Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Needed - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 09 2026

Agro Needs Vs The State Tax Officer

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-09-2026

OF JUDICATURE AT MADRASDATED: 09-03-2026CORAMTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN and WMP Nos.9188 and 9190 of 2026 M/s.Agro Needs Represented by its partner Mr.P.Muthusamy, No.6/272, Kaalipettai, Pappireddipatti 635 302 ..Petitioner(s) Vs Federal Bank, St. Johns Matriculation Higher


Jun 03 1997

international Needs India Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT

Decided on: Jun-03-1997

Reported in: (1997)63ITD387(Bang.)

1. The appeal has been filed by the assessee against levy of penalty of Rs. 15,000 under section 271(1)(a).2. The assessee is a charitable society. Its entire income is exempt under the provisions of sections 11...


Jul 22 2013

Ved Vrat Sharma Vs. Auto Needs (i) Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jul-22-2013

2013 Decision on: July 22, 2013 VED VRAT SHARMA ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ramesh Kumar, Advocate. versus AUTO NEEDS (I) PVT. LTD. Through: ..... Defendant Mr. Sanat Kumar, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR ORDER 19 07.2013 IA


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 31 2023

M/S. Basic N Needs Engineers and Contractors vs Ministry of Micro Smal ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-31-2023

6078 OF 2023 PETITIONER: ANWAR SADATH AGED 45 YEARS S/O. ALI BAPPU, CHAKKRATHODI HOUSE, PROPRIETOR, M/S. BASIC 'N' NEEDS ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS, CHERUKUNNU, OTHUKKUNGAL P.O., MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 676528 BY ADVS. GEORGE MATHEW M.D.SASIKUMARAN ELSA DENNY PINDIS


Jul 19 2023

M/S. Basic N Needs Engineers and Contractors vs Ministry of Micro Smal ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Jul-19-2023

19TH DAY OF JULY 2023 / 28TH ASHADHA, 1945 WP(C) NO. 12908 OF 2023 PETITIONER/S: M/S. BASIC N NEEDS ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS AGED 47 YEARS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR ANVAR SADATH, S/O. ALI BAPPU, DOOR NO: 20/338.


May 24 2023

Biju Mathew vs Klm Axiva Finvest Ltd. (Formerly M/S. Needs Finvest Ltd ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: May-24-2023

ADVS. P.G.JAYASHANKAR P.K.RESHMA (KALARICKAL) S.RAJEEV SAJANA V.H SHAIJU GEORGE RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF IN CS: KLM AXIVA FINVEST LTD. (FORMERLY M/S. NEEDS FINVEST LTD.), CORPORATE OFFICE, 4TH FLOOR, D/NO. 1871/A 24, V.M. PLAZA, PALARIVATTOM, KOCHI , REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT


Dec 07 2016

M/S Child in Need Institute (Cini) Vs. Fourth Industrial Tribunal and ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-07-2016

2016 GA3487of 2016 GA3488of 2016 GA3490of 2016 GA3492of 2016 GA3493of 2016 GA3494of 2016 WP1043of 2016 M/S CHILD IN NEED INSTITUTE (CINI) versus FOURTH INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL & ORS.Appearance: Mr.Ranjan De, Advocate, Mr.B.Banerjee, Advocate For the Petitioner Mr.Saibal Mukherjee,


Feb 28 2017

M/S. Child in Need Institute (Need) Vs. Fourth Industrial Tribunal and ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-28-2017

of 2017 W.P.No.1043 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ORIGINAL SIDE M/S.CHILD IN NEED INSTITUTE (NEED) Versus FOURTH INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE Dr. SAMBUDDHA CHAKRABARTI Date : 28th February,


Mar 19 2012

Tvl.Revathi Home Needs Vs. the Assistant Commissioner.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-19-2012

ORDER1. Heard the learned counsels appearing for both sides.2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had submitted that the respondent had issued a notice, dated 30.11.2011, asking the petitioner to file its objections, if any,...


Jan 25 2013

“The First and Foremost Aspect Which Needs to Be Taken Note of Vs. S ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jan-25-2013

Jaswant Gir V. State of Punjab (2005)12 SCC 43.observed as under : “The first and foremost aspect which needs to be taken note of is that PW9 is not a person who had intimate relations or friendship


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial