Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national capital region planning board act 1985 Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 8,488 results (0.165 seconds)

Mar 12 2018 (SC)

Rameshwar Vs. State of Haryana

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the tehsils of gurgaon, nuh and firojpur-jhirka of district gurgaon form part of national capital region. chapter iv of the ncr act deals with constitution and incorporation of the national capital region planning board. chapter iv of the ncr act deals with the regional plan which in terms of section 10 shall be a written statement and shall be ..... of the states of haryana, rajasthan and utter pradesh, the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the ncr act ) was enacted to provide for the constitution of planning board for preparation of a plan for the development of the national capital 46 region. reading of section 2(f) with schedule to the act ..... realtors pvt. ltd. and 6 m/s metro infrastructure pvt. ltd. submitted that after national capital region plan was notified on 17.09.2005, draft master plan for gurgaon manesar was notified on 11.07.2006, followed by final development plan which was notified on 05.02.2007. the act on the part of the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 05 2017 (HC)

Mangalmay Institute of Management & Technology and Anr vs.ggsip Univer ...

Court : Delhi

..... provided by or under this act, the limits of the area within which the university shall exercise its powers, shall be those of the national capital region as defined in the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (2 of 1985). (2) no college or institution situated within the jurisdiction of the university shall be compulsorily affiliated to ..... university shall exercise its powers shall be those of ncr as defined in the w.p.(c) 2377/2017 and connected matters page 46 of 59 national capital regional planning board, 1985; (ii) makes it mandatory for the respondents to grant affiliation if the institution agrees to accept the statute and ordinances; (iii) ..... . it is averred that the respondent no.1 university has the jurisdiction to grant affiliation to institutes, which are located in ncr as defined in national capital region planning board act, 1985. on january 16, 2017, the petitioner institute had applied to the respondent no.1 university for grant of affiliation. the petitioner .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 14 2015 (SC)

Savitri Devi Vs. State of U.P. and Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... .3.5. the greater noida and its allotees are directed not to carry on development and not to implement the master plan 2021 till the observations and directions of the national capital regional planning board are incorporated in master plan 2021 to the satisfaction of the national capital regional planning board. we make it clear that this direction shall not be applicable in those cases where the development is being ..... carried on in accordance with the earlier master plan of greater noida duly approved by the national capital regional planning board.6. we direct the chief secretary of the state to appoint officers not below the level of principal secretary (except the officers of industrial development .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2015 (HC)

Ashutosh Chamoli and Ors Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Universit ...

Court : Delhi

..... limits of the area within which the university shall exercise its powers, shall be those of the national capital region as defined in the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (2 of 1985). 38. the aforesaid statutory provision, thus, clearly empowers the university to affiliate colleges within the national capital region. although it is contended that the same would be ultra vires to the article 245 of the constitution ..... was disputed by msit by contending that msit is a minority institution and, therefore, did not require any no objection certificate. the learned counsel for msit also stated that the national commission for minority educational institutions, by an order dated 12.06.2013, had passed the necessary direction in this regard. in view of the statement on behalf of msit, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2015 (HC)

Aditya Sanwal and Ors Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University a ...

Court : Delhi

..... limits of the area within which the university shall exercise its powers, shall be those of the national capital region as defined in the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (2 of 1985). 38. the aforesaid statutory provision, thus, clearly empowers the university to affiliate colleges within the national capital region. although it is contended that the same would be ultra vires to the article 245 of the constitution ..... was disputed by msit by contending that msit is a minority institution and, therefore, did not require any no objection certificate. the learned counsel for msit also stated that the national commission for minority educational institutions, by an order dated 12.06.2013, had passed the necessary direction in this regard. in view of the statement on behalf of msit, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2015 (HC)

Sarapremashish Butola and Ors. Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha Uni ...

Court : Delhi

..... limits of the area within which the university shall exercise its powers, shall be those of the national capital region as defined in the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (2 of 1985). 38. the aforesaid statutory provision, thus, clearly empowers the university to affiliate colleges within the national capital region. although it is contended that the same would be ultra vires to the article 245 of the constitution ..... was disputed by msit by contending that msit is a minority institution and, therefore, did not require any no objection certificate. the learned counsel for msit also stated that the national commission for minority educational institutions, by an order dated 12.06.2013, had passed the necessary direction in this regard. in view of the statement on behalf of msit, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 23 2015 (HC)

Palak Gupta Vs. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University and Ors

Court : Delhi

..... limits of the area within which the university shall exercise its powers, shall be those of the national capital region as defined in the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (2 of 1985). 38. the aforesaid statutory provision, thus, clearly empowers the university to affiliate colleges within the national capital region. although it is contended that the same would be ultra vires to the article 245 of the constitution ..... was disputed by msit by contending that msit is a minority institution and, therefore, did not require any no objection certificate. the learned counsel for msit also stated that the national commission for minority educational institutions, by an order dated 12.06.2013, had passed the necessary direction in this regard. in view of the statement on behalf of msit, the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 02 2015 (HC)

Noida Mint Employees Union and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors.

Court : Delhi

..... the decision, and therefore this court would have territorial jurisdiction. (iii) the city of noida is situated within the national capital region and therefore this court would have jurisdiction in view of section 27 of the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the act ).5. none of the arguments urged on behalf of the ..... cause of action arising in noida automatically arises in delhi merely because noida is covered in the national capital region. noida is covered in the national capital region only for the purpose of said 1985 act which is only for development of the national capital region as per the act. the act does not change the law with respect to the arising ..... above, there is no merit in the petition, and the same is therefore dismissed with costs of rs.15,000/- payable to the prime minister s national relief fund within a period of four weeks from today. i may note that after hearing the arguments and before passing of the judgment, i asked the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 23 2014 (HC)

Present: Mr.Aashish Chopra Advocate Vs. Unknown

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh cwp no.19050 of 2012 2 pradesh. in furtherance of the avowed object of the planned development in this area, the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as 'the said act').was brought into force on 11.02.1985. though, land utilisation forms the ..... of the exercise under the said article and thus, all states are consenting parties to the scheme of the said act. a board known as the national capital region planning board (for short 'ncrpb') is required to be constituted under section 3 of the said act, which has been vested with the power and function to ..... the year 2005, perspective-2021. this regional plan was not mandatorily required to be static and that is why modification of the regional plan as also review and revision is envisaged under section 14 and 15 of the said act. in view of the large urbanisation taking place in the national capital region, a need was felt for such modification .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 30 2013 (HC)

***** Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... when the licence(s) were issued to the private respondents and if it is alleged that the land in dispute is the part of national capital region, the petitioners can always raise their grievance before the national capital region planning board in terms of national capital region planning board act, 1985. we, thus, are not inclined to interfere in this petition much less in this public interest litigation and hence the .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //