N A V First - Judgment Search Results

N.V. Jayagopal Vs. N.V. Vijayagopalan and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2003KAR3910

as joint family properties and that all the coparceners have equal right over the same. Hence, it is necessary to add this properties. 3. The petitioner herein has filed detailed objections to the said IA contending that … that in the present case, the 1st respondent has filed I.A. after the commencement of the trial. In view of the amendment to Rule 17 CPC, the revision is not maintainable. There is also inordinate delay of … is stated:-'Affidavits must be either affirmed as true to knowledge or from information received provided the source information is disclosed, or as to what the

Mathew N.V., vs Anitha D Costa @ Chinnamma N.V.,

Court: Kerala

AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN THURSDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2021 / 14TH SRAVANA, 1943 OP(C) NO. 3113 OF 2018 AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OS 83/2008 OF SUB COURT, SULTHAN BATHERY, WAYANAD PETITIONER/S: MATHEW N.V., … ISSUED FROM INSTITUTE OF MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH, MEDICAL COLLEGE, KOZHIKODE.EXHIBIT P17 TRUE COPY OF THE ULTRASOUND SCAN REPORT OF ALEX ISSUED FROM DISTRICT HOSPITAL, MANANTHAVADY. EXHIBIT P18 TRUE COPY OF THE O.P. TICKET DATED 22.11.2015 ISSUED

Pushpalatha N.V. W/O Nemraj Vs. V. Padma Widow of Vasantha Kumar D.N.,

Court: Karnataka

inte state. He left behind him, his wife V. Padma - the first defendant herein, the plaintiff and second defendant, the daughters and defendants-3 and … N. Kumar, J.1. This is a plaintiff's appeal against the judgment and decree of the trial Court, granting her … B, C, D and E schedule properties.4. The case of the plaintiff is that her father, Sri D.N. Vasantha Kumar was the owner of all the suit schedule properties having acquired the same under the registered partition

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. N.V. Shanmuganathan and S. Jey ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: II(2005)ACC666; 2006ACJ2276; 2005(2)CTC269

the very same award of the Tribunal, they are being disposed of by the following common order.2. CMA. No: 993 of 1997 is preferred by M/s. United India Insurance Company Ltd., questioning the quantum determined by the … ORDERP. Sathasivam, J.1. Since the Appeal and the Cross Objection arise from the very same award of the Tribunal, they are being disposed of by the following common order.2. CMA. No: 993 … the claimant is entitled for further amount, in the absence of definite information that the injured was completely disabled after the accident due to the

Jan De Nul N.V. Represented by Its Area Manager and Finance Controller ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003(155)ELT221(Mad)

decided against the department, the order passed by the appellate authority should be given effect to. In such view of the matter, it is more appropriate to take up first the writ petition filed by the department. … ORDERP.K. Misra, J.1. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The Writ Petition No. 42580 of 2002 has been filed seeking for a direction for implementation of the order passed by the

Mrs. J. Zeenath Bivi, Proprietrix N.V.K.M. Traders Rep. by Her Power o ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2004)1MLJ406; 2004(28)PTC590(Mad)

8.4.2002. When the matter was listed for the production of additional documents as required by the Court, the first plaintiff in the suit, C.S. No. 455 of 2002 (suit filed by the joint proprietors) N.V.K.M. Khader Ibrahim … N.V. Balasubramanian, J. 1. The above O.S.A. Nos. 30 to 37 of 2003 are preferred against a common order

N.V. Subba Rao Vs. Corporation Bank and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2007(112)FLR685]; 2006(13)SCALE287

of reversal to the lower post. In view of the submission made as above, the High Court has not gone into the merits of the case and disposed of the same on the said submissions. On the … High Court that the employee was agreeable to accept the punishment of reversal to the lower post. In view of the submission made as above, the High Court has not gone into the merits of the case

N.V. Srinivasa Murthy and ors. Vs. Mariyamma (Dead) by Proposed Lrs. a ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC2897; 2005(5)ALD113(SC); 2005(3)AWC2541(SC); 2005(3)CTC545; JT2005(6)SC1; 2005(5)KarLJ17; 2005(II)OLR(SC)425; (2005)5SCC548; 2005(2)LC898(SC)

impugned order passed in Misc. Second Appeal reversed the order of the first appellate court and upheld that of the trial court.2. Learned counsel appearing … been pleaded and the High Court grossly erred in rejecting the plaint on the ground that it does not disclose any cause of action.3. With the assistance and on the comments and counter comments of the parties, … is whether the trial court and the High Court were right in holding that the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure was liable to rejection. The High Court by the impugned

Registrar, T.N.V.A.S. University Vs. Syed Abdul Quayam and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1993Supp(3)SCC437

Shetty,; V. Ramaswamy and; Yogeshwar Dayal, JJ.1. The respondent was appointed as the First Registrar of the Tamil Nadu Veterinary and Animal Sciences University. The appointment purports to have been made under Section 47 of the University

N.V. Narendranath Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Andhra Pradesh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1970SC14; [1969]74ITR190(SC); (1969)1SCC748; [1969]3SCR882

1. These appeals are brought by certificate from the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, dated 30th November, 1964 in Reference Case No. 49 of 1962.2. N. V. Rangarao, the father of the appellant, was the … provisions contained in this Act, there shall be charged for every financial year commencing on and from the first day of April, 1957, a tax (hereinafter referred to as wealth-tax) in respect of every individual, Hindu Undivided