Mutual Fund - Judgment Search Results

Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs. Kartick Das

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1994)96BOMLR933; (1995)1CALLT18(SC); [1994]81CompCas318(SC); JT1994(3)SC654; 1994(2)SCALE1121; (1994)4SCC225; [1994]Supp1SCR136; MANU/SC/0553/1994

S. Mohan, J. 1. Leave granted.2. The appellant is a domestic mutual fund registered with Securities and Exchange Board of India (hereinafter referred to as 'SEBI') under Registration No. MF/005/93/1, dated … Registration No. MF/005/93/1, dated 5.11.93. The appellant is managed by a Board of Trustees. Pursuant to the SEBI (Mutual Fund) Regulations, the investment management company of the appellant, Morgan Stanley Asset Management India Private Limited was registered with

Icici Prudential Mutual Fund and Anr. Vs. Income Tax office, Ward8(1), ...

Court: Kolkata

OD-1 WP No.1025 of 2015 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction ICICI PRUDENTIAL MUTUAL FUND & ANR. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD-8(1).KOLKATA & ORS.BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE SANJIB BANERJEE Date : 21st January, … tax officer has issued a notice under Section 226(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the fiRs.petitioner mutual fund. The notice of July 15, 2015 claims that since a sum of Rs.4,92,93,215/- is due on account of

incan Mutual Fund Benefit Ltd. Vs. Incan Employees Welfare Association

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [2006]129CompCas977(All); [2004]51SCL438(All)

Judge dated 15-1-2003 allowing all the Company Petitions, namely, 21 in number by winding-up the Company M/s. Incan Mutual Fund Benefit Ltd. under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act. The Official liquidator has also been appointed as Liquidator … misappropriation of the public funds with evil designs and further large sums collected on behalf of M/s. Incan Mutual Fund Benefit Limited have been siphoned off by the Directors, by way of loans or otherwise.2. The other set

Sbi Mutual Fund Vs. Vikas Wsp Ltd.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: [2006]133CompCas542(P& H); (2006)146PLR636; [2006]71SCL368(Punj& Har)

India, a bank constituted under the State Bank of India Act, 1955. The petitioner conduct the business of Mutual Fund by promoting the savings of small and individual investors through various schemes inviting subscriptions from prospective investors and

Indian Bank Mutual Fund and anr. Vs. Sebi and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 160(2009)DLT334; [2009]96SCL1(Delhi)

Sanjiv Khanna, J. 1. By this Writ Petition, the petitioners-Indian Bank Mutual Fund and Indian Bank have challenged the Order dated 30th November, 1999 passed by Chairman, Securities and Exchange Control

Can Bank Mutual Fund Vs. Nuclear Power Corporation of India

Court: Delhi

Reported in: I(2008)BC330; 2007(98)DRJ464

Act, 1882 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Trusts Act') with the primary object of conducting the business of mutual fund by promoting the savings of small and individual investors through various schemes.2. It is stated that the plaintiffs … Regulation No. 20 read with regulation 18 of the SEBI Mutual Funds (Regulations), it is mandatory for every mutual fund to appoint an asset management company to supervise and manage the assets of the trust and in the

Mini Muthoottu Mutual Funds Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax (Centr ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2009]180TAXMAN444(Ker)

even otherwise the petitioner had challenged the adjustment of refund in a statutory revision petition and the revisional authority dismissed the same, by Ext.R(B) order, which the petitioner had not chosen to challenge. That order having become

Uti Mutual Fund, Through Its Trustees Uti Trustee Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs ...

Court: Mumbai

holding the demand in abeyance under Section 220(6) has been rejected. 3. The Petitioner is registered as a mutual fund with the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and has contributed to the funds of nine trusts: … consideration before this Court. On 14 March 2012 the Division Bench of this Court rendered judgment in UTI Mutual Fund v. Income Tax Officer (2012) 345 ITR 71 (Bom). In that case the issue was whether the Revenue

Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund Vs. Piyush Aggarwal and Another

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1994Delhi186; [1994]80CompCas283(Delhi); 53(1994)DLT417; 1994(28)DRJ260

Usha Mehra, J.1. Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund (hereinafter called 'MSMF') published advertisements on December 13, 1993, for public issue commencing on January 6, 1994. Respondent … the case. 1. Securities and Exchange Board of India Act 1993--Public Issue being floated by MSMF (Morgan Stanley Mutual Fund)--allegations (a) no prior permission of Board obtained (b) allotment of units on 1st come 1st serve basis against

Shriram Mutual Fund Vs. the Chairman, Sebi and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Reported in: (2003)46SCL571SAT

and section 15E of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 (the SEBI Act) by Shriram Mutual Fund and Shriram Asset Management Co. Ltd., the Appellants herein. The charge against the Appellants was that they had … 12 cases, during the period from June 1998 to September 1999. It has also been alleged that Shriram Mutual Fund had failed to comply with the terms and conditions attached to the certificate of registration granted to it