Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national institutes of technology act 2007 section 18 registrar Court: chhattisgarh Page 1 of about 9 results (0.069 seconds)

Nov 19 2012 (HC)

Anil Kumar Bharadwaj Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... 16.04.2012 onwards.3. the facts, in brief, relevant for adjudication of this petition, are that the petitioner was pursuing b.tech course at the national institute of technology (for short `the nit') in the department of biotechnology. the petitioner was admitted against the reserved seat of scheduled caste category. a complaint was made against ..... is correct, it is the act of gross indiscipline and student wants to extract marks by threatening the faculty.4. committee feels that suitable action as per institute rules should be taken against the student and his parents also be informed for the same.".5. in the enquiry committee, the statement of pratima gupta, assistant ..... shoot the teacher if he was not declared successful in the exam. in the case of this nature, where a student, while pursing his education in the institution, gives a go-bye to all the norms of discipline, decent behaviour or good conduct, the academic atmosphere of the college/university is polluted, strict disciplinary .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 26 2015 (HC)

Pushyamitra Mishra @ P. M. Mishra and Another Vs. C.B.I., A.C.B. Branc ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... working as a regional officer in central regional office aict bhopal on deputation and the applicant no.2 at that time was working as an associate professor in maulana azad national institute of technology, bhopal. the applicant no.1 had allegedly sent ineligible members including applicant no.2 with the team of expert committee for the purpose of inspection, whereas the applicant no ..... , 1988 (hereinafter called as pc act) and section 120-b of the indian penal code (hereinafter called as ipc ). 2. the director (dr. appu kuttan k.k.), maulana azad national institute of technology, bhopal being authority competent to remove the applicants by its order dated 22.11.2012 granted sanction for prosecution against the applicants under section 19(1)(c) of the pc .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2015 (HC)

Ashish Kumar Sharma Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... ministry of health and family welfare, government of india; for faculty of education, the norms/ regulations formulated in consultations with national council of teacher education; for engineering and technology, pharmacy and management/business administration, the norms / regulations formulated in consultations with all india council for technical education; and the ..... first time under the ugc regulations, 2010 and the ugc regulations, 2010 are not applicable to the universities, colleges and other higher educational institutions coming under the purview of the state legislature unless the state government adopts and implements the scheme subject to the terms and conditions therein, ..... 2010. 56. we have noticed and held that the ugc regulations, 2010 are not applicable to the universities, colleges and other higher educational institutions coming under the purview of the state legislature unless the state government wish to adopt and implement the scheme subject to the terms and conditions .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 16 2009 (HC)

income Tax Officer Vs. Dhan Sai Srivas and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : (2009)226CTR598; [2009]315ITR318; [2009]183TAXMAN302(NULL)

..... central, state or provincial act or a local authority or a cooperative society, or a university, or indian institute of technology, or state or central government, or an institution having national/state level importance, or a institute of management notified by the central government, etc., at the time of voluntary retirement, or in the case of ..... ][(vii-b) the central government; or](vii-c) on institution, having importance throughout india or in any state or states, ..... or under a central, state or provincial act and an institution declared to be a university under section 3 of the university grants commission act, 1956; or(vii) an indian institute of technology within the meaning of clause (g) of section 3 of the institutes of technology act, 1961; or[(vii-a) any state government: or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 19 2006 (HC)

Mohd. Akbar Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : AIR2007Chh39; 2007(2)MPHT1

..... and the preamble of the chhattisgarh co-operative societies act, 1960.d) that the impugned amendment frustrates the object of the act to develop cooperatives as democratic institutions.42. learned counsel for the petitioners placed heavy reliance on anurudh prasad shastri v. state of m.p. 1993 (2) mpjr 33 contending that a ..... loans to the agriculturists for their economic and social empowerment and to augment their economic resources for self-sufficiency and to give a boost to the national productivity in agricultural produce. the conduct of the periodical elections is required to be organised in accordance with the provisions of the act rules and bye ..... of the act. the preamble of chhattisgarh co-operative societies act reads as under:an act to organize and develop co-operatives as instruments and people's institutions based on self-help, and mutual aid, and for curbing exploitation and ensuring socio-economic development of people with particular emphasis on weaker sections of society .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 18 2008 (HC)

Kamal Narayan Goswami Vs. Akhilesh Puri Goswami and ors.

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2009(3)MPHT94(CG)

..... . gandhi v. gopi nath and sons, whirlpool corporation v. registrar of trade marks, tin plate co. of india ltd. v. state of bihar, sheela devi v. jaspal singh and punjab national bank v. o.c. krishnan, this court held that where hierarchy of appeals is provided by the statute, party must exhaust the statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction.8 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (TRI)

Vincent Anty Vs. M/S. M.B. Kirloskar Oil Engine Limited, Through: Mana ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... 7. the supreme court has discussed the term consumer in the celebrated authority reported in laxmi engineering works v psg industrial institute, ii (1995) cpj 1 (sc) = 1995 3 scc 583, wherein it was held : the national commission appears to have been taken a consistent view that where a person purchases goods with a view to using such ..... of india, 2000-(sc3)-gjx-0287-sc, decided on april 26, 2000. 9. we have heard learned counsel for both the parties on preliminary objection. 10 in birla technologies limited v. neutral glass and allied industries limited., (2011) 1 supreme court cases 525, honble supreme court observed thus : 7. by its order dated 4.3.2004 ..... with no order as to costs.? 17. in m/s rohit chemical and allied industries pvt. ltd. national research development corporation, iv (2013) cpj 87 (nc), honble national commission observed thus : 22. in laxmi engineering works v. p.s.g. industrial institute, air 1995 sc 1428, it was held :- 12. now coming back to the definition of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2014 (TRI)

Vandana Global Limited Vs. M/S. Jaypee Engg. and Hydraulics Equipment ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... the supreme court has discussed the term consumer in the celebrated authority reported in laxmi engineering works v psg industrial institute, ii (1995) cpj 1 (sc) = 1995 3 scc 583, wherein it was held : the national commission appears to have been taken a consistent view that where a person purchases goods with a view to using ..... therefore, this commission has jurisdiction to take cognizance in the matter. 6. we have heard learned counsel for both the parties on preliminary objection. 7. in birla technologies limited v. neutral glass and allied industries limited. (supra), honble supreme court observed thus : 7. by its order dated 4.3.2004, the state commission ..... of consumer dispute and this commission has no jurisdiction to entertain the instant complaint. hence the complaint is liable to be dismissed. he placed reliance on birla technologies ltd. v. neutral glass and allied industries ltd. (2011) 1 supreme court cases 525; and rajeev metal works and others v. mineral and metal trading .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 17 2011 (HC)

Tata Engineering and Locomotive Company Ltd and Another Vs. State of M ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... there is an express legal bar engrafted in any of the provisions of the code or the concerned act (under which a criminal proceeding is instituted) to the institution and continuance of the proceedings and/or where there is a specific provision in the code or the concerned act, providing efficacious redress for the ..... vijayanagar steel ltd11, c.c. alavi haji vs. palapetty muhammed and another12, goa plast (p) ltd (supra), modi cements ltd. vs. kuchil kumar nandi13, electronics trade and technology development corpn. ltd. secunderabad vs. indian technologists and engineers (electronics) (p) ltd. and another, n. rangachari vs. bharat sanchar nigam ltd., gurcharan singh and another vs ..... noted its earlier decision in the case of saroj kumar poddar (supra). the aforesaid legal position was again affirmed by the supreme court in the case of national small industries corporation ltd. vs. harmeet singh paintal and another. the ratio of law laid down in the case of s.m.s. fharmaceuticals ltd (supra .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2014 (TRI)

Srei. Equipment Finance Private Limited, Through : Manager Vs. Ibrahim ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... the supreme court has discussed the term consumer in the celebrated authority reported in laxmi engineering works v psg industrial institute, ii (1995) cpj 1 (sc) = 1995 3 scc 583, wherein it was held : the national commission appears to have been taken a consistent view that where a person purchases goods with a view to using ..... complainant) had paid the entire consideration and he obtained possession of the crane on 09.04.2012 and appellant (o.p.) gave no objection certificate. 11 in birla technologies limited v. neutral glass and allied industries limited., (2011) 1 supreme court cases 525, honble supreme court observed thus : 7. by its order dated 4. ..... complaint is not maintainable?. 16. in m/s rohit chemical and allied industries pvt. ltd. national research development corporation, iv (2013) cpj 87 (nc), honble national commission observed thus : 22. in laxmi engineering works v. p.s.g. industrial institute, air 1995 sc 1428, it was held :- 12. now coming back to the definition .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //