Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national capital region planning board act 1985 Page 1 of about 8,428 results (0.131 seconds)

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1996SC2231a; JT1996(6)SC129; 1996(5)SCALE21; [1996]Supp3SCR49

..... - 62 recommended that a statutory national capital region planning board should be set up for ensuring-balanced and harmonised development of the region. the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (capital region act) came into force on februaryll, 1985. the national capital region plan - 2001 (the regional plan) was published as a statutory document. in the words of the then chairperson, national capital region planning board, the purpose sought to be achieved by the regional plan was as under :the two important .....

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1996SC2231; (1996)4SCC750

..... and as such the mpd - 62 recommended that a statutory national capital region planning board should be set up for ensuring balanced and harmonised development of the region. the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (capital region act) came into force on february 11, 1985. the national capital region plan-2001 (the regional plan) was published as a statutory document. in the words of the then chairperson, national capital region planning board, the purpose sought to be achieved by the ..... regional plan was as under:the two important goals to be achieved by .....

Ghaziabad Development Authority and State of U.P. Vs. Delhi Auto and G ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC2263; JT1994(3)SC275; 1994(2)SCALE357; (1994)4SCC42; [1994]3SCR248; 1994(2)LC497(SC); (1994)2UPLBEC1373

..... uttar pradesh had amended the land use of the area indicated originally in the master plan for 'recreational' use and converted it to 'residential' use. on 3.7.1991 the national capital region planning board constituted under the national capital region planning board act, 1985 declined to approve the change of land use of that area ..... therein defines 'regional plan' to mean the plan prepared under this act for the development of the national capital region and for the control of land-uses etc., clause (m) defines 'sub-regional plan' to mean a plan prepared for a sub-region. section 3 provides for constitution by the central government of the national capital region planning board, in ..... before dealing with the remaining submissions, it would be appropriate to refer to certain provisions of the uttar pradesh urban planning and development act, 1973 and the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (referred hereafter as 'ncr act').12. the up act is made to provide for the development .....

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : (2006)4CompLJ450(SC); 111(2004)DLT345(SC); 2004(5)SCALE405; (2004)6SCC588

..... . 31. in exercise of power under section 10 of the ncr act, the government of india has prepared a regional plan - 2001 for national capital region as approved by the national capital region planning board constituted under section 3(1) of the ncr act. besides others, the union minister for works and housing ..... dated 12th september, 2000 in respect of the national capital region. it states : 'v. national capital region - interface an interface amongst the industrialists of delhi and those of the three national capital region states has been organized by the ministry of urban development, through the national capital region planning board on september 30, 2000 at vigyan bhawan ..... can be made available in a short time.' 34. the material on record shows that the national capital regional planning board has been taking initiative to encourage the shifting of the industries to national capital region. it appears that in january 2001, number of plots were available in the states of rajasthan .....

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2004SC4016; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)353; (2004)3CompLJ199(SC); JT2004(4)SC181; 2004(3)SCALE396; (2004)12SCC118

..... with environment issues pertaining to national capital region which may be referred to it by the central government. the epca has jurisdiction over the national capital region as defined in clause (f) of section 2 of the national capital region planning board act, 1985. the districts of gurgaon and faridabad are part of the national capital region, under section 2(f) ..... living nearby and also the wild animal's inhabiting the sanctuary pointing out that the mining and extraction of ground water had been banned in national capital territory of delhi and the ridge being protected as per the order of this. court, it is necessary, that the ridge on the haryana ..... it is averred, is a potential shelter belt against advancing desertification and has been notified a wildlife sanctuary and reserve forest by the government of national capital territory of delhi. regarding the mining activities, it is averred that for extraction of badarpur (silica sand), there is large scale mining activity on .....

Anand Buttons Ltd. Vs. State of Haryana and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC565; 2005(2)ALD106(SC); 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)216; 2005(1)AWC146(SC); 2005(1)CTC450; [2005(2)JCR276(SC)]; JT2004(10)SC397; 2004(10)SCALE354; (2005)9SCC164; (2005)1UPLBEC

..... integrated industrial parks and estates were developed by the state-corporation keeping in view the functional plan prepared by the planning board for the national capital region in accordance with the provisions of the national capital regional planning board act 1985.3. in order to fulfil the objective set out in the functional plan over an area of 30,242 sq. kms., of which 13,413 sq. kms. tell within ..... the haryana sub-region, 41 industrial estates of haryana were targeted for rapid industrial development. kundli industrial estate .....

M.C. Mehta Etc. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Etc.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 47(1992)DLT421a(SC)

..... dated december 17, 1991, air (prevention and control of pollution) act, 1981, the environment (protection act) 1986, national health policy, 1985, ancient monuments act, 1958, national capital region planning board act, 1985 and various other documents including reports of the experts on air pollution and environments. the parties have submitted ..... being stopped from functioning as a result of our orders. we, therefore, direct the state of haryana through the director, town and country planning department, haryana, chandigarh, the chief administrator faridabad complex administration, the deputy commissioner faridabad and the haryana urban development authority to demarcate, and ..... learned counsel for the parties at considerable length for several days. we have been taken through the provisions of delhi development act, 1957, master plan for delhi published in the gazette of india dated august 1, 1990, delhi development authority (zoning) regulations, 1983, delhi municipal corporation act, .....

Mehar Singh Rathi and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Reported in : (2006)144PLR349

..... were grouped together:1. that the said acquisition proceedings are against the contents of the regional plan 2001 (in short 'rp 2001') published by national capital region planning board (in short 'the ncr planning board') under (the) national capital regional planning board act 1985 (in short 'the ncr act 1985') in as much as the ..... delhi can be shifted. thus the proposal regarding acquisition of land for industrial purpose at bahadurgarh is in accordance with the policy of national capital region planning board and ministry of urban development & poverty alleviation government of india. the apprehension of the complainants that there will be unplanned development ..... the polluting industries located in non-conforming zone of delhi. in order to implement the orders of hon'ble supreme court of india national capital region planning board and ministry of urban development & poverty alleviation government of india had organized an interface between the ministry of urban development and the .....

Devendra Kumar Tyagi and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... also submits that the entire acquisition proceedings are vitiated as the respondents have failed to obtain the approval of development of the leather city project as a sub-regional plan under section 19 of the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as ncrpb act ). she further submits that such approval is mandatory in view of section 27 of the ncrpb act, which ..... referred to as the hpda ) vide its resolution dated 19.04.2005, has authorized the national capital region planning board (hereinafter referred to as the ncrpb ) to prepare master plan for hapur containing the leather city project termed as sub- regional plan. subsequently, the ncrpb in june, 2009, issued draft sub-regional plan but without indicating the leather city project. thereafter, the hpda has made series of requests dated .....

S.K. Zaman Vs. Ministry of Urban Development and ors.

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 146(2008)DLT758; 2008(3)SLJ529(Delhi)

..... the recruitment rules. pertinently, the recruitment rules are statutory in nature having been framed in exercise of powers conferred upon the national capital region planning board under section 37 of the national capital region planning board act, 1985. the said recruitment rules were framed in the year 1997 i.e. much after issuance of office ..... as respondent no.3.2. on 16.4.2003, the respondent no. 1 invited application for filling up the post of chief regional planner in national capital region planning board (hereinafter referred to as the board) on deputation basis from the candidates having the following qualifications and experience:qualification:essential : p.g ..... institute of town planners as 'equivalent' to a post graduate degree in urban regional planning and in failing to appreciate that respondent no.3 had only 8 years experience working as a joint director with national capital region planning board and he cannot be said to be having the requisite 15 years experience .....