Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Mar-25-2013
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH:HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE VIMLA JAIN CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2929/2000 Ramswaroop Aged 37 years S/o Durga Prasad Luhar Occupation Driver R/o Village Tohiyapura Kulpahad Hall Teharka District Tikamgarh (MP) Appellant Versus State of Madhya Pradesh Through Police Station Teharka District Tikamgarh (MP) Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Smt Durgesh Gupta, Advocate for the appellant. Shri Amit Pandey, Panel Lawyer for the State. Date of hearing :19. 3.2013 Date of judgment:25. 3.2013 (JUDGMENT ) Per: Vimla Jain, J Appellant Ramswaroop Luhar preferred this appeal under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved by the judgment dated 18.10.2000 passed by 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Tikamgarh in Sessions Trial No.66/99, 2 whereby he has been convicted and sentenced as under:- Provision Sentence Under Section 302 of IPC...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:15. 02.2013 Judgment pronounced on :22. .03.2013 CRL.A.1348/2012 RADHEY SHYAM Through: .. Appellant Mr. G.K. Srivastava, Advocate Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: .. Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The appellant Radhey Shyam, along with Raghu Raj and Giri Raj was sent up for trial under Sections 302/323/324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) for committing the murder of Hari Prasad @ Babu, the deceased.2. Vide judgement dated 17.07.2012, the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi convicted the appellant Radhey Shyam for offences under Section 302/324 IPC for stabbing the deceased with a knife and thereby committing murder. By virtue of order on sentence dated 31.07.2012, the appellant was to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of `10,000/-was impose...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-22-2013
Crl. Appeal No.988-SBA of 2000 -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh Date of Decision: March 22, 2013 Crl. Appeal No.988-SBA of 2000 State of Punjab ---Appellant versus Krishaan Dutt and others ---Respondents Crl. Revision No.206 of 2000 Housefed, Punjab ---Petitioner versus Retd. Col.Puran Singh and others ---Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal Present: Mrs. Vandana Malhotra, Addl. Advocate General, Punjab for State of Punjab Mr. R.S.Sihota, Senior Advocate, with Mr. Ashok Kumar Sharma, Advocate, for the respondents (In CRA No.988-SB of 2000) Mr. Ravinder Singh, Advocate for Mr. S.S.Narula, Advocate, for the complainant-Housefed, Punjab *** REKHA MITTAL, J.By way of this order I shall dispose of CRA No.988-SB of 2000 (State of Punjab vs. Krishaan Dutt and others) and Crl. Revision No.206 of 2000 (Housefed, Punjab vs. Retd. Col. Puran Singh and others) as Crl. Appeal No.988-SBA of 2000 -2- they have arisen out of the common judgment dated 5.8.1999 p...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-21-2013
..... shakeel (a-59) would meet him there, who would then unload the vehicle. as per the instructions of shakeel, the appellant (a-28) had proceeded to park the vehicle. a nepali had then come there, and some persons had unloaded the goods from the vehicle and had then brought the said vehicle back to the delhi darbar hotel, after which, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Decided on : Mar-21-2013
APPEALS RELATING TO LIFE SENTENCE PART-2 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1178 of 2007 Essa @ Anjum Abdul Razak Memon (A-3) Appellant(s) vs. The State of Maharashtra, through STF, CBI Mumbai ...Respondent(s) WITH Criminal Appeal No.1179 of 2007 AND Criminal Appeal No.419 of 2011 WITH Criminal Appeal No.1181 of 2007 WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 1127-1128 of 2007 WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 1252-1253 of 2007 AND Criminal Appeal No.413 of 2011 WITH Criminal Appeal No.1365 of 2007 WITH Criminal Appeal No.1224 of 2007 WITH Criminal Appeal No.1440 of 2007 AND Criminal Appeal No.1028 of 2012 WITH Criminal Appeal No.1441 of 2007 WITH Criminal Appeal No.401 of 2008 AND Criminal Appeal No.1023 of 2012 WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 976-977 of 2008 WITH Criminal Appeal No.616 of 2008 WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 979-980 of 2008 WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 633 of 2008 WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 651-652 of 2008 WITH Criminal Appeal Nos. 653 AND 65.of 2008 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-20-2013
1. This Notice of Motion is taken out by the Plaintiff for directions in the suit relating to the admissibility of the documents of the Plaintiff, the cross examination of the Plaintiff's witnesses and for expeditious progress of the hearing of the above suit and the suits filed by the defendants herein being Admiralty Suit Nos.32 of 2011, 26 of 2011, 53 of 2011 and 54 of 2011. 2. It may be at once be mentioned that in view of the amendment of the Civil Procedure Code in 1999 and 2002 (CPC) more specially by the amendment to Order 8 Rule 1 and Order 18 Rule 4 of the CPC, all suits are in essence expedited. 3. So soon as writ of summons is served or is even deemed to be served and the defendants are represented in the suit, the Written Statement would have to be filed within 30 days, except when the Court, for specified reasons, allows the defendant to file the suit within a extended period of 90 days under Order 8 Rule 1 of CPC. 4. After the Written Statement is filed it is for the cou...
Tag this Judgment!Court : US Supreme Court
Decided on : Mar-19-2013
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. NOTE:Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus KIRTSAENG, dba BLUECHRISTINE99 v. JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the second circuit No. 11697.Argued October 29, 2012Decided March 19, 2013 The exclusive rights that a copyright owner has to distribute copies ... of [a] copyrighted work, 17 U.S.C. 106(3), are qualified by the application of several limitations set out in 107 through 122, including the first sale doctrine, which provides that the owner of a particular copy or phonorecord lawfully made under this title ... is entitled, with...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-15-2013
CRM not M-7820 o1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM not M-7820 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision:15.03.2013 Deepak Dhokal and another .....Petitioners Versus State of Haryana .....Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR. Present: Mr.S.K.Tripathi, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** MEHINDER SINGH SULLAR , J.(oral) The earlier petition for regular bail bearing CRM not M- 37391 of 2012 filed by the petitioners, was dismissed as withdrawn by this Court, by way of order dated November 27, 2012.2. Petitioners-Deepak Dhokal son of Kashi Ram and Padam Bhandari @ Tara Bhandari son of Dhawale, have directed the instant 2nd petition for the grant of regular bail in a case registered against them along with their other co-accused, by means of FIR No.329 dated 22.06.2012, for the commission of offences punishable under Sections 328 and 381 IPC, by the police of Police Station Civil Lines, Gurgaon, invoking the provisions of Section 439 Cr.P.C.3. Concisely, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-14-2013
LPA No.521 of 2013 (O&M) -1- In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh LPA No.521 of 2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: March 14, 2013 Nepal Singh ---Appellant versus State of Haryana and others ---Respondents Coram: Hon'ble Mr.Justice Rajive Bhalla Hon'ble MRS.Justice Rekha Mittal Present: Mr.R.S.Chauhan, Advocate for the appellant *** RAJIVE BHALLA, J.(ORAL) The appellant prays for setting aside order dated 30.1.2013 allowing the writ petition filed by Parkash Chand, thereby appointing him as the Lambardar. Counsel for the appellant submits that as the Commissioner, Gurgaon Division, Gurgaon and the Financial Commissioner, Haryana, appointed the appellant as the Lambardar, mere pendency of an FIR, in which the appellant has been later acquitted, is not sufficient to set aside the appellant's selection. It is further submitted that perusal of the judgment, recorded by the criminal Court, reveals that the appellant was LPA No.521 of 2013 (O&M) -2- acquitted for failure of prosecu...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Punjab and Haryana
Decided on : Mar-14-2013
Civil Writ Petition No.19508 of 2008 (O&M) :1: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH DATE OF DECISION: MARCH 14 2013 Miss Kalyani .....Petitioner VERSUS Union of India & another ....Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RANJIT SINGH 1 Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the judgement?.2. To be referred to the Reporters or not?.3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?. PRESENT: Mr.Anupam Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr.K.S.Sandhu, Advocate, for the petitioner as Amicus Curiae. Ms.Sangita Dhanda, Advocate, Standing counsel for Union of India. Prof.Arvind, Prof. & Dean, IISER, Mohali, MGSIPAP Complex, Sector-26, Chandigarh. **** RANJIT SINGH, J. A young Miss Kalyani, a Brilliant Student, who was awarded a Gold Medal in International Biology Olympiads, 2007 where she represented India, has been forced to approach the Court for grant of her rightful Fellowship under Kishore Vaigyanik Protsahan Yojana. Her brilliance is reflected from the...
Tag this Judgment!