Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: nepali Sorted by: old Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 352 results (0.004 seconds)

Jan 09 2002 (HC)

Raj Bahadur @ Raju Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-09-2002

Reported in : 98(2002)DLT3; 2002(82)ECC791

..... as follows:'on 10.2.95 at about 3.40 p.m. si tarkeshwar singh was on patrolling duty in main bazar, paharganj. he received a secret information that one nepali often comes to diamond cafe to sell charas and at that time also he was standing outside the diamond cafe waiting for some customer and that he is in possession .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 18 2002 (HC)

Smt. Sushila Singh and ors. Vs. Driver Madhulal Rai and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Decided on : Jan-18-2002

Reported in : 2002(2)MPHT7(CG)

..... -2001, passed by a.d.j., durg, whereby application for withdrawal of f.d.r. amount has been rejected.3. counsel for the applicants submits that the deceased was a nepali and he died in an accident and the claimants are widow and children. he further submits that the amount is needed for treatment of the child of the deceased, who .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 20 2002 (HC)

Raju Gurung Vs. the State (U.T. Chandigarh)

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-20-2002

Reported in : 2002CriLJ3426

..... often used to come to section 18-a, chandigarh. thus witness knew the accused previously. no doubt, both suresh kumar and sewak ram had stated that they could identify the nepali boy if he comes across them. while stating the version as has come in the statement of sitla parshad they had not specifically named the petitioner-accused. admittedly, during the ..... been falsely named in this case on suspicion for the crime mainly on the ground that he was one of the nepali boys who were playing volley ball in the ground near veerka dairy in sector 18-a, chandigarh where other nepali boys were also playing with him. though prosecution had cited three eye-witnesses, namely, sitla parshad, suresh kumar and ram .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2002 (HC)

Gopal Lal Vs. Additional District and Sessions Judge and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-23-2002

Reported in : 2002(4)AWC2787

..... landlord-respondent no. 2, sharad chandra mishra filed a suit bearingsuit no, 156 of 1994 for ejectment of the petitioner-tenant from house no. ck-32/1, 2, 3, mohalla nepali khapra, varanasi, which is a non-residential accommodation in which one late smt. gangajali was the tenant. originally it was let out to kedar nath, who was tenant and after .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2002 (HC)

Radha and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-28-2002

Reported in : 2003(1)AWC455

..... are not necessarily women of bad character but have been driven to the profession due to acute poverty in their family. it was reported in the press that 1,200 nepali girls are sold every year by their parents and brought to brothels in calcutta and elsewhere because the parents cannot feed those girls. similar is the plight in various parts .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 27 2002 (TRI)

Society for Integrated Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Decided on : Dec-27-2002

Reported in : (2004)90ITD493(Hyd.)

..... , signed by mr. vardhan, it was stated that mr. vardhan met the representative of charity international, nepal, an n.g.o. which was contemplating starting a medical college to help nepalies and that during the discussion it was decided that sidur would come forward to render financial aid to facilitate setting up of the college and repayment would be made once ..... the college was established. that in this context he gave rs. 32 lakhs to k.m.c. this explanation is indeed specious. helping set-up a medical college for nepalies is hardly a charitable purpose which was further not put across to the executive committee of sidur. in his deposition mr. vardhan admitted that it was not as if sidur .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2002 (FN)

Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. Vs. Williams

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jan-08-2002

Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v. Williams - 534 U.S. 184 (2002) OCTOBER TERM, 2001 Syllabus TOYOTA MOTOR MANUFACTURING, KENTUCKY, INC. v. WILLIAMS CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT No. 00-1089. Argued November 7, 200l-Decided January 8, 2002 Claiming to be unable to perform her automobile assembly line job because she was disabled by carpal tunnel syndrome and related impairments, respondent sued petitioner, her former employer, for failing to provide her with a reasonable accommodation as required by the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), 42 U. S. C. 12112(b)(5)(A). The District Court granted petitioner summary judgment, holding that respondent's impairment did not qualify as a "disability" under the ADA because it had not "substantially limit[ed]" any "major life activit[y]," 12102(2)(A), and that there was no evidence that respondent had had a record of a substantially limiting impairment or that petitioner had regarded her as...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2002 (HC)

Down Mangor Valley, Residents Welfare Association, Represented Through ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-08-2002

Reported in : AIR2002Bom258; 2002(3)BomCR29; (2002)2BOMLR564; 2002(2)MhLj590

1. This Court while adjourning the matter on 12thDecember, 2001, had adjourned it with notice to theparties that the matter on the adjourned date would beheard both on admission and final hearing. In the lightof that, Rule. Heard forthwith. 2. Petitioners, M/s. Down Mangor ValleyResidents Welfare Association, are registered under theSocieties Registration Act. One of its aims andobjectives is to provide for a childrens park/garden inthe open space identified as Plot C of property known asBabquiadi surveyed under Survey No.59, P.T. SheetNo.150, Mangor Hill, Vasco da Gama. The petitioner no.2is the Joint Secretary of petitioner no.1. The Presidentand the Joint Secretary have been duly authorised by aResolution of petitioner no.1 to file the presentpetition. A few facts which are relevant for the purposeof disposal of this petition may now be set out. LateBruno Lizardo Fernandes was the owner of the propertywhich is the subject-matter of the present petition. Thesaid owner had applied to ...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2002 (HC)

Harish Chandra Tiwari Vs. Baiju

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jan-08-2002

Reported in : (2002)1UPLBEC313

K.T. Thomas, J. 1. We are sad that the disciplinary committee of the Bar Council of India (for short 'the disciplinary committee') despite being the acru statutory body entrusted with the upkeep of the probity of legal profession in India opted to treat a very grave professional misconduct in a comparatively lighter vein. The disciplinary committee held an advocate guilty of breach of trust for misappropriating the asset of a 'poor' client. But having held so, the disciplinary committee has chosen to impose a punishment of suspending the advocate from practice for a period of three years.2. The delinquent advocate filed this appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'). We told him that in the event of this Court upholding the finding of misconduct, he should show cause why the punishment shall not be enhanced to remove his name from the roll of the Bar Council of the State concerned. Notice on that aspect has been accepted by Mr. M. M. Kashyap, learned Coun...

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2002 (SC)

Harish Chandra Tiwari Vs. Baiju

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-08-2002

Reported in : AIR2002SC548; 2002(2)ALT10(SC); (2002)1CALLT16(SC); (2002)2CompLJ264(SC); [2002(1)JCR397(SC)]; JT2002(1)SC1; (2002)1MLJ139(SC); RLW2002(1)SC161; 2002(1)SCALE43; (2002)2SCC6

1. We are sad that the disciplinary committee of the Bar Council of India (for short 'the disciplinary committee') despite being the acru statutory body entrusted with the upkeep of the probity of legal profession in India opted to treat a very grave professional misconduct in a comparatively lighter vein. The disciplinary committee held an advocate guilty of breach of trust for misappropriating the asset of a "poor" client. But having held so, the disciplinary committee has chosen to impose a punishment of suspending the advocate from practice for a period of three years.2. The delinquent advocate filed this appeal under Section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961 (for short 'the Act'). We told him that in the event of this Court upholding the finding of misconduct, he should show cause why the punishment shall not be enhanced to remove his name from the roll of the Bar Council of the State concerned. Notice on that aspect has been accepted by Mr. M. M. Kashyap, learned Counsel for the appe...

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //