Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national institutes of technology act 2007 section 18 registrar Court: supreme court of india Page 1 of about 733 results (0.150 seconds)

Association of Management of Private Colleges and Another Vs. All Indi ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... branches of engineering, technology, management, education, sciences and arts. he further contends that though one does not find a comma ..... is very wide and also comprehends engineering. the institutes of technology act, 1961 envisages imparting of education in technology and section 6(1) of the act empowers it to provide instruction and research in such branches of engineering and technology, science and arts as the institute may think fit. further, the national institute of technology act, 2007 envisages certain institutions of national importance to provide for instructions and research in .....

Asson. of Mgmt. of Private Colleges Vs. All India Council for Tech.Edu ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... branches of engineering, technology, management, education, sciences and arts. he further contends that though one does not find a comma ..... is very wide and also comprehends engineering . the institutes of technology act, 1961 envisages imparting of education in technology and section 6(1) of the act empowers it to provide instruction and research in such branches of engineering and technology, science and arts as the institute may think fit. further, the national institute of technology act, 2007 envisages certain institutions of national importance to provide for instructions and research in .....

National Institute Of Technology Vs. Om Prakash Rahi

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... refer to the various communications issued by this ministry on the rules and regulations for promotion under career advancement scheme (cas) for faculty members of the national institutes of technology (nits). the ministry has received a number of representations from the faculty members of the nits on the implementation of cas. the issue had also ..... india ministry of human resource development department of higher education shastri bhawan, new delhi dated, the 14th march, 2012 to the directors 17 of all the national institutes of technology(nits) subject: promotion of faculty members of nits under the career advancement scheme (cas) issue of necessary guidelines thereof regarding. sir/madam, i am ..... 2018 passed by the division bench of the high court of himachal pradesh at shimla which upheld the order passed by the director of the national institute of technology without going through the process of selection of the teachers in the higher pay band of rs. 37400 67000 with agp rs.9000 and re .....

Commissioner, Customs Central Excise And Service Tax, Patna Vs. M/s. S ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . respondents judgment dipankar datta, j.preface1 we are tasked to decide two civil appeals that centre around a common question: whether the educational institutions in question, viz. (i) the indian institute of technology, patna ( iit patna , hereafter) and (ii) the national institute of technology, rourkela ( nit rourkela , hereafter), are covered 1 by the definition of governmental authority in mega service tax exemption notification1 ( exemption notification , hereafter ..... be interpreted strictly and literally, with any ambiguity resolved in favour of the revenue. f) iit patna and nit rourkela are institutions incorporated under central statutes, i.e., the indian institute of technology act, 1961 ( the 1961 act , hereafter) and the national institutes of technology act, 2007 ( the 2007 act , hereafter), respectively, and they do not carry out any duties or responsibilities akin to schedule xii .....

Indian Institute of Technology, Vs. Raja Ram Verma and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... up research projects etc., but also linking up with other national institutes like iims, iisers, iisc., iits, nits, etc. the committee will also look into the role that iits have been playing and could play in the future to increase its role as a human resource and technology provider in support of inclusive national development in a rapidly developing/growing economy; and9. the committee ..... act runs as under:- "2. whereas the objects of the institutions known as the indian institute of technology, bombay, the college of engineering and technology, delhi, the indian institute of technology, kanpur and the indian institute of technology, madras are such as to make them institutions of national importance, it is hereby declared that each such institution is an institution of national importance."39. it is clear from section 2 of the aforesaid .....

K.Guruprasad Rao Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... original condition so as to regain its past glory (chapter v, pp. 110-114).3. the reports submitted by central institute of mining and fuel research, dhanbad (annexure-v) and national institute of technology, karnataka, surathkal (annexure-vi), based on technical field investigations conducted during the 2nd and 3rd weeks of november, 2011 ..... one of these meetings, the committee decided to avail of the services of central institute of mining and fuel research (cimfr), dhanbad, jharkhand for determination of safe blasting parameters to avoid damage to the temple and national institute of technology, karnataka, surathkal (hereinafter referred to as nit ) for assessment of the impact ..... bureau of mines, nagpur, shri m.s. kahlon, director general of mines safety and col. p. mishra, head of the indian photo interpretation institute (national remote sensing agency) for the purpose of inspecting the lime stone quarries referred to in the writ petition and the list submitted by the government of .....

National Institute of Technology and Anr. Vs. Pannalal Choudhury and A ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... (for judgment) s u p r e m e c o u r t o f i n d i a record of proceedings civil appeal no(s). 5070/2008 national institute of technology & anr. appellant(s) versus pannalal choudhury & anr. respondent(s) date :01. 07/2015 this appeal was called on for pronouncement of judgment today. for appellant(s) mr. shuvodeep roy ..... , which lies in a narrow compass, it is necessary to set out the relevant facts in brief infra.3) the appellant is a reputed technical educational institute in the country. it is known as "national institute of technology" (hereinafter referred to as nit ) at silchar in the state of assam. till 28.06.2002, it was functioning as regional engineering college (hereinafter referred to .....

National Institute of Technology and ors. Vs. Niraj Kumar Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2007SC1155; 2007(1)AWC897(SC); (SCSuppl)2007(2)CHN98; JT2007(3)SC163; (2007)IILLJ23SC; (2007)3MLJ100(SC); 2007(2)SCALE525; (2007)2SCC481; 2007(1)LC0197(SC); 2007AIRSCW1169; 2007(2)SCC481; 2007-II-LLJ-23(SC); 2007LawHerald(SC)679

..... this court.12. however, before passing appropriate order, i direct respondent no. 2 and 3, namely, director, national institute of technology, jamshedpur and registrar, national institute of technology, jamshedpur to appear in person before this court on 16.05.2006.9. it was directed that the contemnors shall ..... appear in person and file show cause, if they so desire. a show cause was filed by them. the registrar of the appellant - institute appeared in person. an application was filed by the director of the appellant - institute ..... was a grandson of his cousin brother. therefore, he was not entitled for appointment in terms of the scheme of the institute. the institute, therefore, committed an illegality in granting him such an appointment. moreover the purported the appointment on compassionate ground had been .....

Samaj Parivartana Samudaya and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Other ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the details of the survey carried out. the said panchnamas were signed by, apart from the government representatives and the representative of the national institute of technology, surathkal, also by the concerned lessee or their representatives. the readings recorded during the field survey were shared with the concerned lessees or ..... consisting of one surveyor each from the karnataka forest department, karnataka mines and geological department, karnataka revenue department and a representative of the national institute of technology, surathkal. the field survey undertaken by each team was supervised by the joint team constituted by this court. during the field survey, ..... category a and b leaseholders for recommencement of mining operations has also been assailed by questioning the credibility of the cec as an institution and the prolonged continuance of its members which, according to the leaseholders, have the tendency of effectuating unbridled powers. 18. relying on the provisions .....

Samaj Parivartana Samudaya and ors. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the details of the survey carried out. the said panchnamas were signed by, apart from the government representatives and the representative of the national institute of technology, surathkal, also by the concerned lessee or their representatives. the readings recorded during the field survey were shared with the concerned lessees or ..... teams consisting of one surveyor each from the karnataka forest department, karnataka mines and geological department, karnataka revenue department and a representative of the national institute of technology, surathkal. the field survey undertaken by each team was supervised by the joint team constituted by this court. during the field survey, ..... mining of unbelievable proportions in the bellary district of the state. it is in these circumstances, that the petitioner- samaj parivartana samudaya had instituted the present writ petition under article 32 of the constitution complaining of little or no corrective action on the part of the state; seeking .....