Narrowing - Judgment Search Results
Seal Narrow Tapes Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Feb-01-2002
Reported in: (2002)(84)ECC133
1. The appellant is engaged in the manufacture of HDPE tapes, HDPE fabrics and HDPE sacks. The appellants' factory was visited by the, central excise officers on 30-6-98, who conducted various checks and verifications. As a...
Eskay Narrow Fabrics P. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-01-2003
1. This case was argued on 16.10.2002, 30.01.2003 and then to 13.03.2003. The issue involved is classification of Ultrasonic Lace Sewing Machine. The appellants claim classification under sub-heading 8452.29 which was accepted by the group Assistant...
Eskay Narrow Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-02-2003
Reported in: (2003)(157)ELT660Tri(Mum.)bai
1. This case was argued on 16-10-2002, 30-1-2003 and then on 13-3-2003.The issue involved is classification of Ultrasonic Lace Sewing Machine.The appellants claim classification under subheading 8452.29 which was accepted by the group Assistant Commissioner vide...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Eskay Narrow Fabrics Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-13-1998
Reported in: (1999)(113)ELT315Tri(Mum.)bai
1. The application is against the impugned order of the Commissioner of Customs (Appeals), Airport, Mumbai whereby the Commissioner (Appeals) has set aside the order dated 18-10-1995 passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Customs classifying the...
Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Seal Narrow Tapes Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-03-1997
Reported in: (1998)(98)ELT476TriDel
1. The appeal by the department is against the order-in-appeal passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals), Calcutta holding that the appellants before him who are respondents herein were eligible for the refund as ordered...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free