Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-14-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Judgment reserved on :06. 05.2013 Judgment pronounced on :14. 05.2013 LA.APP. 29/2013 and CM No. 2277/2013 (condonation of delay of 2215 days in filing the appeal) BALWANT Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Deepak Khosla, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. for L&B And + LA.APP. 30/2013 & CM 2279/2013, 2281/2013, 2282/2013 RAM PHAL THR LRS & ANR Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Deepak Khosla, Advocate versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjeev Sahay, Adv. for L&B CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K. JAIN V.K. JAIN, J.CM Nos. 2277/2013 (condonation of delay of 2215 days in filing the appeal) in LA Appeal No. 29/2013 and 2280/2013 (condonation of delay of 1585 days in filing the appeal) in LA No. 30/2013 CM No. 2277/2013 has been filed in LA Appeal No. 29/2013 for condonation of delay of 221 days, whereas CM No. 2280/2013 has been filed in LA Appeal No. 30/2013 for condonation of dela...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : May-13-2013
G. George Paracken, Member (J) Applicants in this joint Original Application are serving as Senior Field Assistants(M) [SFAs(M) for short] and Assistant Field Officers(M) [AFOs(M) for short] in Sashastra Seema Bal (SSB for short) under the Ministry of Home Affairs. They are aggrieved by the alleged illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory action on the part of the Respondents in not giving them the Grade Pays of Rs.2400/- and Rs.2800/- respectively w.e.f. 1.1.2006 as given to their counter-parts serving in the various organizations under the Cabinet Secretariat. 2. The brief background of the case is that SSB was originally under the Cabinet Secretariat. From 14.01.2001, its administrative control was transferred to the Ministry of Home Affairs. However, the other similar organizations such as ARC, SSF and RAW continued to be under Cabinet Secretariat. All those organizations including SSB were having the posts of SFA and AFO and their pay scales from time to time were as under:-Details o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : National Green Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : May-09-2013
Swatanter Kumar, (Chairperson) 1. The Legislature has vested the Central Government with the power to issue directions, in writing, to any person, officer or authority, in exercise of its powers and in performance of its functions under the provisions of Section 5 of the Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986 (for short the Act). Section 5 has two distinct and significant features. Firstly, it opens with a non-obstante clause to give an overriding effect to such directions but such directions have to be subject to the provisions of the Act. Secondly, in explanation to Section 5, the scope of the power to issue directions has been described by use of inclusive language. It extends to issuance of directions even for closure, prohibition or regulation of any industry, operation or process. It further goes to the extent of issuing directions with regard to the stoppage or regulation of the supply of electricity or water or any other services. This wide power has been vested in the Central Go...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-08-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:19. 03.2013 Judgment pronounced on:08. 05.2013 1. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.496/2011 ASHISH @ DANGER Through: Mr. Sumeet (DHCLSC). ..... Appellant Verma, Advocate versus STATE Through:2. ..... Respondent Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1076/2010 NAZIM Through: Ms. Saahila (DHCLSC). ..... Appellant Lamba, Advocate versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. Ashish and Nazim have preferred these appeals against their conviction by the impugned judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge dated 30.03.2010 under Sections 302/34 of The Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of Vinod. By the order of sentence dated 31.03.2010, the appellants have been sentenced to imprisonment for life for the offence under Section 302/34 and with fine of `5,000/-. In case of default for payment of fine o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : May-06-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.A. 36/2011 Reserved on:11. h February, 2013 Decided on:6. h May, 2013 % VIKRAM KUMAR Through: versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. N.K. Deo, Advocate. ..... Respondent Mr. Manoj Ohri, APP with SI Aditya and Basant Kumar, PS Tilak Nagar. Coram: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA 1 The Appellant impugns the judgment dated 12th November, 2010 whereby he has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 376 (2) (f)/377/376 read with Sections 511/506/323 IPC. The Appellant also impugns the order on sentence dated 18 th November, 2010 whereby he has been directed to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 14 years for offence punishable under Section 376 (2) (f) IPC and fine of Rs. 1 lakh and in default of payment of fine to undergo Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of two years; Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of 10 years for offence punishable under Section 377 IPC with fine of Rs. 50,000/- and in default o...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-29-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h April, 2013. % + LPA No.500/2012 & CM No.11726/2012 (for stay) MANAGING COMMITTEE, NAVAL PUBLIC SCHOOL ...... Appellant Through: Ms. Jyoti Singh, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Amandeep Joshi, Advocate. Versus NEERA CHOPRA & ANR Through: ..... Respondent Mr. Chetan Lokur, Advocate for Mr. Viraj R. Datar, Advocate. CORAM:HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra Court appeal impugns the judgment dated 1 st May, 2012 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of W.P.(C) No.5390/2011 preferred by the appellant School. The appellant School had preferred the said writ petition impugning the order dated 27th May, 2011 of the Delhi School Tribunal (Tribunal) allowing Appeal No.41/2003 preferred by the respondent No.1. The said appeal was preferred by the respondent No.1 against the order dated 14 th October, 2003 of the appellant School issued with the approval dated 8th October, 2003 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-29-2013
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h April, 2013 % + LPA 788/2012 MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Dr. A.M. Singhvi and Mr. T.K. Ganju, Sr. Advocates with Mr. A.K. Thakur, Mr. R.K. Mishra and Mr. Aquib Ali, Advs. versus INDIA TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. C.M. Oberoi, Adv . with Ms. Surekha Raman, Adv. CORAM :HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW, J 1.This intra court appeal impugns the order dated 30 th October, 2012 of the learned Single Judge of dismissal of WP(C) 5011/2010 preferred by the appellant. The said writ petition was preferred impugning the legal notice dated 14th June, 2010 issued by the advocate for the respondent no.1 ITDC to the appellant of termination of the Lease Agreement of property No. C-119 Naraina Industrial Area, Phase 1, New Delhi with the petitioner and the consequent notice dated 1st July 2010 issued by the respondent No.2 ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-26-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment reserved on:10. 04.2013 Judgment pronounced on:26. 04.2013 CRL.A. 1470/2011 VINOD Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Ajay Verma, Advocate Through: ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, APP versus STATE CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL JUDGMENT SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J.1. The present appeal is directed against the judgment dated 13.07.2011 whereby the appellant has been convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short IPC) for committing the murder of deceased Sanjay on 30.07.2007 by inflicting multiple stabs injuries. By order of sentence dated 15.07.2011, the appellant is sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and a fine of `2000/- has also been imposed. In default of payment of fine, the appellant is to undergo Simple Imprisonment for a period of one month.2. We note that co-accused Kushal was declared juvenile by the Sessions Court vide order dated 0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-26-2013
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1317/2012 Reserved on :17. h April, 2013 Date of Decision:26. h April, 2013 % RAM LAL ..... Appellant Through Mr. Bhupesh Narula, Advocate. Versus THE STATE ..... Respondent Through Mr. Sanjay Lao, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.P. VAISH SANJIV KHANNA, J:1. The appellant Ram Lal impugns his conviction vide judgment dated 15th October, 2009. under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of Kalam on 6th September, 2006 at about 9.30-10.00 p.m. He has been sentenced to life imprisonment and fine of Rs.10,000/-, which, upon realization, is to be equally distributed amongst the family members of the deceased.2. There is ample evidence to show that Kalam died a homicidal death pursuant to injuries suffered by a sharp edged weapon. Dr. Sapna (PW-3), who was working as a Junior Resident at Safdarjung Hospital, had examined Kalam and had prepared his MLC (Ex.PW3...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-23-2013
..... on hearing her noise, her uncle woke up and raised alarm. the neighbours apprehended the accused at the spot. she elaborated that the accused was apprehended by her uncle, one nepali, her brother-in-law and his wife. however, he succeeded to flee the spot. the prosecution did not examine any such relative or neighbour to lend credence to the prosecutrixs .....
Tag this Judgment!