Mote - Judgment Search Results

Motes Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Motes v. United States - 178 U.S. 458 (1900) U.S. Supreme

Digvijay Mote Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1993(5)SC1; 1993(3)SCALE461; (1993)4SCC175; [1993]Supp1SCR553

S. Mohan, J.1. These Writ Petitions have been preferred by way of Public Interest Litigation for the enforcement of fundamental...

Dattatreya Shanker Mote and ors. Vs. Anand Chintaman Datar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1974)2SCC799; [1975]2SCR224

be the position under Section 100 of the Act, respondents Motes would still be protected by Section 52 by the doctrine

Vasant Laxman Mote and ors. Vs. Rajendra Kumar Pande (Dead) by L.Rs. K ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR457; (2002)2BOMLR702; 2002(4)MhLj832

D.D. Sinha, J.1. Heard Shri Chandurkar, learned counsel for the applicants. None appears for the non-applicants though served.2. The Civil...

Motu Melgandi @ Mote Melgandi @ Mota Melgandi Vs. State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

AT RANCHI B.A No. 6923 of 2011 ------Motu Melgandi @ Mote Melgandi @ Mota Melgandi .. Petitioner -VersusThe State of Jharkhand

Mote Shah and Co., Karad Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: [1952]22ITR39(Bom)

Chagla, C.J.1. The firm of Mote Shah & Co., which was an unregistered firm, was assessed

Mote Shah and Co. Karad Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax, Bombay South

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1952Bom447; (1952)54BOMLR570

Chagla, C.J.[1] The firm of Mote Shah & Co., which was an unregistered firm, was assessed

Raichand Gulabchand Vs. Dattatraya Shankar Mote and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1964Bom1; (1963)65BOMLR510; ILR1963Bom509

Patel, J. 1. These two appeals arise out of connected proceedings. It will be sufficient to state the facts in...

The Poona Herald Pvt. Ltd., a Company Incorporated Under the Companies ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(3)BomCR324; 2008(4)MhLj730

brief, the present applicants are the original defendants. One Vinod Motee was original landlord. He had initially given suit premises to

Maharashtra Mandal Through Its Secretary, the Head Master, Maharashtra ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(3)ALLMR408; 2009(1)BomCR456; 2008(5)MhLj59

B.H. Marlapalle, J.1. This petition arises from the judgment and order dated 29/1/1998 rendered by the School Tribunal at Pune...