Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: nepali Sorted by: recent Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 352 results (0.004 seconds)

Nov 28 2002 (HC)

Radha and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-28-2002

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC455

..... are not necessarily women of bad character but have been driven to the profession due to acute poverty in their family. it was reported in the press that 1,200 nepali girls are sold every year by their parents and brought to brothels in calcutta and elsewhere because the parents cannot feed those girls. similar is the plight in various parts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2002 (HC)

Gopal Lal Vs. Additional District and Sessions Judge and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-23-2002

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2787

..... landlord-respondent no. 2, sharad chandra mishra filed a suit bearingsuit no, 156 of 1994 for ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from house no. ck-32/1, 2, 3, mohalla nepali khapra, varanasi, which is a non-residential accommodation in which one late smt. gangajali was the tenant. originally it was let out to kedar nath, who was tenant and after .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2002 (HC)

Raju Gurung Vs. the State (U.T. Chandigarh)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-20-2002

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3426

..... often used to come to section 18-a, chandigarh. thus witness knew the accused previously. no doubt, both suresh kumar and sewak ram had stated that they could identify the nepali boy if he comes across them. while stating the version as has come in the statement of sitla parshad they had not specifically named the petitioner-accused. admittedly, during the ..... been falsely named in this case on suspicion for the crime mainly on the ground that he was one of the nepali boys who were playing volley ball in the ground near veerka dairy in sector 18-a, chandigarh where other nepali boys were also playing with him. though prosecution had cited three eye-witnesses, namely, sitla parshad, suresh kumar and ram .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2002 (HC)

Smt. Sushila Singh and ors. Vs. Driver Madhulal Rai and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Jan-18-2002

Reported in : 2002(2)MPHT7(CG)

..... -2001, passed by a.d.j., durg, whereby application for withdrawal of f.d.r. amount has been rejected.3. counsel for the applicants submits that the deceased was a nepali and he died in an accident and the claimants are widow and children. he further submits that the amount is needed for treatment of the child of the deceased, who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2002 (HC)

Raj Bahadur @ Raju Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2002

Reported in : 98(2002)DLT3; 2002(82)ECC791

..... as follows:'on 10.2.95 at about 3.40 p.m. si tarkeshwar singh was on patrolling duty in main bazar, paharganj. he received a secret information that one nepali often comes to diamond cafe to sell charas and at that time also he was standing outside the diamond cafe waiting for some customer and that he is in possession .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 27 2002 (TRI)

Society for Integrated Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Dec-27-2002

Reported in : (2004)90ITD493(Hyd.)

..... , signed by mr. vardhan, it was stated that mr. vardhan met the representative of charity international, nepal, an n.g.o. which was contemplating starting a medical college to help nepalies and that during the discussion it was decided that sidur would come forward to render financial aid to facilitate setting up of the college and repayment would be made once ..... the college was established. that in this context he gave rs. 32 lakhs to k.m.c. this explanation is indeed specious. helping set-up a medical college for nepalies is hardly a charitable purpose which was further not put across to the executive committee of sidur. in his deposition mr. vardhan admitted that it was not as if sidur .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2002 (TRI)

Jai Prakash Saini Vs. Director, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Rese ...

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on : Dec-23-2002

Lokeshwar Prasad, President: 1. The complainant, Shri Jai Prakash Saini, has filed the present complaint under Section 17 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), averring therein that the complainant, an ex-serviceman, re-employed with the Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi as a Clerk-cum-Coin Note Examiner, in August, 1997 suffered stomach ailment, consulted the Medical Officer of the Reserve Bank of India, New Delhi, for treatment, who, after examining the complainant, gave treatment which provided only temporary relief to the complainant and gradually two glands on the neck and one gland on the left side of the face of the complainant appeared. The Medical Officer of the Reserve Bank of India, under whose treatment the complainant was, after a few days of medication advised the complainant to consult some surgical specialist. On the advice of the Medical Officer of the Reserve Bank of India, the complainant approached the doctor at the Armed Forces C...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 20 2002 (SC)

Jinia KeotIn and ors. Vs. Kumar Sitaram Manjhi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Dec-20-2002

Reported in : 2003(3)AWC2288(SC); 2003(51)BLJR682; (SCSuppl)2003(2)CHN116; I(2003)DMC1SC; JT2002(10)SC571; 2003(1)KLT348(SC); (2003)1SCC730; [2002]SUPP5SCR689; 2003(1)LC215(SC)

D. Raju, J.1. The plaintiff (1st respondent herein) filed the suit claiming for 1/6th share in Schedules A to D properties and 1/3rd share in Schedule E properties. From the indisputable facts on record, the ancestral properties have to be divided firstly between Sahadeo Manjhi, his brother Mahadeo Manjhi (defendants Nos. 1 & 2) and their mother Dukhani Keotain (defendant No.7) each one getting 1/3rd share. Out of the 1/3rd share of Sahadeo Manjhi, the properties again will be equally divided in four parts each one of the sharers getting 1/4th share. Defendants 8 to 11 are said to be not entitled to any share on account of the fact that the marriage of the 1st defendant with the 8th defendant was void for the reason that his first wife, Smt. Kamli Devi, was alive and the first marriage still subsisting. The second marriage - remarriage, of 1st defendant with the 8th defendant after the coming into force of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 cannot be valid. The learned 2nd Additional Subordi...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2002 (HC)

Hegedus Lahel Csaba Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-19-2002

Reported in : 102(2003)DLT868; 2003(66)DRJ569; 2003(87)ECC105

R.C. Chopra, J. 1. This application for suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal has been moved on behalf of the appellant who stands convicted under Section 20(B)(ii) and Section 23 read with Section 28 of the NDPS Act (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act' only). The appellant was sentenced by the Trial Court to undergo RI for 10 years and pay a fine of Rs. 1 lakh, in default of which he was ordered to undergo further RI for six months.2. The appellant who is a foreign national was a transit passenger from Nepal to Amsterdam. On the intervening night of 26th and 27th June, 1997, he was searched at IGI Airport New Delhi and was found to be in possession of 13.476 kgs. Charas. The appellant was put to trial. Learned Trial Judge after considering the prosecution evidence and the defense of the appellant convicted and sentenced him as aforesaid. His appeal against conviction and sentence is pending disposal before this Court.3. I have heard learned counsel for the appellan...

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2002 (HC)

Ram NaraIn Singh (In Jail) Vs. State

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-19-2002

Reported in : 2003CriLJ3160

Y.R. Tripathi, J.1. This criminal appeal is directed against the conviction and sentence recorded by Sri Usha Kant Verma, the then IIIrd Addl. Sessions Judge, Kanpur in S.T. No. 8 of 1980 State v. Ram Narain Singh, whereby he having convicted the appellant-Ram Narain Singh S/o Ayodha Singh r/o village Fattepur Gohi P.S. Bidhuna District Kanpur of the charge under Section 302. I.P.C. has sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life.2. The appellant and the deceased are residents of village Fattepur Gohi, which lies within police station Bidhuna District Kanpur at a distance of 8 miles to the northwest of the Police Station, To the south of the house of the deceased there is 2-2 1/2 paces wide path way running from east to west. To the south-west of the house 'of the deceased after the said path way existed the house of one Toothi Chamar. The house of Toothi Chamar opened in his sahan to the west. There existed two cattle troughs adjacent to the south of the path way lying to the south...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //