Mu - Judgment Search Results

Ma.Mu.Maruthan, vs U.Ambika,

Court: Chennai

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.01.2026CORAMTHE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR C.R.P. (MD) No.93 of 2022 and C.M.P(MD) No.458 of 2022 1.Ma.Mu.Maruthan 2.Ma. Rajeswari 3.Janaki Ravindran ... Petitioners/Respondents Vs. U.Ambika ... Respondent/Petitioner PRAYER:...

Abdul Mu Umeen vs the District Collector

Court: Kerala

2020 IN WP(C). 6197/2020 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 6197/2020(Y) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA REVIEW PETITIONER: ABDUL MU UMEEN VELIYIL HOUSE, PUTHUPPALLY VADAKKUMURI, PUTHUPALLY PO, PUTHUPALLY VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY HIS POWER OF

Mu Gems Jewellery Works, vs the State Tax Officer,

Court: Kerala

MR.JUSTICE S.V.BHATTI THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF APRIL 2019 / 21ST CHAITHRA, 1941 WP(C).No. 11828 of 2019 PETITIONER/S: MU GEMS JEWELLERY WORKS, ALWIA COMPLEX, 10/820, POLY JUNCTION, 10, THRIPRAYAR, VALAPPAD, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY

Kuppammal Vs. Mu. Ve. Pethanna Chetty

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1956Mad250; (1956)1MLJ52

On this evidence and also on an examination of the torn portion of the pronote, the learned District Munsif found, accepting the evidence of the defence witnesses, that the pronote was insufficiently stamped and therefore cannot be

Patidar Products, Mu, Matirala Vs. Patidar Industries, Ellisbridge, Ah ...

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Matched in: Parties Patidar Products, Mu, Matirala Vs. Patidar Industries, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad and Another

Mu. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. C.K. Kadar Mohideen Rowther and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1925Mad791; 84Ind.Cas.968; (1924)47MLJ522

Matched in: Parties Mu. Chidambaram Chettiar Vs. C.K. Kadar Mohideen Rowther and ors.

Mu'MIn Vs. Virginia

Court: US Supreme Court

Mu'Min v. Virginia - 500 U.S. 415 (1991) U.S. Supreme Court Mu'Min v. Virginia, 500 U.S. 415 (1991) Mu'Min

Smt. Kamala and Sri Venkappa M Agadi Charitable Trust (Regd) vs Direct ...

Court: Karnataka

-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2024 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 802 OF 2021 (RES) BETWEEN: SMT. KAMALA AND SRI VENKAPPA...

S.P. Shenbagamoorthy Vs. Mr. Mu. KA. StalIn and the Director, Director ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2003CriLJ271

the role of a police officer and then file a petition stating that the time limit given therein must be deleted and the officer must be given unlimited period to keep it pending on his file.'14. It

At. N. at. Chockalingam Chettiar Vs. Rama Mu Rama Palaniappa Chettiar

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1935Mad23; 155Ind.Cas.184

to fall back upon the theory of an implied debt from the mere fact of a loan; ho must be permitted to prove the very terms contained in the suit letter under the guise of an original