Musal - Judgment Search Results
Omdeo Baliram Musale Vs. Prakash Ramchandra Mamidwar .
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Jan-24-2024
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (C) NO.11258/2015 OMDEO BALIRAM MUSALE & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS PRAKASH RAMCHANDRA MAMIDWAR & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) ORDER1 This Special Leave Petition is against the
Sanjay Musale Vs. State of M.P. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-17-1998
Reported in: 1998VIIAD(SC)301; 1998(5)ALT32(SC); JT1998(6)SC487; 1998(5)SCALE358; (1998)6SCC616; [1998]Supp1SCR646; 1999(1)LC117(SC)
1. Delay condoned.2. The writ petition filed in the High Court by the petitioner concealed material facts as is noticed in the impugned order. The petitioner appears to have filed the litigation for someone. There is...
Ramkisan Shamrao Musale and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Throu ...
Court: Mumbai Aurangabad
Decided on: Aug-28-2013
Sunil P. Deshmukh, J. 1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by consent. 2. Petitioners assail, in this group of writ petitions, propriety, legality and validity of communications / letters dated 21.02.2013 and 28.06.2013...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Potu China Musal Vs. Potu Yallamanda and Ano
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-14-2013
Matched in: Parties Potu China Musal Vs. Potu Yallamanda and Ano
Sopana Rambhau Musale and anr. Vs. Baban Bhagwanta Khade
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-13-2006
Reported in: 2006(5)BomCR448
Khanwilkar A.M., J.1. Heard Counsel for the parties.2. Rule. Mr. Tapkir waives notice for the respondent. As a short question is involved, the application is heard finally, forthwith, by consent.3. This application takes exception to the...
Govindrao Ranoji Musale Vs. Sou. Anandibai and anr.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-24-1976
Reported in: AIR1976Bom433; (1977)79BOMLR73; 1977MhLJ144
1. This is an appeal by the husband, who has been unsuccessful in both Courts below. Very few facts are necessary for appreciation of the controversy arising in the appeal. Both the principal parties viz. the...
Roy Musal Naidu Vs. Thandalam Virasami Reddi and anr.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-08-1926
Reported in: AIR1926Mad902; 97Ind.Cas.384
Matched in: Parties Roy Musal Naidu Vs. Thandalam Virasami Reddi and anr.
Narayan Ramchandra Patkar and ors. Vs. Gangadhar Keshav Musale
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-26-1954
Reported in: AIR1955Bom175; (1954)56BOMLR893; ILR1954Bom1256
1. This is a second appeal in execution, which raises a question of law, viz. whether the decree under execution requires registration. The circumstances giving rise to the darkhast out of which the appeal arises are...
Vatsalabai Vinayak Nimkar Vs. Vasudev Vishnu Musale
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-29-1929
Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR666; 136Ind.Cas.177
Baker, J.1. This case involves a point of Hindu law. The facts are simple, and are set out in the judgments of the Courts below. The plaintiffs, who are the granddaughters of one Parvatibai, sued to...
Vatsalabai Vinayak Nimkar Vs. Vasudev Vishnu Musale
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-26-1931
Reported in: AIR1932Bom83; (1931)33BOMLR1483
Patkak, Ag. C.J.1. This was a suit brought by the plaintiffs to recover possession of the property in suit by inheritance to their grandmother, Parvatibai, the widow of Pandurang, who died in the year 1924. Defendant...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free