Municipal Borough - Judgment Search Results
Padmakant Motilal Vora Vs. the Ahmedabad Municipal Borough
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-19-1942
Reported in: AIR1943Bom9; (1942)44BOMLR814
procedure in regard to his dismissal was improper and unfair. Under Section 58 (f) of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act there is provision for making rules delegating to the officers designated in the rules the power to … plaintiff Padrnakant Motilal Vora, who prior to his suspension was a Sub-Overseer or Zilla Inspector in the Ahmedabad Municipality, for a declaration that he was wrongly and improperly dismissed from service by the Municipality and for a
Municipal Borough of Talod Vs. Manubhai Khodidas Rajgor and anr.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-04-2004
Reported in: [2004(102)FLR56]
Matched in: Parties Municipal Borough of Talod Vs. Manubhai Khodidas Rajgor and anr.
idar Municipal Borough Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Dec-19-1997
Reported in: (1998)1GLR722
on February 21, 1997. By the impugned judgment, the learned single Judge dismissed the petition filed by Idar Municipal Borough; formerly Idar Nagar Panchayat [Appellant herein].4. Few relevant facts to appreciate the controversy raised in this appeal may
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Municipal Borough of Belgaum Vs. Durga Prasad Company
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Oct-29-1984
Reported in: ILR1985KAR1004
betelnuts at Karve shop he used to convey them to Belgaum Railway Station to export outside the Belgaum Municipal Borough. To do so, he had to convey the betelnuts by passing Vengurla Toll Naka which would be the … stated here that these two Nakas find place in the Octroi Rules and Bye-laws governing the appellant-the Belgaum Municipal Borough. He brought betelnuts for such export between 9-2-1959 and 13-6-1959 from Karve shop. Octroi was collected at Vengurla
The Ratnagiri Municipal Borough Vs. Dr. Shantaram Hari Ketkar
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-16-1963
Reported in: (1963)65BOMLR787; 1964MhLJ155
Shah, J.1. The Ratnagiri Municipal Borough has filed this appeal by its Chief Officer Dattatraya Laxman Nene against the order of the learned Judicial
Municipal Borough, Bijapur Vs. Gundawan (M.N.) and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-26-1965
Reported in: (1965)IILLJ26Kant
case material for our present purpose are these. The respondents are borne on the staff of the Bijapur Municipal Borough. They work in the octroi department of that borough. They claimed overtime allowance under the provisions of the … from 1 April, 1955 to 31 March, 1958. Their claim was partly allowed and partly disallowed. The Bijapur Municipal Borough has come up with these petitions challenging the decision of the authority to the extent it went against
Godag Belgiri, Municipal Borough, Godag Vs. the Electrical Inspector, ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Sep-18-1961
Reported in: AIR1962Kant209; AIR1962Mys209
in this application is a licensee supplying electrical energy to the consumers within the limits of the petitioner Municipal Borough under Part II of that Act. The petitioner is one of the consumers to which respondent 2 has
The Municipal Borough, Bijapur Vs. M.N. Gundawan and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Feb-26-1965
Reported in: AIR1965Kant317; AIR1965Mys317; (1965)1MysLJ461
case material for our present purpose are these: The respondents are borne on the staff of the Bijapur Municipal Borough. They work on the Octroi Department of that Borough. They claimed overtime allowances under the provisions of the … provisions of the 'Act' from 1-4-1955 to 31-3-1958. Their claim was partly allowed and partly disallowed. The Bijapur Municipal Borough has come up with these petitions challenging the decision of the Authority to the extent it went against
Municipal Borough of Ahmedabad Vs. Jayantilal Chhotalal Patel
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-09-1947
Reported in: AIR1948Bom98; (1947)49BOMLR724
The suit from which this reference to a full bench arises was filed by the plaintiff against the Municipal Borough of Ahmedabad in respect of a contract which the Municipality had entered into with him for the purpose
The Municipal Borough Vs. the Governor General of India in Council
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-16-1946
Reported in: (1947)49BOMLR752
is the Governor General of India in Council representing the G.I.P. Railway Company, and the defendant is the Municipal Borough of Sholapur. The railway company owns two buildings known as 'Porters' Gate Quarters' bearing Municipal Nos. 60/53 and … buildings known as 'Porters' Gate Quarters' bearing Municipal Nos. 60/53 and 60/54 within the limits of the Sholapur Municipal Borough. But when the Municipality prepared the assessment list under Section 78 of the Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925,
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · drag or use +/− to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free