Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-16-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Order delivered on:16. h December, 2014 % + CS(OS) 3761/2014 MICROMAX INFORMATICS LTD ..... Plaintiff Through Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra & Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advs. versus SHENZHEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD & ORS ..... Defendants Through Mr.Sudhir Chandra, Sr. Adv. with Mr.Nishchal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advs. for D-1. Mr.Jayant Bhushan, Sr.Adv. with Mr.M.S.Ananth, Adv. for D-2 & 3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. No.24487/2014 (U/s 149 CPC) Court fee has been deposited. The application is disposed of. I.A. No.24485/2014 (u/o XXXIX R.1 & 2 CPC) 1. The plaintiff Micromax Informatics Ltd., (hereinafter referred to as "Micromax") has filed this suit for permanent injunction for restraining infringement of the Ambient Services And Application Distributions Agreement (entered into by Micromax and defendants No.2 and 3 herein); damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up etc. against the d...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Feb-05-2014
$~ *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:- 5th February, 2014 + CRIMINAL APPEAL4131998 SUNIL KUMAR & ORS. ..... Appellant Through Mr. G.S. Sharma and Mr. R.A. Sharma, Advocates. versus GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through Ms. Rajdipa Behura, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.P. MITTAL SANJIV KHANNA, J.The third appellant, namely, Om Prakash @ Bengali brother of the other two appellants Sunil Kumar and Om Babu @ Pappu expired during the pendency of the present appeal. The present appeal, therefore, has been pressed on behalf of Sunil Kumar and Om Babu @ Pappu.2. The two appellants along with the deceased appellant Om Babu @ Pappu by the impugned judgment dated 17th September, 1998 stand convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for murder of Tejpal at about 8.00-8.30 p.m. on 2nd October, 1992. By order of sentence dated 19th September, 1998, the two appellants have been sentenced to life ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-04-2014
.* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Order delivered on: March 4, 2014 + CS(OS) 102/2013, I.A. No.932/2013 & I.A. No.2869/2014 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY & ANR ..... Plaintiffs Through Ms.Ekta Sarin, Adv. versus K.M SALIM ..... Defendant Through None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH MANMOHAN SINGH, J.1. Plaintiffs have filed a suit for injunction and damages for infringement of registered trade mark, infringement of copyright, passing off and act of unfair competition.2. Despite of service, on 15th March, 2013, the defendant chose not to appear in Court. He was proceeded ex-parte on 14th February, 2014. The plaintiffs filed an application under Order VII Rule 10 CPC for pronouncement of judgment against the defendant on account of failure to file the written statement and to contest the matter.3. Counsel for the plaintiffs made her submissions on merit also.4. Let me examine the case of plaintiffs on merit.5. The plaintiff No.1, the Coca-Cola Company (TCCC), is a corporati...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Mar-20-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: March 20, 2014 + CRL.A. 666/2009 VINOD @ CHAVANI Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Jaideep Malik, Advocate versus STATE (GOVT. OF NCT) OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Sharma, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J.1. Challenge in the present appeal is the impugned judgment and order on sentence dated 16.01.2008, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge had convicted the appellant for the commission of offence punishable under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred to as IPC) and sentenced him to undergo imprisonment for life together with fine of Rs.5,000/- or in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of one month.2. The case of the prosecution in brief is reproduced as under:- On 14.02.2005. Constable Ashok Kumar, while posted at PS Mangolpuri, was on duty in F a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Apr-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on: April 02, 2014 + CRL.A.694/1999 ABDUL RASHEED Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State CRL.A.1/2000 MOHD. YAMEEN Through: ..... Appellant Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: + CRL.A.4/2000 ABDUL HAMID ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Pramod Swarup, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Akshay Verma, Advocate. versus STATE Through: Crl.A. Nos. 694/1999, 1/2000 & 4/2000 ..... Respondent Ms. Richa Kapoor, Additional CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH GAMBHIR HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SUNITA GUPTA JUDGMENT KAILASH GAMBHIR, J1 The challenge in these appeals is to the impugned judgment dated 24.11.1999 and the order on sentence dated 29.11.1999, passed by the learned Additional ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi
Decided on : Apr-16-2014
V. Ajay Kumar, Member (J). 1. The applicant, a Constable in Delhi Police, filed the present OA questioning the legality and validity of the impugned Charge Memorandum dated 23.08.2013 (Annexure A1) and the Summary of Allegations dated 23.08.2013 (Annexure A2). 2. The charge leveled against the applicant reads as under: It is alleged against Ct. Satish Chand, No.6234/DAP(PIS No.28892790) that on 19.06.2013, he along with Ct. Parmanand, No.1659/DAP was deployed on patrolling duty outside PHQ on the pavement from main gate to exit gate (X-17) and they were provided with WT sets. On that day, Inspector Ramesh Chander as routine, checked the staff detailed on duty at the various points of PHQ Guard and when at about 4 PM the Inspector noticed a motor-cycle was unauthorizedly parked at the pavement, he made search for the deployed staff who were found from their duty point. He called both the Constables through HC Kanwar Singh on W.T. sets and they were found coming from Exit Gate of PHQ. Wh...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-02-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI RESERVED ON :28. h MARCH, 2014 DECIDED ON :02. d JULY, 2014 + CRL.A.No.1024/2011 MAN MOHAN VIKAL Through : ..... Appellant Mr.Ramesh Gupta, Sr.Advocate with Mr.Mukesh Kalia & Mr.Karan Sachdeva, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI Through : + ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CRL.A.No.1124/2011 & CRL.M.B.No.2830/2014 NEPAL CHAND ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukesh Kalia, Advocate with Mr.Karan Sachdeva, Advocate. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. AND + CRL.A.No.1099/2011 RAJESH BHATI ..... Appellant Through : Mr.Mukesh Kalia, Advocate with Mr.Karan Sachdeva, Advocate. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI Through : ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG S.P.GARG, J.1. Man Mohan Vikal (A-1), Nepal Chand (A-2) and Rajesh Bhati (A-3) impugn a judgment dated 30.07.2011 of learned Addl. Sessions Judge in Sessions Case No.88/08 arising out of FIR No.146/05 P...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-15-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT New Delhi Judgment Reserved on: July 10 , 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 15 , 2014 % + CRL.A. 532/1998 MOHD. ANIS & ANR Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.M.L.Yadav, Adv. versus NCT OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. By the present appeal, the appellants had challenged the judgment dated August 13, 1998 convicting them for offences under Sections 302/307/34 IPC and the order on sentence dated August 18, 1998 directing them to undergo imprisonment for life and fine of `3000/- each for offences under Sections 302/34 IPC and rigorous imprisonment for 5 years and to pay a fine of `5000/- for offence punishable under Section 307/34 IPC. During the pendency of the present appeal, appellant No.1 passed away and thus the appeal qua him stood abated. Thus, the present appeal is now confined to appellant No.2 Mohd.Khalid S/o Mo...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-17-2014
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2672014 Decided on 17th November, 2014 SMT. SANTOSHI & ORS Through: versus ..... Appellants Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. V.K. Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellants are legal heirs of Late Shri Ram Nath. They filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi seeking compensation of `4 lacs in respect of death of Shri Ram Nath in relation to Firozpur Janta Express train. She alleged that on 8th October, 2012 deceased-Ram Nath was travelling from Tuglakabad Station to New Delhi Railway Station by Firozpur Janta Express when he accidentally fell down from the crowded compartment of the running train near Shivaji Bridge, Delhi due to heavy rush and sudden jerk. Deceased was rushed to RML Hospital where he died on 10:50 pm on the same day.2. Respondent alleged that deceased did not die in an untoward incident within the m...
Tag this Judgment!