Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national institutes of technology act 2007 section 18 registrar Sorted by: old Page 1 of about 6,248 results (0.210 seconds)

New State Ice Co. Vs. Liebmann

Court : US Supreme Court

..... and economic science, and to the discouragement to which proposals for betterment there have been subjected otherwise. there must be power in the states and the nation to remould, through experimentation, our economic practices and institutions to meet changing social and economic needs. i cannot believe that the framers of the fourteenth amendment, or the states which ratified it, intended to deprive ..... us of the power to correct the evils of technological unemployment and excess productive capacity which have attended progress in the useful arts. [ footnote 56 ] to stay experimentation in things social and economic is a grave responsibility. denial of the right to experiment may be fraught with serious consequences to the nation. it is one of the happy incidents of the .....

Connecticut Light and Power Co. Vs. Fpc

Court : US Supreme Court

..... single enterprise. congress is acutely aware of the existence and vitality of these state governments. it sometimes is moved to respect state rights and local institutions even when some degree of efficiency of a federal plan is thereby sacrificed. congress may think it expedient to avoid clashes between state and federal ..... table is a facility for transmission of interstate energy if any part of the load is generated without the state. it has never been questioned that, technologically, generation, transmission, distribution, and consumption are so fused and interdependent that the page 324 u. s. 530 whole enterprise is within the reach of ..... powers were clearly to be preserved to the state under the provisions of the federal power act." the connecticut public utilities commission joins with the national association of railroad and utilities commissioners, also appearing as amicus curiae, and they contend that the federal power commission's order regulating accounting practices exceeds .....

Jatindra Nath Set Vs. Jadavpur University and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1960Cal120,63CWN915

..... , as the ease may be. the college of engineering and technology (run by the national council of education) has been virtually functioning as a university. it is now considered necessary to give statutory recognition to the courses of studies and the degrees of this institution to enable it to function and develop as a unitary teaching ..... 2a) of the constitution. it will also be seen from this section that its first sub-section transfers the maintenance and management of an institution under the control of the national council. the first sub-section does not speak of any assets but confines itself to maintenance and management. the second sub-section transfers assets ..... 000/- shall, at any time or under any circumstances be spent or applied for starting and endowing or supporting any institution or institutions not wholly the property or not under the sole control of the said national council of education'. 16. now, it can certainly be very well and reasonably argued that by such transfer the .....

Amulya Kumar Talukdar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : AIR1960P& H284

..... or about 11th september 1951.(4) the act came into force on 15th september 1956. according to the preamble, the act was to declare the institution known as the indian institute of technology, kharagpur, to be an institution of national importance and to provide for its incorporation and matters connected therewith. section 5 was in the following terms:'5. (1) subject to the provisions of ..... this act every person who is permanently employed in the indian institute of technology at kharagpur immediately before the commencement of this act shall, on and from such .....

Madan Lal Chawla Vs. the Principal, Harcourt Butler Technological Inst ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1962All166

..... would be void.15. the next question, which is really an important question in the case is, whether the principal of the harcourt butler technological institute is entitled now to direct taking of disciplinary action against the petitioner and finally dismiss him. the petitioner was appointed by the deputy director of ..... kanpur and the government of uttar pradesh, a counter affidavit-has been filed by sri p. l. agnihotri, personal assistant-cum-administrative officer, harcourt butler technological institute, kanpur. so far as the factum of the appointment of the petitioner in 1951 is concerned, that has been admitted. it was contended that with effect ..... principal, harcourt butler technological institute, kanpur, and the director of industries has ceased to have any administrative control over the institute. it was said that the services of the petitioner were not very satisfactory and when he had gone on deputation to the national sugar institute the head of that institute had also given a .....

Shri Krishna Rangnath Mudholkar Vs. Gujarat University and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Reported in : AIR1962Guj88; (1962)0GLR204

..... list i. there are, in fact, a number of such institutions such as the indian council of agricultural research, indian agricultural research institute, indian veterinary research institute indian council of medical research, indian institute of sugar technology, central rice research institute and institute of hygiene and public health. finally entry 66 of list i ..... to the students who are not fortunate enough to have been lorn in or to reside in states having such institutions would retard national progress. there might be students in such institutions with lower standards who might, if they nave the means and the opportunity to drink deep from the springs ..... and affiliated colleges in regional languages in the present context of linguistic states would encourage fissiparous tendencies and foster regionalism and parochialism destructive of national unity and integration, the central government can as a matter of policy give directions to the commission to recommend to the universities that .....

The Gujarat University, Ahmedabad Vs. Krishna Ranganath Mudholkar and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1963SC703; (1963)GLR450(SC); [1963]Supp1SCR112

..... within the competence of the union parliament. such an interpretation would lead to the somewhat startling result that even in respect of national institutions or universities of national importance, power to legislate on the medium of instruction would vest in the legislature of the states within which they are situate, ..... under item 11 of list ii. it is manifest that the excluded heads deal primarily with education in institutions of national or special importance and institutions of higher education including research, sciences, technology and vocational training of labour. the power to legislate in respect of primary or secondary education is exclusively ..... vested in the states by item no. 11 of list ii, and power to legislate on medium of instruction in institutions .....

Dr. T.C.M. Pillai Vs. the Indian Institute of Technology  by Its Di ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1964)1MLJ70

..... of 1961), came into force on the 1st april, 1962. this act purported to declare certain institutes of technology to be institutions of national importance and provided for certain matters connected with such institutions. one of such institutions declared to be of national importance is the indian institute of technology, madras. the indian institute of technology, madras, was prior to this act a society registered under the societies registration act. from ..... is exercised by the union is not over the petitioner or persons like him. it is the control over the working of the institution in its broader aspect as an institute of national importance established for the purpose of promoting technological and scientific education. the control stops at a certain stage and does not proceed all along the line of the administration of the .....

R. Chitralekha and anr. Vs. State of Mysore and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1964SC1823; (1964)2MysLJ(SC)11; [1964]6SCR368

..... state under item 11 of list 11. it is manifest that the excluded heads deal primarily with education in institutions of national or special importance and institutions of higher education including research, sciences, technology and vocational training of labour............. power to legislate in respect of medium of instruction is, however not a ..... it does so, that is enough to invalidate that legislation. interference with academic standards would of necessity affect coordination and determination of standards amongst institutions of similar type all over the country and, therefore, upon the view taken in the gujarat university case(1) state legislation embodying previsions ..... marks. annexure iv dated july 6, 1963, relates to award of marks for the interview of candidates, seeking admission to engineering colleges and technical institutions. it was a letter written by the secretary to the government of mysore, education department, to the director of technical education in mysore bangalore .....

Ramanujam (G.) Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1968)IILLJ299Mad

..... orders must be held invalid.13. the madras high court in t.c.m. pillai v. indian institute of technology 1964 ii l.l.j. 311, has held that the dismissal of an assistant professor of metallurgy in the indian institute of technology without observing the mandatory procedure prescribed under the statute would be a nullity and liable to be interfered ..... without proper authority and the labourer should have the benefit of the declaration that he was still in the employment of the national dock labour board (1956) 1 all e.r. (vide supra) the privy council held that the contract of employment made by the university with the teachers did ..... of service still subsisted would rarely be made and would not be made not grant specific performance of contracts of service. the court distinguished the case vine v. national dock labour board (1956) 1 all e.r. on the ground that the circumstance in vine case was very special where the dismissal was shown to have been .....