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: K.T.SANKARAN & M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.----------------------------------------------- Crl. Appeal No.2659 of 2008 ----------------------------------------------- Dated 10th January, 2013. JUDGMENT K.T.Sankaran, J.The first accused in Sessions Case No.296 of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 MACA.No. 988 of 2012 (E) ----------------------- AGAINST THE AWARD DTD. 10.1.2012 IN OPMV.9/2009 OF M.A.C.T, OTTAPALAM. APPELLANT/1ST RESPONDENT: ---------------------------------- LAKSHMANAN, AGED 5 YEARS, S/O.RAMAN, ERAVATHODI THERUVU, P.O. KANIYARCODE, THRISSUR DISTRICT. (DRIVER-CUM-OWNER OF KED-5040 JEEP) BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER & RESPONDENTS 2 3 & 4: ------------------------------------------------------------- 1. JOMINA, AGED 4 YEARS, W/O.EBENEZAR NOBLE DAVID, PALATHARA HOUSE, THIRUVILWAMALA P.O., THRISSUR DISTRICT.2. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD., OTTAPALAM BRANCH, P.O. OTTAPALAM - 690001, PALAKKAD DISTRICT (INSURER OF KED-5040 JEEP) POLICY NO.101203/31/07/02/0004031 POLICY VALID FROM 22 8.2007 TO 21.8.2008.3. SHAMEEJA, AGE NOT KNOWN, D/O.MOIDEENKUTTY, VADAKKEKALAM HOUSE, P.O. THIRUVILWAMALA, THRISSUR DIS...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Kerala
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC THURSDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013 20TH POUSHA 193 WP(C).No. 7988 of 2011 (W) -------------------------- PETITIONER(S): ------------- JOSE JOSEPH, AGED 5 YEARS, S/O.JOSEPH, MANAPPATT HOUSE, PARATHODU P.O., PODIMATTOM, KANJIRAPPALLY. BY ADV. SRI.NOBLE MATHEW RESPONDENT(S): -------------- 1. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY OFFICER, KANJIRAPPALLY-686 507.2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KOTTAYAM-686 001.3. THE MANAGER, CANARA BANK, KANJIRAPPALLY BRANCH-686507. BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SHOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN BY SRI.PAULY MATHEW MURICKEN,SC,CANARA BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: DSV/- WP(C).No. 7988 of 2011 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS: P1 COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.1 ON 14.07.2009 DEMANDING THE PAYMENT OF RS.13,22,291- TO THE PETITIONER. P2 COPY OF THE DEMAND NOTICE UNDER SECTION ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
CRA No.691-SB of 2001 (O&M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRA No.691-SB of 2001 (O&M) Date of Decision :10. 01.2013 Satbir Singh & others ... Appellants versus State of Haryana ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARI Present : Mr. Baldev Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Deepinder Singh, Advocate for the appellants. Ms. Preeti Chaudhary, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Harish Bhardwaj, Advocate for the complainant. **** AJAY TEWARI, J.This appeal has been filed against the conviction of the appellants in FIR No.123 dated 18.05.1997 under Section 307, 326, 324, 323 and 34 IPC registered at Police Station Pilukhera District, Jind. The allegations are that the four appellants, who are the brothers attacked at the injured persons because of established previous enemity on 17.05.1997 at about 7.30 am when the complainant was going to his fields. As per the prosecution, appellant No.1 inflicted two injuries on the injured with a gandasa, one on his head and one on the ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Jan-10-2013
CRR No.3998 of 2012 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA, CHANDIGARH CRR No.3998 of 2012 (O&M) Date of Decision:10. 1.2013 Suresh Chander Aggarwal ..........Petitioner Versus State of Punjab ..........Respondent Coram: Hon'ble MRS.Justice Sabina Present: Mr.Balram Singh, Advocate for the petitioner....Sabina, J. Petitioner had faced trial in FIR No.63 dated 2.5.1999 under Sections 420,120-B of the Indian Penal Code,1860 (for short `IPC') along with other co-accused. Vide judgment/order dated 9.12.2010, Suresh Chander Aggarwal (petitioner).Jiwan Kumar Anand and Varinder Kochar were convicted and sentenced qua the commission of offence punishable under Section 420 IPC. The other co-accused of the petitioner, namely, Hem Lata, Poonam Prabhkar and Pardeep Kalia were acquitted of the charges framed against them. Aggrieved against the order of his conviction and sentence, petitioner preferred an appeal. The appellate Court, vide judgment dated 15.11.2011, dismissed the appeal filed ...
Tag this Judgment!