Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: nepali Sorted by: recent Year: 2002 Page 6 of about 352 results (0.023 seconds)

Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Kapila Paikray

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 95(2003)CLT186

B.P. Das, J.1. This is an appeal under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (in short 'the Act') by the Land Acquisition Officer, Puri, challenging the award dated 28.2.1997 passed in L. A. Misc. Case No. 315 of 1994 by which the Civil Judge (Sr. Divn.), Bhubaneswar granted compensation for the acquired land of the respondent-land oustee at a rate of Rs. 4,00,000/- per acre along with other statutory benefits, such as, 12% additional compensation under Section 23, 30% solatium under Section 23(2) and interest at the rate of 9% per annum for the first year and 15% per annum for the subsequent years, till actual payment is made, as provided under Section 28 of the Act.2. Consequent upon publication of the notification under Section 4(i) of the Act in the Orissa Gazette on 11.1.1984 the State Government acquired several plots of land indicated therein including plot No. 125 under Khata No. 2 with an area of Ac. 0.501 in Mouza Bharatpur under Bhubaneswar P.S. in Puri district belon...

Eldred Vs. Ashcroft

Court : US Supreme Court

Eldred v. Ashcroft - 537 U.S. 186 (2002) OCTOBER TERM, 2002 Syllabus ELDRED ET AL. v. ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT No. 01-618. Argued October 9, 2002-Decided January 15,2003 The Copyright and Patent Clause, U. S. Const., Art. I, 8, cl. 8, provides as to copyrights: "Congress shall have Power ... [t]o promote the Progress of Science ... by securing [to Authors] for limited Times ... the exclusive Right to their ... Writings." In the 1998 Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA), Congress enlarged the duration of copyrights by 20 years: Under the 1976 Copyright Act (1976 Act), copyright protection generally lasted from a work's creation until 50 years after the author's death; under the CTEA, most copyrights now run from creation until 70 years after the author's death, 17 U. S. C. 302(a). As in the case of prior copyright extensions, principally in 1831, 1909, and 1976, Congress provided for applic...

Sushil Kr. More Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in : (2003)(87)ECC21

1. The issue involved in the present appeal is as to whether the Special Additional Duty (SAD) is applicable in respect of imports made from Nepal prior to issuance of Notification No. 124/2000-Cus., dated 29-9-2000 vide which the earlier Notification No. 37/96-Cus. was amended.2. While deciding the case the adjudicating authority has observed that :- Notification No. .18/2000 providing for exemption from SAD on imported goods is categorical in this respect, its serial No. 31 and 32 provide for exemption from levy of SAD on : "All goods which are exempt from - (a) the whole of the duly of customs leviable thereon under the First Schedule; and (b) the whole of the additional duty of customs duty leviable thereon under Sub-section (1) of Section (3) of the Customs Tariff Act". "All goods (a) in case of which Free rates of duty of customs are specified in column (4) or column (5), as the case may be, of the First Schedule, and (b) which are exempt from the whole of the additional duty of...

Paras Nath and ors. Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1310

R.C. Deepak, J.1. This is a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of the then VIth Additional District and Sessions Judge, Allahabad dated 24-1-1981 in S.T. No. 74 of 1980 convicting and sentencing the accused appellants under Section 302/34, I.P.C. to life imprisonment.2. The prosecution case briefly stated is that on 8-11-1979 at about 7.30 p.m. the informant Ram Badan's brother Ram Chandar deceased was sitting on a Takhat in front of the door of his house. At that time the accused appellant Sukru happened to come to him and started talking to him. In the course of their talks, they scuffled with each other. In the mean time, Munni Lal Premi Son of Kanhai Lal, Prabhu Nath Son of Vishram, Ram Narain alias Narain, brother-in-law of Munni Lal Premi, Paras Nath Son of Titir, Jamuna Son of Kakhnu, Ganga Ram Son of Khakhnu, Babu Lal Son of Ram Autar and Sant Lal Son of Ram Autar with the common object of killing Ram Chander pounced upon him while inciting, exciting and provoking o...

Pahelwan Singh and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1102

M.C. Jain, J.1. Four appellants in this appeal are (1) Pahalwan Singh (2) Shiv Pal Singh (3) Cyan Singh and (4) Mahendra Singh alias Middi Singh. who have preferred this appeal against the judgment and order dated 31-1-1981 passed by Sri L.S.P. Singh, I Additional Judge, Kanpur in Sessions Trial No. 264 of 1979. All of them have been convicted under Section 302, I.P.C. read with Section 34, I.P.C. and sentenced to life imprisonment.2. A brief resume of the facts is necessary. The appellants Shiv Pal Singh and Gyan Singh are real brothers and they are first cousins of the appellant Pahalwan Singh. The fourth appellant Mahendra Singh alias Middi Singh was an eyewitness in the case of the murder of Ram Prasad, father of the appellant Pahalwan Singh. The deceased of the present incident was Jai Ram whose son PW 2 Ram Autar -- informant is. For the murder of Ram Prasad (father of the appellant Pahalawan Singh); the deceased Jai Ram, his son informant -- PW 2 Ram Autar, nephew Shambhu and tw...

Bharatbhai @ Jimi Premchandbhai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2002SC3620; 2003(1)ALT(Cri)280; 2003CriLJ28; (2003)1GLR330; (2003)1GLR330; JT2002(7)SC529; 2002(7)SCALE201; (2002)8SCC447; [2002]SUPP3SCR46; 2002(2)LC1454(SC)

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1. Deceased Raghunath Yadav was convicted and sentenced by the Sessions Court at Varanasi for the murder of father of Brijesh Singh-who is one of the absconding accused in the present case. While on bail in appeal, Raghunath Yadav, apprehending danger to his life, came to reside at Mehsana in the State of Gujarat. On 14th June, 1992, Reghunath Yadav was murdered at Mehsana.2. In TADA case Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7 of 1990, twelve accused were triedby the Designated Judge, Ahmedabad for offences under Section 302,397, 120B, IPC Section 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) and 5 of the Terrorist AndDisruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short 'TADA Act') andunder Section 25(1)(a) and (b) of the Arms Act.3. The charge-sheet against accused Nos. 1 to 3 was filed on 6th April,1993, against accused Nos. 4 to 6 on 1st July, 1994 against accused Nos.7 to 11 on 15th April, 1996 and against accused No. 12 on 26th November,1996. The charges were that the accused persons and abscondingaccused - ...

Bharatbhai @ Jimi Premchandbhai Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : (2003)1GLR330

Y.K. Sabharwal, J.1. Deceased Raghunath Yadav was convicted and sentenced by the Sessions Court at Varanasi for the murder of father of Brijeshsinh - who is one of the absconding accused in the present case. While on bail in appeal, Raghunath Yadav, apprehending danger to his life, came to reside at Mehsana in the State of Gujarat. On 14th June, 1992, Raghunath Yadav was murdered at Mehsana.2. In TADA Case Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 7 of 1996, twelve accused were tried by the Designated Judge, Ahmedabad for offences under Sections 302, 397, 307 and 120B I.P.C. Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) and 5 of the Terrorist And Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (for short 'TADA Act') and under Section 25(1)(a) and (b) of the Arms Act.3. The charge-sheet against accused Nos. 1 to 3 was filed on 6th April, 1993, against accused Nos. 4 to 6 on 1st July, 1994, against accused Nos. 7 to 11 on 15th April, 1996 and against accused No. 12 on 26th November, 1996. The charges were that the accused persons and ...

Hanuman Datt and ors. Vs. State of M.P. and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2003MP190; 2002(4)MPHT343; 2002(4)MPLJ354

ORDERS.P. Khare, J.1. This is a revision by the plaintiffs under Section 115, CPC against the order by which their appeal under Order 43 Rule 1 (r), CPC challenging the order of the rejection of their application for temporary injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2, CPC filed in the suit, has been dismissed.2. A preliminary objection has been raised on behalf of the respondent No. 3 that the present revision is not maintainable in view of the proviso to Section 115(1), CPC. Reliance is placed by him on the decision of this Court in Sawal Singh v. Smt. Ramsakhi, 2002(4) M.P.H.T. 200 = 2002 (II) MPJR 169. This objection has been raised in several other revision petitions pending before this Court. Therefore, arguments were heard at length. Sarvashri Ravish Agrawal, Sr. Advocate, R.P. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate, R.P. Jain, R.S. Tiwari, P.D. Tiwari, Alok Aradhe and Ajay Mishra, Advocates have also addressed this Court on this point.3. The proviso to Section 115(1), CPC reads as under:--'Provid...

State of U.P. Vs. Abimanyu Abhiman Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1077

Y.R. Tripathi, J.1. This Government appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 13-9-1985 passed by Sri Tirtha Raj, Ilnd Addl. Sessions Judge, Banda in S.T. Nos. 10 and 511 of 1984 whereby the learned trial Court haying given the benefit of doubt to the respondents-accused has acquitted them of the charges under Sections 148, 302, I.P.G. read with Section 149, I.P.C. and 307, I.P.C. read with Section 149, I.P.C.2. The place of occurrence is village Piprahiya, which lies five kms to the south of the Police Station, Pailani.3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on 19-8-1982 around 8.00 a.m. deceased-Raj Bahadur Singh accompanied by his mother P.W. 2 Smt. Surswatia was going to the well lying at about 55 paces to the south west of his house to take bath. He was two paces ahead of his mother. When he had settled hardly a distance of 15 paces from his house it is said that the respondent along with one Angad (since absconding) reached there and on the extortion of responden...

Waseem Vs. State of U.P.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2003CriLJ1080

M.C. Jain, J.1. The appellant Waseem was charged under Section 307, I.P.C. but on trial was convicted under Section 324, I.P.C. and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of 15 months with a fine of Rs. 500/-. In default of payment of fine, he was 'ordered to undergo further six months rigorous imprisonment. Out of the amount of fine of Rs. 500/- half was directed to be paid to injured Bholu. The judgment was pronounced by Sri G.K. Gupta, the then XIII Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kanpur in Sessions Trial No. 255 of 1981. Aggrieved, he preferred this appeal.2. The facts lie in a short compass. The injured Bholu PW 1 and his brother Nurul Haq PW 3 resided in house No. 89/140, Ram Chandi Ka Akhara, Anwarganj, Kanpur. Their aunt Mst. Shamsun was living on the upper floor. The appellant used to come to meet the said lady and cut jokes with her. Bholu, injured of the present case used to raise objection on his behaviour, which annoyed him. The incident took place on 23-12-1979 at abo...