Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-26-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: August 26, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 1/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla versus RAVI KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus Curiae and Ms.Bhavita Modi, Advocate for Ravi Ms.Saahila Lamba, Amicus Curiae for Vinod @ Chottu Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate for Rahul CRL.A. 563/2014 RAHUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla CRL.A. 726/2014 RAVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-26-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: August 26, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 1/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla versus RAVI KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus Curiae and Ms.Bhavita Modi, Advocate for Ravi Ms.Saahila Lamba, Amicus Curiae for Vinod @ Chottu Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate for Rahul CRL.A. 563/2014 RAHUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla CRL.A. 726/2014 RAVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Aug-26-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Reserved on: August 12, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: August 26, 2014 + DEATH SENTENCE REF. 1/2014 STATE Represented by: ..... Petitioner Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla versus RAVI KUMAR & ORS. Represented by: ..... Respondents Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus Curiae and Ms.Bhavita Modi, Advocate for Ravi Ms.Saahila Lamba, Amicus Curiae for Vinod @ Chottu Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate for Rahul CRL.A. 563/2014 RAHUL Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.Vikas Padora, Advocate with Mr.Chaman Lal, Advocate versus STATE OF DELHI Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Varun Goswami, APP with Insp. Sandeep Gupta, Ranjeet Dhaka, SHO Bir Singh and ASI Nihal Singh, PS Chhawla CRL.A. 726/2014 RAVI Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.A.J.Bhambhani, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.S.B.Dandapani, Advocate/Amicus...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-24-2014
$~25 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ST.REF. 1/2013 Date of decision:24. h July, 2014 REMARI INDIA (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through Mr. A.K. Babbar and Mr. Surendra Kumar, Advocates. versus COMMISSIONER SALES TAX, DELHI ..... Respondent Through Mr. H.C. Bhatia, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO SANJIV KHANNA, J.(ORAL) Appellate Tribunal, Value Added Tax (Tribunal, for short) vide order dated 25th April, 2008 in Appeal No.49/STT/04-05 relating to assessment year 2000-01 (Local), has referred the following question of law to this Court under Section 45(1) of the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 (for short, Act):"Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the appellant Appellate Tribunal VAT was correct in holding that the transfer of property in the goods from the appellant company to M/s Hyaat, Katmandu (Nepal) took place after and not before the goods were cleared for export out of India?." 2. The Appeal No.49/STT/04-0...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-23-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 17, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 23, 2014 % + CRL.A. 969/2012 MAJID SHEIKH MANSOORI ..... Appellant Represented by: Ms.Arpan Wadhawan, Advocate for Ms.Manjusha, Advocate versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Lovkesh Sawhney, APP for the State with Inspector Mahesh Kasana, ATO/Sangam Vihar CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. Majid Sheikh Mansoori has been held guilty for having murdered his wife Vidya. The learned Trial Judge has returned the verdict of guilt believing Azaruddin PW-7 and Shakil Mohammad PW-19 to be truthful eye witnesses. Recovery of knife Ex.P-1 pursuant to Majid Sheikh Mansooris disclosure statement which was opined by Dr.Raghvinder Kumar PW-4 as capable of causing the 17 stab wounds on Vidya is the other incriminating evidence relied upon. After holding Majid Sheikh Mansoori guilty for the offence of murder vide impugned...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 24, 2014 + FAO(OS) 540/2014 SHENZEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Amisha Nagarajan, Mr.Nischal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates versus MICROMAX INFORMATICS LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra, Ms.Jyoti Pawar and Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Ashwani Mata, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.M.S.Ananth, Mr.A.Banarjee and Mr.Raghav Kapoor, Advocates for R-2 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. We shall be referring to the parties as under:- (a) Micromax Informatics Ltd. (The Plaintiff) : Micromax (b) Shenzhen OnePlus Technology Co.Ltd. (Defendant No.1) (c) : OnePlus Cyanogen Inc. and CyanogenMod LLC (Defendants No.2 &3) FAO (OS) No.540/2014 2. Micromax is the protagonist and OnePlus is the a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Dec-24-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision : December 24, 2014 + FAO(OS) 540/2014 SHENZEN ONEPLUS TECHNOLOGY CO LTD ..... Appellant Represented by: Mr.Kapil Sibal, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Amisha Nagarajan, Mr.Nischal Anand and Mr.Aman Taneja, Advocates versus MICROMAX INFORMATICS LIMITED ..... Respondent Represented by: Mr.Rajiv Nayar, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.Kirat Singh Nagra, Ms.Jyoti Pawar and Mr.Kartik Yadav, Advocates for R-1 Mr.Ashwani Mata, Sr.Advocate instructed by Mr.M.S.Ananth, Mr.A.Banarjee and Mr.Raghav Kapoor, Advocates for R-2 & R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA PRADEEP NANDRAJOG, J.1. We shall be referring to the parties as under:- (a) Micromax Informatics Ltd. (The Plaintiff) : Micromax (b) Shenzhen OnePlus Technology Co.Ltd. (Defendant No.1) (c) : OnePlus Cyanogen Inc. and CyanogenMod LLC (Defendants No.2 &3) FAO (OS) No.540/2014 2. Micromax is the protagonist and OnePlus is the a...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jul-28-2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment Reserved on: July 23, 2014 Judgment Delivered on: July 28, 2014 % + CRL.A. 207/2012 VIPIN @ KAKE Represented by: ..... Appellant Mr.H.R.Dhamija, Mr.N.S.Verma, Mr.N.S.Verma, Advs. versus STATE Represented by: ..... Respondent Mr.Vinod Diwakar, APP for State with Insp.Naresh Kumar PS Badarpur. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA MUKTA GUPTA, J.1. Vipin @ Kake has been held guilty of murder of Humayun. The finding of guilt has been returned on the basis of ocular testimony of Ram Avtar @ Bobby PW-15, the recovery of country made pistol with empty cartridge case at the instance of Vipin, FSL report and the mobile phone showing the presence of the appellant at the spot. All this happening on a sudden quarrel between Vipin and Humayun and could have been averted if Ram Avtar had reached in time with the ice-cream to cool their heated minds. The learned Trial Court after holding Vipin guilty for offenc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-17-2014
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2672014 Decided on 17th November, 2014 SMT. SANTOSHI & ORS Through: versus ..... Appellants Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. V.K. Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellants are legal heirs of Late Shri Ram Nath. They filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi seeking compensation of `4 lacs in respect of death of Shri Ram Nath in relation to Firozpur Janta Express train. She alleged that on 8th October, 2012 deceased-Ram Nath was travelling from Tuglakabad Station to New Delhi Railway Station by Firozpur Janta Express when he accidentally fell down from the crowded compartment of the running train near Shivaji Bridge, Delhi due to heavy rush and sudden jerk. Deceased was rushed to RML Hospital where he died on 10:50 pm on the same day.2. Respondent alleged that deceased did not die in an untoward incident within the m...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
Decided on : Nov-17-2014
$~9 * + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI FAO2672014 Decided on 17th November, 2014 SMT. SANTOSHI & ORS Through: versus ..... Appellants Mr. S.N. Parashar, Adv. UNION OF INDIA Through: ..... Respondent Mr. V.K. Jain, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. PATHAK A.K.PATHAK, J.(ORAL) 1. Appellants are legal heirs of Late Shri Ram Nath. They filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi seeking compensation of `4 lacs in respect of death of Shri Ram Nath in relation to Firozpur Janta Express train. She alleged that on 8th October, 2012 deceased-Ram Nath was travelling from Tuglakabad Station to New Delhi Railway Station by Firozpur Janta Express when he accidentally fell down from the crowded compartment of the running train near Shivaji Bridge, Delhi due to heavy rush and sudden jerk. Deceased was rushed to RML Hospital where he died on 10:50 pm on the same day.2. Respondent alleged that deceased did not die in an untoward incident within the m...
Tag this Judgment!