Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national institutes of technology act 2007 section 18 registrar Page 5 of about 5,977 results (0.222 seconds)

Apr 18 2013 (SC)

Samaj Parivartana Samudaya and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the details of the survey carried out. the said panchnamas were signed by, apart from the government representatives and the representative of the national institute of technology, surathkal, also by the concerned lessee or their representatives. the readings recorded during the field survey were shared with the concerned lessees or ..... teams consisting of one surveyor each from the karnataka forest department, karnataka mines and geological department, karnataka revenue department and a representative of the national institute of technology, surathkal. the field survey undertaken by each team was supervised by the joint team constituted by this court. during the field survey, ..... mining of unbelievable proportions in the bellary district of the state. it is in these circumstances, that the petitioner- samaj parivartana samudaya had instituted the present writ petition under article 32 of the constitution complaining of little or no corrective action on the part of the state; seeking .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 02 2006 (SC)

i.i.T. Kanpur Vs. Umesh Chandra and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2006(110)FLR420]; JT2006(5)SC326; 2006(5)SCALE182; (2006)5SCC664

..... the year 1979 being advertisement no. 14/1979. the indian institute of technology, kanpur, (hereinafter referred to as 'the institute') is a body corporate in terms of the provisions of the institutes of technology act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). it is an institute of national importance. it has its own board of directors. its ..... functions are laid down in section 13 of the act. the board of governors is responsible for general superintendence, directions and control of the affairs of the institute. ..... was appointed as junior pilot instructor (gliding) w.e.f. 05.01.1983 after being selected by the selection committee constituted under the provisions of the institute of technology act, 1961.7. that, thereafter, the petitioner upon selection was appointed as senior pilot instructor w.e.f. 24.06.1986. this order of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2013 (HC)

Satish Kumar Garg Vs. National Institute of Technology and Another

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... no.4616 o 1. in the high court of punjab and haryana at chandigarh cwp no.4616 of 2010 date of decision:17. 7.2013 satish kumar garg --petitioner versus national institute of technology and another --respondents coram: hon'ble mr.justice rakesh kumar jain present: mr.anurag goyal, advocate,for the petitioner mr.pankaj bali,advocate, for the respondents rakesh kumar jain .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2011 (SC)

Union of India and anr. Vs. Association of Unified Telecom Service Pro ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... justice of a.p. vs. l.v.a. dixitulu [(1979) 2 scc 34, union of india vs. pramod gupta [(2005) 12 scc 1] and national institute of technology vs. niraj kumar singh[(2007) 2 scc 481] has held: an order passed without jurisdiction would be a nullity. it will be a coram non judice ..... network; (vii) measures for the development of telecommunication technology and any other matter relatable to telecommunication industry in general; (viii) efficient management of available spectrum; (b) discharge the following functions, namely, :- (i) ensure ..... of license; (iv) measures to facilitate competition and promote efficiency in the operation of telecommunication services so as to facilitate growth in such services; (v) technological improvements in the services provided by the service providers; (vi) type of equipment to be used by the service providers after inspection of equipment used in the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 05 2015 (HC)

National Institute of Technology Multi Purpose Vs. M.K. Gopalan

Court : Kerala

..... court of kerala at ernakulam present: the honourable mr. justice dama seshadri naidu wednesday, the5h day of august201514th sravana, 1937 wp(c).no. 23413 of 2015 (b) -------------------------------------------- petitioner: the national institute of technology multi purpose co-operative society ltd no.1883 (nit multipurpose co-operative society ltd.) nit post, kozhikode rep. by its honorary secretary. by adv. sri.p.p.jacob respondents:1 ..... , it is evident that the petitioner could not produce the documents despite his best efforts. denial of opportunity, despite the delay in the disposal of the matter, may affect the institutional interest of the petitioner. it meets, i believe, the interest of justice, if the petitioner is given initially two weeks' time to enable it to produce the required records which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2011 (HC)

Suresh Kumar Sud and ors Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

..... this is the second round of battle for the petitioners who happen to be in the research faculty as scientific & design staff with respondent no.3, namely, the indian institute of technology, delhi (hereinafter referred to as the "iit, delhi"). admittedly, there are two well-defined services; one is the teaching cadre and, the other the scientific cadre, ..... makes a change, it affects the other iits also. it cannot, thus, be said that the decision which was taken by the government of india as a national level policy to give the benefit of enhancement of age of superannuation from 62 to 65 years to "all persons who were holding regular teaching positions on regular ..... technical educations under this ministry ", was contrary to the prevailing situation. 8. it will not be out of place to refer to section 21 of the institutes of technology act, 1961 which empowers the central government to grant financial aid to the iits after due appropriation made by parliament by law in this behalf. it is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 1970 (SC)

The State of Mysore Vs. H. Papanna Gowda and anr. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1971SC191; (1970)IILLJ683SC; (1970)3SCC545; [1971]2SCR831

..... initially been appointed by the director, indian institute of technology kharagpur as a peon. as a result of the act of 1956 the institution declared to be one of national importance, was constituted under the act providing inter alia that the employees who were working in the ..... punjab high court. the high court at bangalore went into the question rawer elaborately and noted that mere were many differences between the provisions of the indian institute of technology (kharagpur) act 1956, the act impugned in the punjab high court and the agricultural university act of 1963. in the punjab case the petitioner had ..... institute before were to hold office or service thereafter upon the same terms and conditions and with the same .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 29 2014 (HC)

Meenakshi College of Pharmacy and Research Centre Vs. All India Counci ...

Court : Delhi

..... college of education vs. national council for teacher education 180 (2011) dlt656 the matter finally reached the supreme court in ncte vs. vaishnav institute of technology and management (2012) 5 scc139 the supreme court set aside the judgments of this court and held; ..... carry out inspection, the regional committees also had the power of such inspection. the judgment of the division bench of madhya pradesh high court in vaishnav institute of technology and management vs. ncte was dissented from. the said view was affirmed by the division bench of this court in saheed capt. d.k. khola ..... i) that once recognition has been granted by the regional committee to an institution, the council has to ensure that such recognized institution functions in accordance with the ncte act; .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 13 1990 (HC)

National Institutes of Construction Management and Research (Nicmar) V ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : [1990]34ITD445(Mum)

..... and objects. for our purpose, the general information give at pages 1 and 2 of the said booklet is relevant and reads as under :'general informationintroductionthe national institute of construction management and research (nicmar) is an independent, autonomous, academic, non-government and non-profit making body. it is incorporated as a 'society ..... force for project exports was set up by the ministry of commerce, government of india. the task force recommended the setting up of a national institute of project management for the construction industry.in the same year, the builders association of india and the overseas construction council of india appointed a ..... e) to publish study materials, periodicals, reports and other literature relating to construction and other allied industries.(f) to undertake research for advancement of technology and management in construction and other industries.(g) to undertake consultancy, set up consultancy centres of its own and/or in collaboration with other .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2014 (HC)

Gurudas Mangruji Kamdi and Another Vs. The Hon’ble Chancellor of ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... of management, indian institute of science, indian space research organization or national research laboratory, nominated by the management council and academic council, ..... and information commissioners shall be persons with eminence in public life with wide knowledge and experience in law, science and technology, social service, management, journalism, mass media or administration and governance, also does not prescribe any basic qualification which ..... national repute or a recipient of padma award in the field of education; (ii) the principal secretary of the higher and technical education department or any officer not below the rank of principal secretary to government nominated by the state government, (iii) the director or head of an institute or organization of national repute, such as, indian institute of technology, indian institute .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //