Museful - Judgment Search Results
Muse Vs. Arlington Hotel Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-06-1897
Muse v. Arlington Hotel Co. - 168 U.S. 430 (1897) U.S. Supreme Court Muse v. Arlington Hotel Co., 168
M/S Muses Technologies (i) Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi Vs. Haryana Urban Devel ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-28-2014
THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.3785 of 2014 Date of Decision: 28.2.2014 M/s Muses Technologies (I) PVT.Ltd., New Delhi ....Petitioner. Versus Haryana Urban Development Authority, Panchkula ...Respondents. CORAM:- HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR
Muse Khan Vs. State of Raj
Court: Rajasthan Jodhpur
Decided on: Jul-28-2014
[1].IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR ORDER D.B.CIVIL WRIT (PAROLE) PETITION NO.4619/2014 Muse Khan Versus State of Rajasthan & ORS.Date of Order :: 28.07.2014 PRESENT HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE GOVIND MATHUR HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE
18-section briefs on any result in this list
P. Muse Khan and ors. Vs. M. Gopala Krishnaiah and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-12-2002
Reported in: II(2003)ACC677; 2004ACJ1306; 2002(6)ALD612
G. Rohini, J. 1. The short question that falls for consideration in this appeal is whether the agricultural fields where the accident occurred is a 'public place', within the meaning of Section 2(34) of the Motor...
Muse Ram S/O Late Hira Lal Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Allahabad
Decided on: May-11-2007
1. The applicant herein, initially was appointed as LDC in 1973 and later on was promoted to the post of UDC, Head Clerk and then Office Superintendent, but in 1994 the applicant himself volunteered to inform...
Ahmad Asmal Muse Vs. Bai Bibi
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-27-1916
Reported in: AIR1916Bom127; (1917)19BOMLR141
Basil Scott, Kt., C.J.1. A deceased Mahomedan purported to dispose by will of certain bhag property and other property in favour of his widow, with a remainder to his daughter and her issue if she survived...
Ahmed Asmal Muse Vs. Bai Bibi
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-18-1919
Reported in: (1920)22BOMLR826; 57Ind.Cas.553
Norman Macleod, Kt., C.J.1. This suit was originally brought at the beginning of 1913 by the plaintiff. He sued to have a declaration that he was the nearest agnate of the deceased Adam Amanji and that...
In Re: Muse Bagas Abheram
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-26-1908
Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR563
Batchelor, J.1. We think the order made by the learned Magistrate in this case must be set aside. It purports to be made under Sections 1153 and 137 of the Criminal Procedure Code. But the Magistrate...
Mahamad Muse Vs. Bagas Amanji Umar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-06-1908
Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR742
Batchelor, J.1. Although in general the decision of a Court upon one document is not conclusive as to the character of another document, yet the instrument with which we are here concerned, namely Ex. 25, bears...
Dadabhai Muse Valli Vs. Dadabhai Valli Abhram
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-13-1908
Reported in: (1908)10BOMLR745
Basil Scott, C.J.1. This is a suit for redemption in which both parties are agriculturists, and there is no doubt that the provisions of the Dekkhan Agriculturists' Relief Act apply.2. In accordance with the provisions of...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free