Necessary Party - Judgment Search Results
Parties. Vs. Mrs. Anirudh Tiwari and Others
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Aug-01-2014
Kanchan 2014.08.06 09:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Chandigarh C.O.C.P.No.1981 of 2014 2 parties. In the affidavit dated 8.11.2004, it is stated that the judgment Annexure P-5 would be complied with within
B. Party No. 2: Alingal Mohamed Kutty Vs. A. Party: Vaniyanthodi Pathu ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Mar-06-1967
Reported in: AIR1968Ker70; 1968CriLJ351
itself it could clearly be seen that there is likelihood of a breach of peace ensuing if the parties are allowed to have their own way. The learned Magistrate was satisfied on the police report that to
Dr. Subramanian Swamy, President, All India Janatha Party, No. 1, Papa ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-03-1998
Reported in: 1998(1)CTC300
Court, or for the purpose of securing the ends of justice interference of the High Court is absolutely necessary, then nothing contained is Section 397(2), Cr.P.C. can limit or affect the exercise of the inherent power of
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Ratnakar Naik and ors. (Second Party Nos. 1 to 3) Vs. Golakh Chandra S ...
Court: Orissa
Decided on: Jan-21-1965
Reported in: AIR1966Ori56; 1966CriLJ279
discretion either to grant time to make the deposit or not. No formal order condoning the delay is necessary, an order of adjournment would suffice. The provisions of limitation embodied in the substantive provision of the sub-section … ORDERG.K. Misra, J.1. Second party Nos. 1 to 3 arc the petitioners. The proceeding is one under Section 147, Cr. P.C. It is
Turu Majhi and ors., (2nd Party) Vs. the State (Bimal Mukherjee, 1st P ...
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Feb-06-1953
Reported in: AIR1953Cal397,57CWN311
proceedings were started, that the petitioners Turu Majni and others, who are Sonthals and men of the second party, obtained settlement of the lands in 1927, but after cultivating the lands for some years, they abandoned the
Owners And Parties Interested In The Vessel M.v. Polaris Galaxy Vs. Ba ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-23-2022
of the view that Gulf Petrochem (GP) who is the customer of the plaintiff, is the proper and necessary party in the suit. Unless the plaintiff impleads GP as a party, the suit cannot be adjudicated to render … the dispute and the suit transaction and the Contract of Carriage (Bill of Lading) and hence is a necessary party. Gulf Petrochem is also a proper party whose presence is necessary for complete and final decision on questions
Communist Party Of India Marxist Vs. Dinesh Kumar Khara
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-11-2024
are within the validity period of fifteen days but that which have not been encashed by the political party yet shall be returned by the political party or the purchaser depending on who is in possession of
Shiv Sena Party Vs. B.C. Deshmukh and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-16-2005
of customary Law - Whether the customary practice prevalent in a community can prevail over the Statutory provisions, particularly a customary practice of Aliyasanthana can prevail over the provisions of Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act
Janatha Dal Party Vs. the Indian National Congress and ors
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-21-2014
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.38991 OF2013Janatha Dal Party … Petitioner Versus The Indian National Congress & Others … Respondents JUDGMENT K. S. Radhakrishnan, J.1. We are,
Indian Democratic Party and anr Vs. U.O.i. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-14-2014
Association and all colleges and institutions situated similarly to the members of the petitioner Association are concerned and necessary orders shall be issued by AICTE within ten days. Prayer for interim relief is ordered accordingly.” In SLP(C) … filed similar applications. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties, we direct to implead the applicants as party to C.A. No.9048/2012, extend the cut-off for counselling and admission as fixed by the final judgment and order
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free