Movingly - Judgment Search Results
Move on Leisure and Travel (I) Pvt. Ltd., vs the Union of India,
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jul-01-2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE GOPINATH P. FRIDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JULY 2022 / 10TH ASHADHA, 1944 WP(C) NO. 17794 OF 2022 PETITIONER: M/S MOVE ON LEISURE AND...
Earth Moving Equipment Owners and vs the Director
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Oct-27-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMPRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2021 / 5TH KARTHIKA, 1943 WP(C) NO. 13615 OF 2011 PETITIONER: EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT OWNERS AND OPERATORS...
Globe Moving and Storage Company Private Limited vs Joint Commissioner ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-03-2025
-1-IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO.20466 OF 2023 (T-RES) BETWEEN:GLOBE MOVING AND STORAGE COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED NO.3M-105,...
18-section briefs on any result in this list
Furniture and Moving Drivers Vs. Crowley
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-12-1984
Furniture & Moving Drivers v. Crowley - 467 U.S. 526 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Furniture & Moving Drivers v. Crowley, 467 U.S. 526 (1984) Local No. 82, Furniture & Piano Moving, Furniture Store Drivers, Helpers, Warehousemen...
Schneider Moving and Storage Vs. Robbins
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-18-1984
Schneider Moving & Storage v. Robbins - 466 U.S. 364 (1984) U.S. Supreme Court Schneider Moving & Storage v. Robbins, 466 U.S. 364 (1984) Schneider Moving & Storage Co. v. Robbins No. 82-1860 Argued February 21,...
Hcandd; Moving and Storage Co., Inc., Vs. Yamane
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-21-1966
HC&D; MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. YAMANE - 383 U.S. 104 (1966) U.S. Supreme Court HC&D; MOVING & STORAGE CO., INC., v. YAMANE, 383 U.S. 104 (1966) 383 U.S. 104 HC&D; MOVING & STORAGE CO.,...
Tata Capital Limited vs Balaji Cargo Moving Transport & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-26-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 26.05.2026 + ARB.P. 425/2026TATA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nachiketa Vijay Suri, Mr. Raj Kumar, Mr. Kashish Aggarwal and Ms. Shubhangi Singh, Advocates.versusBALAJI CARGO...
The Management, Hindustan Motors Earth Moving Equipment Division Limit ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-20-2007
Reported in: 2007(2)CTC31; (2007)IILLJ59Mad
ORDERK. Chandru, J.1. Writ Petition Nos. 20933 & 23606 of 2006 have been filed against the order of the Labour Court/first respondent made in I.A. No. 117/2006 in I.D. No. 514/2001 dated 19.6.2006 and the other...
The Spiritual Regeneration Move.Found. Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-06-2012
W.P.No.3281/2008 06.11.2012 Shri A. Zargar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri S.K.Shrivastava, learned P.L.for the State. Heard. The petitioners in the present petition have challenged the action of the respondents in realizing the electricity duties from...
M/S. Sri Vasudharini Enterprises Civil Engineering, Contractors and Ea ...
Court: Tamil Nadu State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Chennai
Decided on: Jul-19-2011
Petition dt.10.03.2004, was filed, praying for a direction to the opposite party to pay Rs.38,00,000/- towards the HD Excavator cost, alongwith compensation of Rs.5 lakhs, Rs.10 lakhsfor loss of business, Rs.5 lakhs for mental agony alongwith...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- Next ›
- Last »
Hover bars for counts · use +/− or drag to zoom · click a bar to filter by year
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free