Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-18-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Crl. Appeal No. 1139/2012 Reserved on:17. h January, 2013 Date of Decision:18th February, 2013 % RAJIV @ DIWANJI Through ....Appellant Mr. Mukesh Kalia with Mr. Vikram Singh Saini and Mr. Mohit Popli, Advocates. Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. Respondent CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.Rajiv @ Diwanji, in this appeal, challenges his conviction under Section 302 and 364 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short). The impugned judgment dated 25th August, 2012, holds that the appellant had committed murder of Dalip Kumar Sajwani on 13th December, 2003, after abducting him. By order of sentence dated 27th August, 2012, for the offence under Section 302 IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to imprisonment for life and a fine of Rs.1000/-, in default of which he has to undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days. For the offence under Section 364 IPC, the appella...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-13-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:13. 02.2013 CEAC 16 2012 WIPRO LIMITED ..... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Petitioner : Mr Devnath, Mr Aditya Bhattacharya, Mr Abhishek Anand & Mr Bhuvnesh Satijha, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr Satish Kr. Senior Standing Counsel for R-2. CORAM: HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MR JUSTICE R.V.EASWAR JUDGMENT R.V. EASWAR, J This is an appeal by Wipro Ltd., which was formerly known as Wipro BPO Solutions. It was at the material time engaged in the rendering of IT-enabled services such as technical support services, backoffice services, customer-care services etc. to its various clients all of whom were situated outside India, i.e., in UK, USA and Australia.2. The appeal arises out of the order passed by the Central Excise & Service CEAC 16 2012 Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in order ST/593/2011(PB) on 05.10.2011, in Appeal No. ST/66/2008. On 12....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-12-2013
..... appellant has stated: q30. do you want to say anything else? a. police took me and other workers to ps. owner bindra got released other workers and since i was nepali, he did not get me released. on that day since i was tried, i went to the basement at about 7-8 pm and went to sleep. in the morning .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-12-2013
$~22. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CONT.CAS(C) 890/2012 & CM 2144/2013. % Judgment dated 12.02.2013 TARUN GUPTA Through : ..... Petitioner Mr.Nagmani Roy, Adv. versus DR. D. K. SHARMA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Rishan Kaushik, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI G.S.SISTANI, J.(ORAL) 1. By the present contempt petition, filed under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner alleges willful disobedience of the order passed by a Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) 6635/2012 on 22.11.2012.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents, who are the Doctors at AIIMS hospital, have failed to comply with the directions contained in the order dated 22.11.2012. Counsel further submits that in terms of the directions passed in W.P.(C) 6635/2012 on 22.11.2012, the petitioner appeared before the Medical Superintendent of respondent no.2 on the scheduled date and time with a copy of the said order, however, instead ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 526/2012 Reserved on:12. h December, 2012 Date of Decision:07. h February, 2013 % Anil @ Anu and Anr. Through ....Appellants Mr. Pradeep K. Bakshi, with Mr. Jitender Ratta, Advocates. Versus Respondent STATE OF NCT Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. P. GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J.Anil @ Annu and Narinder @ Vicky, by this appeal, impugn their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 vide judgment dated 20th December, 2011, arising out of FIR No. 368/2007, P.S. Uttam Nagar, Delhi, for murder of Deepak on 3rd May, 2007 at about 11.00 PM. By the order of sentence dated 21st December, 2011, they have been directed to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- each, in default of which they have to undergo simple imprisonment for six months.2. The fact that Deepak died an unnatural death in the intervening night of 3rd ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-07-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :8. h November, 2012 DECIDED ON :7. h February, 2013 + CRL.A.886/2011 SURENDER Through : ....Appellant Mr.D.B.Goswami, Advocate with Mr.S.Gaurav Sasan, Advocate. versus STATE (N.C.T. OF DELHI) .Respondent Through : Mr.Sanjay Lao & Ms.Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 21.02.2011 and order on sentence dated 06.04.2011 in Sessions Case No.312/2009 arising out of FIR No.20/2005 PS Vasant Vihar by which the appellant- Surender was convicted for committing offences punishable under Section 498A/302 IPC and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life with fine.2. On 16.01.2005 around 05.35 P.M., Meenakshi (appellants wife) was admitted in Safdarjung Hospital. On the basis of Daily Diary (DD) No.24A investigation was set into motion and assigned to SI Ram Avtar who with Const.Ganga Saran re...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: % + 30.01.2013 05.02.2013 W.P.(C.) No. 12730/2005 and C.M. Nos. 9505/2005, 13315/2005 & 12222/2007 ABC Through: ..... Petitioner Ms. Jayshree Satpute, Advocate. versus COMMISSIONER OF POLICE & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Anjum Javed, Advocate along with S.I. in person, for respondent No.1. Mr. A.J.Bhambhani & Mr. Apurv, Advocates for respondent No.2. Mr. S. D. Salwan, Advocate for respondent No.3. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI JUDGMENT VIPIN SANGHI, J.1. The present writ petition has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the petitioner herein on behalf of her daughter (minor at the time of filing of the present petition) as her mother and next friend, alleging violation of the right to privacy and confidentiality of her daughter under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, and other legal rights and seeking appropriate relief in respect thereof.2. The cau...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-01-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:07.01.2013 Judgment pronounced on:01.02.2013 CRL.A. 665/2009 MEHBOOB AHMED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. S.K.Sethi, Advocate. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. By the impugned judgment, dated 18.05.2009, the appellant Mehboob Ahmed has been convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short), for the murder of Rumana Praveen on 30.12.2005 in their residence, at H.No. F-277 Gali No.14 Khajuri Khas, Delhi. The appellant has been sentenced to life imprisonment and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in a default of which, he is to undergo simple imprisonment, for six months.2. The prosecution case is that on 30.12.2005, at around 10 a.m., the appellant, his step daughter- the deceased and Rubina Praveen (PW1), were present in his residence. Nasim Fatima (PW10), the mother of the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-16-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 25/2011 % Reserved on: Date of Decision:9. h October16. h January, 2013 SANDEEP KUMAR SAHU ..... Appellant Through Mr. Sunil K. Mittal, Ms. Deepti Gupta, Mr. Kshitij Mittal, Mr. Saurabh Balwani and Mr. Anshul Mittal, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 243/2011 KAUSHAL @ BABLOO ..... Appellant Through Mr. Rajesh Tyagi, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG SANJIV KHANNA, J: Sandeep Kumar Sahu and Kaushal @ Babloo impugn their conviction, under Section 302, 397 and 506-II of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and the sentences imposed upon them. They have been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.1,000/-, in default of which they are to undergo simple imprisonment for one month, for the offence under Section 302 IPC, rigorous imp...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-04-2013
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment delivered on:04. 01.2013 CRL. A. 388/1997 HARGIYAN SINGH ... Appellant ... Respondent versus STATE Advocates who appeared in this case: For the Appellant For the Respondent /State : Mr Avadh Bihari Kaushik, Amicus Curiae with Mr Pankaj Kumar and Mr Prakash Chandra : Ms Richa Kapur CORAM:HONBLE MR JUSTICE BADAR DURREZ AHMED HONBLE MS JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL JUDGMENT BADAR DURREZ AHMED, J 1.This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 09.04.1997 delivered by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Shahdara, Delhi in Sessions Case No.105/1996 arising out of FIR No.232/1990 under Section 302 IPC registered at police station Nand Nagri. By virtue of the said judgment, the appellant Hargiyan has been convicted for the murders of Smt. Rukmani and Mohd Sharif and the appellant has been held guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC. He was also convicted for the offence punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959. This appe...
Tag this Judgment!