Skip to content
How to use Narrow results with filters
  1. Run a keyword search first to load the results page.
  2. Select Supreme Court, a High Court, or tribunal on the left.
  3. Optionally filter by decision year to focus on recent or historical cases.

Motion Picture - Judgment Search Results

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 18 1981

Motion Pictures Association, in Re: G.S. Mayawala and Others Vs. Motio ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-18-1981

Reported in: [1984]55CompCas375(Delhi)

S.B. Wad, J. 1. On October 1, 1981, I have passed an order appointing an administrator for the Motion Pictures Association and he has assumed charge. Ordinarily, I would have passed a reasoned order if there was … Wad, J. 1. On October 1, 1981, I have passed an order appointing an administrator for the Motion Pictures Association and he has assumed charge. Ordinarily, I would have passed a reasoned order if there was sufficient


Jul 04 2016

Balaji Motion Pictures Ltd. and Another Vs. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jul-04-2016

to the Plaintiffs. 8. In fairness, when I pointed out that the cast of the prayers in the Motion is much too wide and relates to entire websites, Mr. Dhond agreed to amend these. He now places


Aug 31 2018

Prism Motion Pictures Private Limited vs.mukta Arts Limited & Anr.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-31-2018

* + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t August, 2018. PRISM MOTION PICTURES PRIVATE LIMITED CS (COMM) 1322/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mohd. Fuzail Khan and Ms. Shafali versus Jain, Advocates. … + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:31. t August, 2018. PRISM MOTION PICTURES PRIVATE LIMITED CS (COMM) 1322/2016 ..... Plaintiff Through: Mohd. Fuzail Khan and Ms. Shafali versus Jain, Advocates. (M:9818331923)


18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 06 1993

Bihar Motion Picture Association and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Sep-06-1993

Matched in: Parties Bihar Motion Picture Association and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.


Aug 31 1995

Motion Picture Association and Eastern India Motion Picture Associatio ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Aug-31-1995

Reported in: 1995IVAD(Delhi)55; 60(1995)DLT180; 1995(35)DRJ582

a cinema owner/exhibitor from entering into such an agreement. (12) In the petition filed by the Eastern India Motion Picture Association (CWP No. 4703/93), as noted above, there is challenge to the constitutional validity of section 5(3) of … electricity charges, and use of machinery for the purpose. (19) Mr. Dushyant Dave, Advocate, appearing for Eastern India Motion Picture Association, petitioner in Cwp No. 4703/93, submitted that sub-section (3) of section 5 of the Bengal Act and


Sep 07 1998

Aaa Film Motion Picture Producers and anr. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-07-1998

Reported in: AIR1999Delhi178; ILR1998Delhi763

raise common questions. thereforee, both the writ petitions are being disposed of together. The first petitioner, AAA Film Motion Picture Producers, is a sole proprietary firm of the second petitioner, Mr. Sanjay Khan. The petitioners are engaged in … submitted that the case of his clients stands on a better footing than the case of AAA Film Motion Picture Producers (CWP No. 2982/98) as the respondents by means of their letter dated October 13, 1997 had agreed


Jan 17 1994

Eastern India Motion Picture Association Vs. Satish Chandra Poddar

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-17-1994

Reported in: (1994)1CALLT301(HC),98CWN499

and also under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been directed by the aggrieved petitioner-Eastern India Motion Picture Association to dislodge the order being Order No. 33 dated 28.4.93, passed by the City Civil Court, 3rd … dispute of this type as it is within the domain of the Bye- Laws of the Eastern India Motion Picture Association which alone could decide the controversy between the parties. In amplifying the submission he has canvassed with


Apr 25 1978

Eastern India Motion Pictures and ors. Vs. Performing Right Society Lt ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-25-1978

Reported in: AIR1978Cal477

the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Indian Performing Right Society, Ltd. v. Eastern India Motion Pictures Association reported in : [1977]3SCR206 . In this context Mr. Bachawat has submitted that the Society is … decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Indian Performing Right Society, Ltd. v. Eastern India Motion Pictures Association reported in : [1977]3SCR206 . In this context Mr. Bachawat has submitted that the Society is representing


Feb 13 1974

Eastern India Motion Pictures Association and ors. Vs. Indian Performi ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Feb-13-1974

Reported in: AIR1974Cal257

that a cinematograph film includes its sound track (Section 2(f)). And 'sound track' means the area of a Motion picture film that carries the sound record: vide Webster's Seventh New Collegiate Dictionary, p. 835. The composer of music


Aug 14 1963

Bengal Motion Pictures Employees Union, Calcutta Vs. Kohinoor Pictures ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Aug-14-1963

Reported in: AIR1964Cal519,(1965)ILLJ387Cal

the same. On 18th July 1961 the Labour Commissioner, West Bengal, wrote a letter to the Secretary, Bengal Motion Picture Association, respondent No. 2, intimating that a conference would be held on the 19th July 1961 at his … house which had taken place at that time. A copy of this letter was forwarded to the Bengal Motion Picture Employees union, being the appellant before us. As a result of the meeting held by the Labour Commissioner


  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »
Loading chart…

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial