Court : Uttaranchal
Decided on : Apr-30-2013
U.C. Dhyani, J. 1) Victim Km. Parwati Kapkoti lodged a complaint to Patti Patwari, Lamgarha, District-Almora complaining that the accused Ramesh Ram attempted to commit rape with her. 2) According to the complaint, the victim, on 17.08.2005, went to pasture her goats in the forest of Dabri. At about 2.00 p.m., co-villager Ramesh Ram s/o Ratan Ram came from behind the victim, snatched her dupatta, caught hold of her hands, pressed her breasts and uttered indecent language. She tried to release herself, but the accused caught hold of her, opened her trouser, caught her by her waist and tore her trouser. She raised an alarm. Chandan Singh, who was present in the forest, after hearing the voice of Parwati came there but Ramesh Ram fled away using abusive language. Accused also said that he would kill him the victim, if she disclosed the incident to anybody. Leela Devi, who also had came to the forest, saw the incident. On the basis of such complaint a chik F.I.R. was lodged (Ex.Ka-4) on th...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-29-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 29 4.2013 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.31618 of 2005 and W.P.M.P.No.34662 of 2005 S.M.Karthikeyan .. Petitioner Vs. 1.Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Rep.by its Chairman-cum-Managing Director Neyveli-1 2.The Additional Chief Manager/Disciplinary Authority Lignite Sales/Mine I-A Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Administrative Office, Block-26, Neyvel3. The Chief General Manager/MineI&IA/ Appellate Authority Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd., Administrative Office, Block-26, Neyvel4. The General Manager/TA Township Administrative Office Block-10, Neyvel5. The Deputy General Manager/Vigilance Office of the Vigilance Officer Block 8, Neyveli 1 .. Respondents Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order in Procs.No.1222/Mine-IA/P&A/DA/2004 dated 21.12.2004 passed by the 2nd respondent and confirmed by t...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on : Apr-26-2013
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT JAMMU. Cr Appeal No. 10 OF 199.AND CrMA No. 218 OF 199.AND CrMA NO. 24 OF 199.1. Anil Singh 2. State of J&K. Petitioners 1. State of J&K. 2.Anil Singh Respondent !Mr. Sunil Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Waheed Choudhary, Advocate ^Mr. Gagan Basotra, Sr. AAG Mr. L. K. Sharma, Advocate Honble Mr. Justice Virender Singh, Judge Honble Mr. Justice Bansi Lal Bhat, Judge Date:26. 04.2013 :JUDGMENT : Cr. Appeal No. 10/1994 & CrMA Nos. 218/1995 & 24/1999 C/w Confirm No. 35/1994 Per Bansi Lal Bhat- Per Bansi Lal Bhat---J 1.This appeal has been preferred against judgment dated 23.07.1994 formulated by learned Sessions Judge Jammu in File No. 62/Sessions titled State v Anil Singh by virtue whereof appellant Anil Singh (hereinafter referred to as accused) was convicted of offence u/s 302 R.P.C. and sentenced to life imprisonment plus fine of Rs. 1000/- (Rupees One Thousand) with three months simple imprisonment proposed in default of 2 payment of fi...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:10. 04.2013 Judgment pronounced on:26. 04.2013 CRL.A. 1470/2011 VINOD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13.07.2011 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) for committing the murder of deceased Sanjay on 30.07.2007 by inflicting multiple stabs injuries. By order of sentence dated 15.07.2011, the appellant is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of `2000/- has also been imposed. In default of payment of fine, the appellant is to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one month.2. We note that co-accused Kushal was declared juvenile by the Sessions Court vide order dated 0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1317/2012 Reserved on :17. h April, 2013 Date of Decision:26. h April, 2013 % RAM LAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH SANJIV KHANNA, J:1. The appellant Ram Lal impugns his conviction vide judgment dated 15th October, 2009. under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of Kalam on 6th September, 2006 at about 9.30-10.00 p.m. He has been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/-, which, upon realization, is to be equally distributed amongst the family members of the deceased.2. There is ample evidence to show that Kalam died a homicidal death pursuant to injuries suffered by a sharp edged weapon. Dr. Sapna (PW-3), who was working as a Junior Resident at Safdarjung Hospital, had examined Kalam and had prepared his MLC (Ex.PW3...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-25-2013
1 Cr.A. No.828 of 2000 Cr.A. No.956 of 2000 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.828 of 2000 APPELLANT: Kallu @ Devendra S/o Ramraj, Aged- about 19 years, Caste Kori, R/o- H.No.27, Near the house of Hukumchand Prajapati, Chandwar, Thana Station Bajaria, Bhopal Versus RESPONDENT: The State of Madhya Pradesh and CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.956 of 2000 APPELLANT: Durga Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged- about 20 years, Caste Chouhan, R/o- H.No.7, Near Cloth Mill Gate, Near the house of Hukumchand Prajapati, Thana Station Bajaria, Bhopal Versus RESPONDENT: The State of Madhya Pradesh Through Police Station Govindpura, Bhopal --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Appellants : Shri Ghanshyam Pandey, Learned Counsel For the Respondent/State: Shri Amit Pandey, Learned Penal Lawyer -----------------------------------------------------------...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
Decided on : Apr-25-2013
1 Cr.A. No.828 of 2000 Cr.A. No.956 of 2000 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR DIVISION BENCH: HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HONBLE SHRI JUSTICE SUBHASH KAKADE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.828 of 2000 APPELLANT: Kallu @ Devendra S/o Ramraj, Aged- about 19 years, Caste Kori, R/o- H.No.27, Near the house of Hukumchand Prajapati, Chandwar, Thana Station Bajaria, Bhopal Versus RESPONDENT: The State of Madhya Pradesh and CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.956 of 2000 APPELLANT: Durga Singh S/o Devi Singh, Aged- about 20 years, Caste Chouhan, R/o- H.No.7, Near Cloth Mill Gate, Near the house of Hukumchand Prajapati, Thana Station Bajaria, Bhopal Versus RESPONDENT: The State of Madhya Pradesh Through Police Station Govindpura, Bhopal --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the Appellants : Shri Ghanshyam Pandey, Learned Counsel For the Respondent/State: Shri Amit Pandey, Learned Penal Lawyer -----------------------------------------------------------...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-24-2013
Oral Judgment: (Dr. D.Y. Chandrachud, J.) Rule, by consent made returnable forthwith. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondents waives service on behalf of the Respondents. By consent, the Petitions are taken up for hearing and final disposal. 2. In both the Petitions which form the subject matter of the proceedings, the Petitioner has questioned the legality and validity of an order passed by the Joint Secretary to the Government of India on 24 May 2012 dismissing the revision applications filed by the Petitioner from orders of the appellate authority confirming the rejection of rebate claims. 3. The Petitioner engages in the manufacture of Polyethylene Insulated Jelly filled Copper Cables and Optical Fiber Cables used in telecommunication falling under tariff heading 85.44 of the Central Excise Tariff. The Petitioner has a factory at Silvassa which is registered under the Central Excise Rules with the Central Excise Division- III, Silvassa falling under the Vapi Comm...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-23-2013
..... on hearing her noise, her uncle woke up and raised alarm. the neighbours apprehended the accused at the spot. she elaborated that the accused was apprehended by her uncle, one nepali, her brother-in-law and his wife. however, he succeeded to flee the spot. the prosecution did not examine any such relative or neighbour to lend credence to the prosecutrixs .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Chennai
Decided on : Apr-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated :22-04-2013 Coram : THE HONOURABLE SELVI JUSTICE K.SUGUNA THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY Writ Petition No.26905 of 2011 M/s.Salem Textiles Limited, Having its Registered Office at Selliampalayam, Attu108. Salem District Represented by its Managing Director. .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Authorized Officer, M/s.Phoenix ARC Private Ltd., Acting as Trustee on behalf of Phoenix Trust FY 09-7, 7th Floor, Dani Corporate Park, 158 CST Road, Kalina Santacruz (E), Mumba098. 2.Industrial Development Bank of India Ltd., Represented by its Chairman and Managing Director, IDBI Towers, Cuffee Parade, Mumbai. 3.Salem Textiles, National Textile Workers Union, Registration No.253/SLM, Affiliated to INTUC, Selliampalayam, Narasinghapuram (PO), Salem District. 4.Salem Mavatta Dravida Panchalai Thozhilalar Munnetra Sangam, Affiliated to LPF, Registration No.370/Salem, Selliampalayam, Narasinghapuram (PO), Sa...
Tag this Judgment!