N - Judgment Search Results

N. Vs. N. Nagappa Chettiar and Others V. Income-tax Officer, Pudukotta ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1958]34ITR583(Mad)

Some times in 1952, the Income-tax Officer, Pudukottai, completed the assessment on the petitioners and served the prescribed notice on them. On March 2, 1956, the Income-tax officer issued notices to the assessees under section 35 of

N. Vs.m.s.

Court: Delhi

$-35 * % + MAT.APP (F.C.) 52/2018 N. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on:04. 05 .2018 …..Appellant Through: Mr. D.S. Paweriya,

N vs.s S

Court: Delhi

$~24 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Judgment:02. d April, 2019 + MAT.APP.(F.C.) 17/2018 N S S ..... Appellant Through: Ms.

N. Vs. Subramanian V. Wealth-tax Officer Eluru.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1960]40ITR567(AP)

undivided family till September 16, 1957, when a partition between them is stated to have taken place. A notice under section 14(2) of the Wealth-tax Act (XXVII of 1957), was issued to the petitioner and in response

N. Vs. T. Haji Syed Ibrahim Rowther V. Income-tax Officer, Cuddalore, ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [1963]47ITR665(Mad)

the Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras, who declined to revise the order of the first respondent.The brief facts that need be set out are as follows : The petitioner is a resident of Panruti, South Arcot District, and

N Vs. Brokerage P. Ltd.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

price of the scrip. On receipt of the report from the investigating officer the appellant was issued a notice calling upon it to show cause why action be not taken for manipulating the scrip of the company

N. Vs. Khandvala V. Commissioner of Income-tax.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1946]14ITR635(Bom)

mentioned in the rule.The assessees are stock-brokers. They were assessed for Samvat year 1993 (November 15, 1936, to November 3, 1939) by the Income-tax Officer on their total estimated income and ordered to pay Rs. 16,07,622 under

N. Vs. Handelsbureau La Mola Vs. Kennedy

Court: US Supreme Court

N. v. HANDELSBUREAU LA MOLA V. KENNEDY - 370 U.S. 940 (1962) U.S. Supreme Court N. v. HANDELSBUREAU LA

Sebi Vs. N

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

that the price of the scrip increased from Rs.4 as on 12th October 1999 to Rs.14 on 30th November 1999 and to a peak of Rs.650 on 7th March 2000 and thereafter there was steep fall in

N.P. Saseendran versus N.P. Ponnamma & Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2025] 3 S.C.R. 957

[2025] 3 S.C.R. 957 : 2025 INSC 388N.P. Saseendran v. N.P. Ponnamma & Ors. (Civil Appeal No. 4312 of 2025) 24 March 2025 [J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan,* JJ.]Issue