Motion Picture - Judgment Search Results

Motion Pictures Association, in Re: G.S. Mayawala and Others Vs. Motio ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: [1984]55CompCas375(Delhi)

in C.P. No. 106 of 1974 (B. R. Kundra v. Motion Pictures Association, [1975] 1 DelHI 692. The same problem cropped setting dispute between the parties. As regards the registration of pictures where the dues are outstanding, the company promised that no

Motion Picture Patents Co. Vs. Universal Film Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

projecting machine shall be used solely for exhibiting or projecting motion pictures containing the inventions of reissued letters patent No. 12,192, by the Amusement Company, may be used only with moving picture films containing the invention of reissued patent No. 12,192, so

Bengal Motion Pictures Employees Union, Calcutta Vs. Kohinoor Pictures ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1964Cal519,(1965)ILLJ387Cal

the application were the State- of West Bengal, the Bengal Motion Picture Association - a company incorporated under the Indian Companies dated the 16th May 1960 as against the said Kohi-noor Pictures Private Limited. The grounds on which the validity of the

Motion Picture Association and Eastern India Motion Picture Associatio ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995IVAD(Delhi)55; 60(1995)DLT180; 1995(35)DRJ582

agreement. (12) In the petition filed by the Eastern India Motion Picture Association (CWP No. 4703/93), as noted above, there is (12) In the petition filed by the Eastern India Motion Picture Association (CWP No. 4703/93), as noted above, there is challenge

Ftc Vs. Motion Picture Advertising Svc. Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

FTC v. Motion Picture Advertising Svc. Co., Inc. - 344 U.S. 392 (1953) 344 U.S. 392 (1953) U.S. Supreme Court FTC v. Motion Picture Advertising Svc. Co., Inc., 344 U.S. 392 (1953) Federal Trade

Sampliner Vs. Motion Picture Patents Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

a verdict, and I am going to pass on that motion." "Mr. Rogers: But, your honor, I submit there aren't any result of the unlawful agreement by and between the Motion Picture Patents Company, . . . all of said parties having

Eastern India Motion Pictures and ors. Vs. Performing Right Society Lt ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1978Cal477

case of Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Eastern India Motion Pictures Association reported in : [1977]3SCR206 . The distinction sought of Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. v. Eastern India Motion Pictures Association reported in : [1977]3SCR206 . The distinction sought to

Aaa Film Motion Picture Producers and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: AIR1999Delhi178; ILR1998Delhi763

are engaged in the business of production and direction of motion pictures and T.V. Serialls. The Deputy Controller of Programmes, Directorate a better footing than the case of AAA Film Motion Picture Producers (CWP No. 2982/98) as the respondents by means of

Eastern India Motion Picture Association Vs. Satish Chandra Poddar

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (1994)1CALLT301(HC),98CWN499

the domain of the Bye- Laws of the Eastern India Motion Picture Association which alone could decide the controversy between the India has been directed by the aggrieved petitioner-Eastern India Motion Picture Association to dislodge the order being Order No. 33 dated

Prism Motion Pictures Private Limited vs.mukta Arts Limited & Anr.

Court: Delhi

and registered the same with the Defendant No.2 Indian Motion Pictures Producers Association (IMPPA). The said body i.e. Defendant No.2 NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t August, 2018. PRISM MOTION PICTURES PRIVATE LIMITED CS (COMM) 1322/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mohd. Fuzail