Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL No. 75/2011 Reserved on:9. h January, 2013 Date of Decision:8. h April, 2013 % RAM DASS ....Appellant Through Mr. Rajiv Dutta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Narendra Kumar Choudhary, Mr. Kumar Dushyant Singh and Mr. Ajeet Singh, Advocates. Versus STATE Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL SANJIV KHANNA, J.:1. The impugned judgment dated 18th November, 2010 convicts Ram Dass under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC, for short) for murder of Sunil and Somnath, sons of Om Prakash, by causing injuries on them with firearm on 22 nd April, 2006. The appellant has been convicted under Section 323 IPC, for injuries on Om Prakash, by giving him a push, when he tried to intervene. By order of sentence dated 20th November, 2010 he has been sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC with fine of Rs.25,000/- and in default of paymen...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-05-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:5. h April, 2013. % + CS(OS) 586/2013 MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORPORATION & ANR .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Praveen Anand, Mr. Dhruv Anand, Ms. Udita & Mr. D. Sreekumar, Advocate. Versus GLENMARK PHARMACEUTICALS LTD ..... Defendant Through: Mr. A.M. Singhvi, Mr. Rajeev Nayar and Mr. Rajeev Virmani, Sr. Advocates with Ms. Prathiba M. Singh, Ms. Saya Choudhry, Mr. Varun Tikmani, Ms. Anusuya Mehrotra and Mr. Ashutosh Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J I.A. No.5167/2013 (of plaintiffs u/O 3.R-1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiffs in this suit for injunction restraining infringement of patent and for other ancillary reliefs, seek interim relief restraining the defendant from making, use, selling, distributing, advertising, offering for sale and in any other manner dealing in any product infringing the plaintiffs patent.2. It is the case of the plaintif...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :27. 02.2013 Date of decision:22. 03.2013 + W.P.(C) 4527/2010 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 640/2012 NUZIVEEDU SEEDS (P) LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anil Dutt, Ms. Ruchi Jain, Mr. Sudershan Shekhawat & Ms. Namisha Gupta, Advs. for the Petitioner in WP (C) No.4527/2010 and for Respondent No.3 in WP (C) No.640/2012. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Saket, Mr. Amarjeet Kumar & Mr. Manish Madhukar, Advs. for Respondent No.3 in WP (C) No.4527/2010 and for the Petitioner in WP (C) No.640/2012. Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC with Mr.Ashish Virmani, Ms.Ritika Jhurani and Ms.Sapna Chauhan, Advocates for Respondents 1 & 2 in WP (C) No.4527/2010 & WP (C) No.640/2012. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ WP (C) No. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-22-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on :27. 02.2013 Date of decision:22. 03.2013 + W.P.(C) 4527/2010 MAHARASHTRA HYBRID SEEDS CO LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS + ..... Respondents W.P.(C) 640/2012 NUZIVEEDU SEEDS (P) LTD ..... Petitioner versus UOI AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Anil Dutt, Ms. Ruchi Jain, Mr. Sudershan Shekhawat & Ms. Namisha Gupta, Advs. for the Petitioner in WP (C) No.4527/2010 and for Respondent No.3 in WP (C) No.640/2012. Mr. Jayant Bhushan, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Abhishek Saket, Mr. Amarjeet Kumar & Mr. Manish Madhukar, Advs. for Respondent No.3 in WP (C) No.4527/2010 and for the Petitioner in WP (C) No.640/2012. Mr. Rajeeve Mehra, ASG with Mr. Sachin Datta, CGSC with Mr.Ashish Virmani, Ms.Ritika Jhurani and Ms.Sapna Chauhan, Advocates for Respondents 1 & 2 in WP (C) No.4527/2010 & WP (C) No.640/2012. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ WP (C) No. ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-22-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:15. 02.2013 Judgment pronounced on :22. .03.2013 CRL.A.1348/2012 RADHEY SHYAM Through: .. Appellant Mr. G.K. Srivastava, Advocate Versus STATE NCT OF DELHI Through: .. Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The appellant Radhey Shyam, along with Raghu Raj and Giri Raj was sent up for trial under Sections 302/323/324 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) for committing the murder of Hari Prasad @ Babu, the deceased.2. Vide judgement dated 17.07.2012, the Additional Sessions Judge, Rohini Courts, Delhi convicted the appellant Radhey Shyam for offences under Section 302/324 IPC for stabbing the deceased with a knife and thereby committing murder. By virtue of order on sentence dated 31.07.2012, the appellant was to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and fine of `10,000/-was impose...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-15-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) 458/2009 % Reserved on:11. h January, 2013 Pronounced on:15. h March, 2013 RECKITT BENKISER INDIA LTD Through: ...... Appellant Mr. Aman Lekhi, Senior Advocate with Ms. Shikha Sachdev, Advocate. Versus WYETH LTD. Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Pravin Anand, Advocate with Mr. Vaishali Mittal, Advocate and Ms. Abhilasha Nautiyal, Advocate. CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J.MEHTA HONBLE MR. JUSTICE S.P. GARG To be referred to the Reporter or not? VALMIKI J.MEHTA, J 1.Reference has been made to this Full Bench, by a Division Bench of this court, vide the reference order dated 8.10.2010 in this FAO(OS), for this larger Bench to consider as to whether a Division Bench of this court in the case of Dabur India Ltd. Vs. Amit Jain & Anr. 2009 (39) PTC 10.(Del) (DB) has correctly held that publication abroad by existence of the design in the records of the Registrar of designs which is open for public inspection...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-14-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :7. h March, 2013 DECIDED ON :14. h March, 2013 + BAIL APPLICATION NO.1768/2011 & CRL.M.A.Nos.6754/2012, 13149/2012 & 13167/2012 TEJPAL SINGH SAATHI ....Petitioner Through : Mr.K.K.Sud, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Jayant K.Sud, Mr.Vishal Dabas & Mr.Chirag Khurana, Advocates. versus .Respondent STATE Through : Mr.M.N.Dudeja, APP. Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate for the complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. The petitioner has filed application for anticipatory bail in case FIR No.144/2011 registered under Section 193/420/467/471/120B IPC at PS EOW. Status report has been filed by the State.2. I have heard the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, Senior Counsel for the complainant and learned APP, and have examined the record. Counsel for the petitioner urged that the dispute with the complainant is primarily a civil dispute for which he has already filed suit for Declaration, Partition, Injunction and Rendition of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-08-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:8. h March, 2013 % + LPA 742/2012 SURESH CHAND GUPTA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Vinay Garg with Mr. Lalit Gupta & Mr. Deepak Agarwal, Advs. Versus MCD AND ORS Through: ..... Respondents Ms. Mini Pushkarna & Mr. S. Tyagi, Advs. for R-1&2. Mr. Nand Lal Kedia, Respondent No.5 in person (also represents R-4). CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra-court appeal impugns the judgment dated 16th August, 012 of the learned Single Judge, of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.811/2002 preferred by the appellant. The said writ petition was preferred impugning the order dated 13th July, 2001 of the Additional District Judge exercising powers as an Appellate Authority under Section 9 of the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 (PP Act) dismissing the appeal preferred by the appellant against the order dated 22 nd August, 1991 of the Estate Officer of the respon...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-08-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + RFA No.83/2007 Date of decision :8. h March, 2013 % VED PARKASH KHARBANDA ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Rajesh Katyal and Mr. S.S. Katyal, Advs. versus VIMAL BINDAL Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R.N. Oberoi, Ms. Ruchi Jain and Mr. Sarfaraz Ahmad, Advs. CORAM :HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA JUDGMENT 1 The appellant has challenged the judgment and decree for specific performance passed by the learned Trial Court. The appellant was the defendant and respondent was the plaintiff before the learned Trial Court. For the sake of convenience, the appellant and the respondent shall be referred to as per their ranks in the plaint as the defendant and plaintiff respectively.2. Plaintiffs case The plaintiff instituted a suit for specific performance, declaration and permanent injunction against the defendant on 21st August, 1997. The case set-up by the plaintiff in the plaint is as under:2.1 RFA No.83/2007 agreement with the...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-07-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:31. 01.2013 Judgment pronounced on:07. 03.2013 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1200/2011 DHARMENDER KUMAR PAL Through: Ms.Anu Narula, Advocate. .. Appellant Versus STATE .. Respondent Through: Ms.Richa Kapoor, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. Dharmender Kumar Pal impugns his conviction under Sections 302 and 392/397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) vide judgment dated 07.02.2011. By order dated 11.02.2011, the appellant has been sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for a term of 7 years for the offence punishable under Section 392/397 IPC and fine of Rs.5,000/- and in default thereof, to undergo simple imprisonment of two months. For the offence under Section 302 IPC, the appellant has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default of payment of fine, simple imprisonment for nine months. The...
Tag this Judgment!