Municipal - Judgment Search Results

Municipality Vs. Mohan Singh and anr.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2002(5)WLN558

of the plaintiff-respondent No. 1 made by petitioner-defendant. After following the Recruitment procedure as laid down in Rajasthan Municipalities, (Class IV) Services Rules. This appointment prima facie is not only de hors of recruitment rules aforestated but

Municipality Vs. Glaciers Cold Storage and

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 1980CriLJ755

Having obtained leave to file an appeal against the acquittal of the respondents under Section 417 Cr.P.C., the Municipality Jammu, has filed this appeal against an order of acquittal passed by the learned Munsiff Magistrate, First Class

Municipality Vs. Puran Prakash

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 1975CriLJ677

300/-. The S. J. on appeal maintained the conviction but reduced the fine to Rupees 100/-. The complainant Municipality has filed this application for enhancing the sentence imposed on the accused. The accused has not filed any

Chaman Lal and ors. Vs. Municipality and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (2004)136PLR234a

Mr. Ajai Lamba, learned counsel, who represents respondents-Municipal Committee, Yamuna Nagar, refers to Section 240(1)(c) of the Haryana Municipal Act, 1973 and on the basis thereof states that an alternative remedy of appeal against the impugned orders

Steel Authority of India Limited Vs. Municipality

Court: Jharkhand

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P(C)No.4493of2012 SteelAuthorityofIndiaLimitedVs.RanchiMunicipalCorporation&Ors. CORAM: HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY FortheAppellant/Petitioner:Mr.IndrajitSinha FortheRespondents:Mr.R.R.Nath OrderNo.13 Dated23 rd July,2013 Admit. Noneedtoissuenoticeastherespondentshavealreadyputin appearance. Listthiscaseforconsidrationofgrantofinterimorderin3 rdweek ofAugust,2013undertheheading,ForOrders. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) dey

Steel Authority of India Limited Vs. Municipality

Court: Jharkhand

JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (PIL) No. 4493 of 2012 Steel Authority of India Limited …… Petitioner Versus Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi & ors. …… Respondents ­­­­­­­­­ CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR

Krishna Devi Vs. Municipality

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1996)112PLR530

J.1. This is unsuccessful plaintiffs regular second appeal.2. Plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction restraining the defendant, Municipal Committee from issuing Teh Bazari of Khokha in occupation of Baldev Raj, defendant No. 2, in front of

Akhtar HussaIn and ors. Vs. Municipality

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2002(5)WLC662; 2007(2)WLN718

learned counsel Mr. Mehta has no substance because in the instant case, the Executive Officer of the respondent Municipality filed an application under Section 133 Cr. P.C. for removing the nuisance caused by the petitioners by running

S.K. Mahajan and Etc. Vs. Municipality

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 1982CriLJ646

I.K. Kotwal, J.1. We are called upon to answer three different questions of law arising in three criminal references Nos. 27 of 1977, 61 of 1978 and 28 of 1979 which, if stated more exhaustively. should...

P.M.R.M.M. Sivasami Nadar and ors. Vs. Municipality

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1935Mad1056; 159Ind.Cas.929

owners of certain motor buses and the suits, the subject of this petition, were tiled against the Madura Municipality and the toll-gate contractors for refund of sums alleged to have been illegally collected by them in respect