Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: national capital region planning board act 1985 Sorted by: recent Court: allahabad Page 1 of about 143 results (0.143 seconds)

Oct 21 2011 (HC)

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... the provisions of national capital regional planning board act, 1985 where under a regional plan is to be prepared and the states are to prepare a respective sub-regional plans. the provisions of national capital regional planning board act, 1985 overrides the provisions of any other act. moreover, development in the area falling within the national capital region take place only with prior concurrence of the national capital region board. the national capital regional planning board has already prepared regional plan upto 2021. the ..... village sakipur hearing has also been completed. one of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that there has been no approval of the plan by the national capital regional planning board as required by national capital regional planning board act, 1985. reliance has also been placed on a decision of hon'ble apex court in writ petition (civil) no.67 of 2007, jai prakash tyagi .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 26 2005 (HC)

Suraksha Rani Chopra Wife of Mahendra Lal Chopra and Yogesh Kumar Chop ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(4)AWC3372

..... planning board for the preparation of1 a plan for the development of national capital region and for co-ordinating and monitoring the implementation of such plan and for evolving harmonized policies for the control of land-uses ..... approval dated 29.10.1998 of the state government, providing for compounding the construction made in contravention of the sanction plan, to the extent permissible therein, and only in cases covered by the same.9. ghaziabad is also covered by the provisions of national capital region planning board act, 1985 and some of the provisions of the said act mandatorily provides for constitution of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 09 2002 (HC)

R.K. Mittal and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002(1)AWC558; (2002)1UPLBEC444

..... to commercial purpose. hence, user by the petitioners of the residential plot in question for commercial purpose is clearly illegal.12. moreover, the national capital region planning board act, 1985 (which applies to n.o.l.d.a. also) has provided in section 29 that no development should be made in the ..... region which is inconsistent with the regional plan as finally published. under section 29(2), the board can direct any state which violates the original plan to stop such violation. thus, even the state government cannot violate the original plan which has been finally published.13. in the impugned ..... necessary. under section 15, penalty can be imposed for contravening any provision of the act or rules.9. the new okhla industrial development area (preparation and finalisation of plan) regulations, 1991, defines 'residential use' in regulation 2 (k) as follows :' 'residential use' means use in a land and building or part thereof for human .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 02 2010 (HC)

Narendra Road Lines Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Up, and ors.

Court : Allahabad

..... rs.20.65 crores for the development of this transport nagar and widening of the national high no.91 into four lanes. therefore, the proposal was approved by the board and it got the sanction from the national capital region planning board and ultimately the government invoked the power under section 17 (4) read with ..... congestion in delhi and national capital region. therefore, in the present situation, it cannot be said that the invocation of section 5-a was for ulterior purpose or was arbitrary exercise of the power. since the master plan has already been prepared and it has been approved by the planning board and they have ..... are seriously lacking. in order to provide infrastructural facilities for developing industries throughout the yamuna belt, the project of national importance was taken up connecting various cities of uttar pradesh to the national capital. the jaiprakash associates ltd. was shortlisted to execute the project within stipulated time. the acquisition is thus clearly for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 30 1973 (HC)

U.P. State Warehousing Corporation Vs. Income-tax Officer, A-ward and ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : [1974]94ITR129(All)

..... -committee (1945) remarked ; ' the construction of a chain of warehouses is unlikely to attract immediately sufficient private capital. hence, we recommend that the state should itself undertake the planning and construction of warehouses at all nuclear points of trade in agricultural produce. the warehousing system should be operated by ..... . the constitution of co-operative societies was contemplated for carrying out warehousing functions below sub-divisional level. 19. in 1962, parliament enacted the national co-operative development corporation act, 1962, and the warehousing corporations act, 1962. these acts repealed the 1956 act. the state warehousing corporation established ..... , marketing centres of all-india importance and specialised storage techniques, like cold storage. the state warehousing corporations function at marketing centres of regional and state importance requiring storage facilities from 2,000 to 4,000 tonnes. the rest of the areas needing storage facilities below 2, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 12 2013 (HC)

Ajay Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. Thru Secy. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... "103. first, few general observations. minerals - like rivers and forests - are a valuable natural resource. minerals constitute our national wealth and are vital raw-material for infrastructure, capital goods and basic industries. the conservation, preservation and intelligent utilization of minerals are not only need of the day but are also ..... necessary that the mining of minor minerals is subjected to simpler but strict regulatory regime and carried out only under an approved framework of mining plan, which should provide for reclamation and rehabilitation of the mined out areas. further, while granting mining leases by the respective state governments "location of ..... minor minerals by the respective state governments. these should specifically include the provision for reclamation and rehabilitation of mined out area, progressive mine closure plan and post mine land use. 4.6 creation of separate corpus for reclamation / rehabilitation of mines of minor minerals: mining of minor minerals, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 11 2012 (HC)

Shashi Kumar Dwivedi and Others Vs. State of U.P

Court : Allahabad

..... the said order dated 16th august, 2005 is reproduced below:- "rajiv gandhi post graduate college, kotwa, jamunipur, allahabad uttar pradesh submitted an application to the northern regional committee of national council for teacher education for grant of recognition for btc of two year duration in terms of section 15(1) of ncte act, 1993. 2. now, ..... in our opinion, is expected to deal with applications for establishing new b.ed. colleges or allowing increase in intake capacity, keeping in view 1993 act and planned and coordinated development of teacher-education system in the country. it is neither open to the state government nor to a university to consider the local conditions or ..... the submission raised. the impugned act which enables only a proposal of a sponsoring body to be notified as a university is not likely to attract private capital and a university so notified cannot provide education of any kind much less of good quality to a large body of students. what is necessary is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2012 (HC)

Brij Kishore Verma Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court : Allahabad

..... or maintain consistent agency policy, for purpose of determining whether notice and comment rule making is required under the administrative procedure act (apa), 5 u.s.c.a. $ 553--national family planning and reproductive health ass'n. inc. v. sullivan, 979 f.2d 227, 298 u.s. app. d.c. 288.--admn. law 382.1. c.a. 9 (hawai ..... vs. the indian aluminium co. ltd.; air 1970 sc 228: indu bhusan bose. vs. rama sundari debi and another; 2006 (10) adj 86: sumac intl. ltd. vs. pnb capital services and the official liquidator, high court of allahabad and uttaranchal; (1998) 5 scc 637: state of tripura. vs. tripura bar assn. and ors.; (1998) 2 scc 516: state ..... scc 381: upen chandra gogoi. vs. state of assam and others; (2004) 8 scc 599: satchidananda mishra. vs. state of orissa and others and (2006) 1 scc 530: regional manager, sbi vs rakesh kumar tewari. in view of the above, since the impugned notification issued during the census operation being violative of rule 8 (4) of census rules, 1990 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 07 2012 (HC)

Reliance Industries Limited and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... power is only illustrative and does not in any way restrict the general power. 216. in ashoka marketing ltd. v. punjab national bank reported in (1990) 4 scc 406, hon'ble supreme court held as under:. the latin maxim, leges posteriores priores ..... empowers to maintain a data bank of information on activities relating to petroleum, petroleum products and natural gas to enable planning and development thereof. it also empowers the appellate tribunal for electricity established under section 110 of the electricity act, 2003 ..... or from the date the act was brought into force. in (2000) 5 scc 415 rishabh agro industries ltd. vs. p.n.b. capital services ltd. their lordships held that the word 'deemed' means 'supposed', 'considered', 'construed', 'thought', 'taken to be', or ' ..... --see the constitution bench decision in tisco vs. s.r. sarkar and the decisions in manganese ore (india) ltd. vs. regional asst. commr. of sales tax and union of india vs. k.g. khosla and co. ltd. similarly, where the question .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 07 2011 (HC)

Power Grid Corp. of India Limited Vs. Ajay Kumar Gupta and Others

Court : Allahabad

..... the corporation has an electric sub-station in district bareilly and another at mandola, district ghaziabad. the sub-station at mandola is meant for distributing electricity in the national capital region (the ncr). 5. there is already an electric transmission line between bareilly and mandola sub-stations. however, in order to augment the distribution of electricity in the ..... under section 16 of the telegraph act. in view of this, the contesting respondents do not have prima facie case. 29. the electricity is necessary for national development as well as for welfare of citizens. this can happen only if electricity generated at one part is transmitted to that part where it is needed. ..... irreparable loss to the contesting respondents; on the contrary, if the tower is not erected and electrical lines are not laid then the loss is of the nation and the public at large in the ncr. 31. the contesting respondents neither have prima facie case nor balance of convenience is in their favour. there is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //