Mote - Judgment Search Results

Motes Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Motes v. United States - 178 U.S. 458 (1900) U.S. Supreme Court Motes v. United States, 178 U.S. 458

Digvijay Mote Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1993(5)SC1; 1993(3)SCALE461; (1993)4SCC175; [1993]Supp1SCR553

Matched in: Parties Digvijay Mote Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Dattatreya Shanker Mote and ors. Vs. Anand Chintaman Datar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1974)2SCC799; [1975]2SCR224

contended before the High Court that whatever may be the position under Section 100 of the Act, respondents Motes would still be protected by Section 52 by the doctrine of Us pendens. Overruling' a preliminary objection that

Vasant Laxman Mote and ors. Vs. Rajendra Kumar Pande (Dead) by L.Rs. K ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR457; (2002)2BOMLR702; 2002(4)MhLj832

Matched in: Parties Vasant Laxman Mote and ors. Vs. Rajendra Kumar Pande (Dead) by L.Rs. Kamlabai Bajranglal Pande and ors.

Motu Melgandi @ Mote Melgandi @ Mota Melgandi Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6923 of 2011 ------Motu Melgandi @ Mote Melgandi @ Mota Melgandi .. Petitioner -VersusThe State of Jharkhand CORAM : ...... Opposite Party -----HONBLE MR. JUSTICE

Mote Shah and Co., Karad Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1952]22ITR39(Bom)

Chagla, C.J.1. The firm of Mote Shah & Co., which was an unregistered firm, was assessed to tax for the assessment year 1949-50. The

Mote Shah and Co. Karad Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1952Bom447; (1952)54BOMLR570

Chagla, C.J.[1] The firm of Mote Shah & Co., which was an unregistered firm, was assessed to tax for the assessment year 1949-50. The

Raichand Gulabchand Vs. Dattatraya Shankar Mote and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1964Bom1; (1963)65BOMLR510; ILR1963Bom509

Matched in: Parties Raichand Gulabchand Vs. Dattatraya Shankar Mote and ors.

The Poona Herald Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(3)BomCR324; 2008(4)MhLj730

below and the relevant documents.3. To state in brief, the present applicants are the original defendants. One Vinod Motee was original landlord. He had initially given suit premises to the defendants on leave and licence basis. In

Maharashtra Mandal Through Its Secretary, the Head Master, Maharashtra ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(3)ALLMR408; 2009(1)BomCR456; 2008(5)MhLj59

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. This petition arises from the judgment and order dated 29/1/1998 rendered by the School Tribunal at Pune thereby allowing Appeal No. 43 of 1996 filed by the original respondent-appellant. By the said order...