Nearness - Judgment Search Results
Near Vs. Minnesota
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-01-1931
Near v. Minnesota - 283 U.S. 697 (1931) U.S. Supreme Court Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931) Near
Juliet John J.V, AlbIn Bhavan Near Csi Church, Amaravilla P.O. Neyyant ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Feb-16-2009
Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken Judicial Member The applicant has applied for the post of Teacher Grade-IV (Mathematics/EM) in terms of Annx.A1 notification dated 23.2.08 issued by the respondents in Mathrubhumi, Employment News etc. She qualified the...
Ganesh Vilas Near Kittur and Another Vs. Samuel Baburao Dhawale and Ot ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Impugned Order On Ia.No.1 In Ep.No. 123/2013 Dtd. 10.10.2013 At Annexure-F On The File Of Principal...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vardhaman Chemicals, Near Sharda Ispat, Kamptee Road, Nagpur, a Partne ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR537; (2002)2BOMLR826; (2003)185CTR(Bom)163; 2003(160)ELT132(Bom); [2003]263ITR460(Bom); 2002(2)MhLj187
J.N. Patel, J.1. The petitioner-Assessee has approached thisCourt invoking its extra ordinary jurisdiction to quashand set aside the communications dated 10/8/1999(Annexure No.4) and 1/9/1999 (Annexure No.6), and forseeking declaration that the petitioner has made paymentin time...
Union of India Through General Manager, West and Others Vs. Yash Indus ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member 1. The present Petition is filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned judgment of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench, Rajasthan, Jaipur (in short, State...
Amal Ltd, Mumbai Vs. Mumbai. Near Prabhadevi Telephone Exchange, Dadar ...
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
that the AO has not given effect to the said direction till the date, even after lapse of nearly a couple of years. Going through the facts, both the parties concurred with the proposal to remand the
Represented By Its Secretary To Excise Department Bengaluru 560001 Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-30-2024
DIST. DHARWAD-580001. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, AGA) AND: M/S. VINAYAK HOTELS, CTS NO.4880/11, AIR PORT ROAD, NEAR HOSUR BRIDGE, HUBBALLI, R/BY. ITS PARTNER, SRI. ASHOK S/O GIRIMALLAPPA KOTI, AGE. 64 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. LINGARAJ
Tata Marcopolo Motors Limited Vs. The Tata Marcoplo Kratikarikarmika U ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-17-2023
SRI. S. N. MURTHY, SR. ADVOCATE FOR SRI.SHIVAKUMAR S. BADAWADAGI, ADVOCATE) AND:1. THE TATA MARCOPLO KRATIKARI KARMIKA UNION NEAR CHARANTIMATH GARDEN R R COLONY, 2ND CROSS HOSAYALLAPUR TQ. AND DIST. DHARWAD REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL SECRETARY2 THE
Benny,S/O George,Marinkoottathil Veedu,Near Thadipalam,Chuttupad Kara, ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-24-2023
THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 07.09.2000 CC 199/1995 OF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS -II, ALUVAREVISION PETITIONER/APPELLANT/ACCUSED: BENNY,S/O GEORGE,MARINKOOTTATHIL VEEDU, NEAR THADIPALAM,CHUTTUPADUKARA, EDAPALLY VILLAGE BY ADVS. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR SRI.K.S.MANU PUNUKKONNOOR RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE: STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH
The Land Acquisition Officer and Assistant Commissioner Koppal 583231 ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-23-2024
S/O ADVYACHAR, SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR’S PRALAHALADACHAR S/O NARASIMHACHAR, AGE: 67 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE AND ADVOCATE R/O: NEAR VITTALA TEMPLE, OLD BAJAR, TQ: KUSHTAGI, DIST: KOPPAL. …RESPONDENT (By SRI. LINGARAJ MARADI, ADVOCATE)THIS MFA IS FILED U/SEC.74
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free