Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Necessary Party - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Aug 01 2014

Parties. Vs. Mrs. Anirudh Tiwari and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Aug-01-2014

and integrity of this document Chandigarh C.O.C.P.No.1981 of 2014 2 parties. In the affidavit dated 8.11.2004, it is stated that the


Mar 06 1967

B. Party No. 2: Alingal Mohamed Kutty Vs. A. Party: Vaniyanthodi Pathu ...

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Mar-06-1967

Reported in: AIR1968Ker70; 1968CriLJ351

is likelihood of a breach of peace ensuing if the parties are allowed to have their own way. The learned Magistrate


Feb 03 1998

Dr. Subramanian Swamy, President, All India Janatha Party, No. 1, Papa ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-03-1998

Reported in: 1998(1)CTC300

ends of justice interference of the High Court is absolutely necessary, then nothing contained is Section 397(2), Cr.P.C. can limit or


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jan 21 1965

Ratnakar Naik and ors. (Second Party Nos. 1 to 3) Vs. Golakh Chandra S ...

Court: Orissa

Decided on: Jan-21-1965

Reported in: AIR1966Ori56; 1966CriLJ279

deposit or not. No formal order condoning the delay is necessary, an order of adjournment would suffice. The provisions of limitation … ORDERG.K. Misra, J.1. Second party Nos. 1 to 3 arc the petitioners. The proceeding is


Feb 06 1953

Turu Majhi and ors., (2nd Party) Vs. the State (Bimal Mukherjee, 1st P ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-06-1953

Reported in: AIR1953Cal397,57CWN311

and others, who are Sonthals and men of the second party, obtained settlement of the lands in 1927, but after cultivating


Sep 23 2022

Owners And Parties Interested In The Vessel M.v. Polaris Galaxy Vs. Ba ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-23-2022

is the customer of the plaintiff, is the proper and necessary party in the suit. Unless the plaintiff impleads GP as a … Contract of Carriage (Bill of Lading) and hence is a necessary party. Gulf Petrochem is also a proper party whose presence is


Mar 11 2024

Communist Party Of India Marxist Vs. Dinesh Kumar Khara

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-11-2024

but that which have not been encashed by the political party yet shall be returned by the political party or the


Jan 21 2014

Janatha Dal Party Vs. the Indian National Congress and ors

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-21-2014

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.38991 OF2013Janatha Dal Party … Petitioner Versus The Indian National Congress & Others …


Oct 14 2014

Indian Democratic Party and anr Vs. U.O.i. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Oct-14-2014

to the members of the petitioner Association are concerned and necessary orders shall be issued by AICTE within ten days. Prayer … for the parties, we direct to implead the applicants as party to C.A. No.9048/2012, extend the cut-off for counselling and admission


Apr 09 2018

Bharatiya Janata Party West Bengal Vs. The State of West Bengal

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-09-2018

INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (C) 302 OF2018Bharatiya Janata Party West Bengal Versus .... Petitioner(s) State of West Bengal &


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial