Nearly - Judgment Search Results
Near Vs. Minnesota
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-01-1931
Near v. Minnesota - 283 U.S. 697 (1931) U.S. Supreme Court Near v. Minnesota, 283 U.S. 697 (1931) Near v. Minnesota No. 91 Argued January 30, 1931 Decided June 1, 1931 283 U.S. 697 APPEAL FROM...
Juliet John J.V, AlbIn Bhavan Near Csi Church, Amaravilla P.O. Neyyant ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Feb-16-2009
Hon'ble Mr. George Paracken Judicial Member The applicant has applied for the post of Teacher Grade-IV (Mathematics/EM) in terms of Annx.A1 notification dated 23.2.08 issued by the respondents in Mathrubhumi, Employment News etc. She qualified the...
Ganesh Vilas Near Kittur and Another Vs. Samuel Baburao Dhawale and Ot ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jan-20-2015
(Prayer: This Writ Petition Is Filed Under Articles 226 And 227 Of The Constitution Of India, Praying To Quash The Impugned Order On Ia.No.1 In Ep.No. 123/2013 Dtd. 10.10.2013 At Annexure-F On The File Of Principal...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Vardhaman Chemicals, Near Sharda Ispat, Kamptee Road, Nagpur, a Partne ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-02-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR537; (2002)2BOMLR826; (2003)185CTR(Bom)163; 2003(160)ELT132(Bom); [2003]263ITR460(Bom); 2002(2)MhLj187
J.N. Patel, J.1. The petitioner-Assessee has approached thisCourt invoking its extra ordinary jurisdiction to quashand set aside the communications dated 10/8/1999(Annexure No.4) and 1/9/1999 (Annexure No.6), and forseeking declaration that the petitioner has made paymentin time...
Union of India Through General Manager, West and Others Vs. Yash Indus ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Oct-03-2013
Dr. S.M. Kantikar, Member 1. The present Petition is filed under Section 21 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 against the impugned judgment of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Circuit Bench, Rajasthan, Jaipur (in short, State...
Amal Ltd, Mumbai Vs. Mumbai. Near Prabhadevi Telephone Exchange, Dadar ...
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-31-2014
that the AO has not given effect to the said direction till the date, even after lapse of nearly a couple of years. Going through the facts, both the parties concurred with the proposal to remand the
Represented By Its Secretary To Excise Department Bengaluru 560001 Vs. ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Jul-30-2024
- 1 - NC:2024. KHC-D:10728-DB WA No.100328 of 2023 C/W WA No.100095 of 2022 WA No.100321 of 2023 AND3OTHERS R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE30H DAY OF JULY, 2024 PRESENT...
Tata Marcopolo Motors Limited Vs. The Tata Marcoplo Kratikarikarmika U ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Mar-17-2023
- 1 - WP No.100208 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE17H DAY OF MARCH, 2023 R BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION No.100208 OF2023(L-RES) BETWEEN: TATA MARCOPOLO...
Benny,S/O George,Marinkoottathil Veedu,Near Thadipalam,Chuttupad Kara, ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-24-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.SOMARAJAN FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2023 / 3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1945 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT DATED 31.01.2003 IN CRA 439/2000 OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS COURT,...
The Land Acquisition Officer and Assistant Commissioner Koppal 583231 ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Sep-23-2024
-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23rd DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A.PATIL MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.102975 OF...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free