Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on : Feb-25-2002
Reported in : (2003)(2)SLJ213CAT
1. This Original Application has been filed by the applicant aggrieved by A-2 order dated 20.4.98 of the first respondent imposing upon him the penalty of withholding of one increment without cumulative effect for six months and A-4 order dated 29.12.98 of the second respondent as Appellate Authority rejecting his appeal and confirming the penalty imposed on him. He sought the following reliefs through this O.A.: (a) call for the records leading upto Annexure A-4 and quash Annexures A-2 and A-4. (b) declare that the applicant is not guilty of charges II and V shown in Annexure A-1. (c) direct the respondents to give promotion to the applicant to HS-I notionally w.e.f. 6.4.1995, with all consequential benefits.2. The applicant was a Mechanic Highly Skilled-II in the Naval Air Craft Yard (NAY for short) under the respondents. He was one of the Joint Consultative Machinery (JCM) IV Level member of HQ. Southern Naval Command. During 1994 he was the Secretary of the NAY Unit Works Committe...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on : Mar-04-2002
Reported in : (2003)(1)SLJ360CAT
1. The applicant, an orthopaedically handicapped unemployed youth, was sponsored by the Vocational Rehabilitation Centre, Trivandrum (A-1) for selection to the post of unskilled Labourer under the Headquarters, Southern Naval Command, Cochin against 3% quota reserved for the physically handicapped (A-2). The applicant thereafter sent aduly filled and verified attestation form (A-3). The applicant who was given to understand that he was selected, did not get appointment though 2 similarly selected candidates were appointed. He claims to have made enquiries at the Southern Naval Command, Cochin, when he is said to have been informed that he would soon receive appointment orders.Repeated enquiries entailed similar promises but no appointment order was issued according to the applicant. The applicant made a representation A-5 dated 18.6.99 to the 1st respondent. There was no response to that either. The applicant is aggrieved by the respondents' failure to issue appointment order to him a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on : Jul-05-2002
Reported in : (2003)(3)SLJ205CAT
1. The applicant who has been working as Senior Chargeman at the Naval Ship Repair Yard. Kochi, is aggrieved by A-1 order dated 12.3.2002 restricting the backwages payable to him to 75% of the actual pay for the period from 14.12.98 to 7.8.2001. He is also aggrieved by the inordinate delay in paying even the admitted amount.2. It would appear that by A-2 order dated 19.6.2001, this Bench of the Central Administrative Tribunal had set aside the penalty order dated 14.12.98 whereby the applicant had been removed from service and the appellate order dated 10.5.99 confirming the penalty so imposed.However, this Tribunal in the said order had made it clear that the 1st respondent therein was at liberty to proceed in accordance with the provisions of Sub-rule 21(a) of Rule 14 and forward the enquiry report and its findings to the competent higher Disciplinary Authority for an appropriate action. The 2nd respondent thereupon issued A-3 order reinstating the applicant in service with effect f...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on : Dec-18-2002
Reported in : (2004)(2)SLJ10CAT
1. Applicant who is presently working as Scientist/Engineer-SF under the 3rd respondent commenced service under the Kerala Government (Department of Technical Education) with effect from 8.12.67. While so, he applied for appointment in Keltron, a Government of Kerala Undertaking, through proper channel, and with prior permission of the then controlling authority. On being offered an appointment in Keltron, the applicant tendered his technical resignation from the Directorate of Technical Education. He was relieved from the Directorate of Technical Education with effect from 28.2.78. His technical resignation was accepted with effect from 28.2.78 as per A-1 order dated 3.7.78.Thus the applicant had rendered 10 years, 2 months and 20 days' service under the Government of Kerala before joining the Public Sector Undertaking, Keltron (Kerala State Electronic Development Cooperation).Under Keltron he had worked for 3 years, 9 months and 16 days. He left Keltron to take up employment with Vi...
Tag this Judgment!